Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:36:24.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Small-mass graphite preparation for AMS 14C measurements performed at GIGCAS, China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2017

P Ding ,
C D Shen ,
W X Yi ,
N Wang  and
X F Ding
P Ding
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510640 Guangzhou, China
C D Shen*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510640 Guangzhou, China State Key Laboratory of Nuclear physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
W X Yi
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510640 Guangzhou, China
N Wang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510640 Guangzhou, China
X F Ding
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Nuclear physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The sealed tube Zn reduction method has been applied for small-mass samples ranging from 15 to 100 μg carbon preparation for accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon (14C) measurements at the AMS-14C Preparation Lab in Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences (GIGCAS). The volume of the sealed reactor tube is reduced to ~0.75 cm3 in order to increase the yield of graphite. Graphite targets are measured at the Keck Carbon Cycle AMS Facility at the University of California, Irvine (KCCAMS). The targets generate a maximum 12C+1 current of about 0.5 μA per 1 μg C. The modern-carbon background is estimated to be 0.25–0.60 μg C, and dead-carbon background to be ~0.3–0.9 μg C. Both modern-carbon background and dead-carbon background are size dependent, so the results can be corrected. The precision of the small-mass modern carbon standard samples is±15–25‰ for the size of ~15–20 μg C,±5–10‰ for ~20–50 μg C, and±3–10‰ for 50–100 μg C. Further reduction of dead-carbon and modern-carbon contamination is needed in preparation of small-mass samples at GIGCAS.

Keywords

radiocarbon AMS datingmodern-carbon backgroundsmall-mass sampledead-carbon background
Type
Chemical Pretreatment Approaches
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 59 , Special Issue 3: Proceedings of the 22nd International Radiocarbon Conference (Part 2 of 2) , June 2017 , pp. 705 - 711
Copyright
© 2017 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 2015 Radiocarbon Conference, Dakar, Senegal, 16–20 November 2015

References

Ding, P, Shen, CD, Yi, WX, Wang, N, Ding, XF, Liu, KX, Fu, DP, Liu, WG, Liu, Y. 2015. A high-resolution method for 14C analysis of a coral from South China Sea: implication for “AD 775” 14C event. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 361:659–664.Google Scholar
Khosh, MS, Xu, X, Trumbore, SE. 2010. Small-mass graphite preparation by sealed tube zinc reduction method for AMS 14C measurements. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7–8):927–930.Google Scholar
Lang, SQ, McIntyre, CP, Bernasconi, SM, Früh-Green, GL, Voss, BM, Eglinton, TI, Wacker, L. 2016. Rapid 14C analysis of dissolved organic carbon in non-saline waters. Radiocarbon 58(3):505–515.Google Scholar
Liu, JW, Li, J, Zhang, YL, Liu, D, Ding, P, Shen, CD, Shen, KJ, He, QF, Ding, X, Wang, XM, Chen, DH, Szidat, S, Zhang, G. 2014. Source apportionment using radiocarbon and organic tracers for PM2.5 carbonaceous aerosols in Guangzhou, South China: contrasting local- and regional-scale haze events. Environment Science & Technology 48(20):12002–12011.Google Scholar
Liu, KX, Ding, XF, Fu, DP, Pan, Y, Wu, XH, Guo, ZY, Zhou, LP. 2007. A new compact AMS system at Peking University. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259:23–26.Google Scholar
Santos, GM, Southon, JR, Griffin, S, Beaupre, SR, Druffel, ERM. 2007. Ultra small-mass AMS 14C sample preparation and analyses at KCCAMS/UCI Facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):293–302.Google Scholar
Xu, X, Trumbore, SE, Zheng, S, Southon, JR, McDuffee, KE, Luttgen, M, Liu, JC. 2007. Modifying a sealed tube zinc reduction method for preparation of AMS graphite targets: reducing background and attaining high precision. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):320–329.Google Scholar
Xu, X, Gao, P, Salamanca, EG. 2013. Ultra small-mass graphitization by sealed tube zinc reduction method for AMS 14C measurements. Radiocarbon 55(2–3):608–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar