Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:29:48.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon Analysis on the New AARAMS 1MV Tandetron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2016

Jesper Olsen ,
Dmitry Tikhomirov ,
Claus Grosen ,
Jan Heinemeier  and
Matthias Klein
Jesper Olsen*
Affiliation:
Aarhus AMS Centre (AARAMS), Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Dmitry Tikhomirov
Affiliation:
Aarhus AMS Centre (AARAMS), Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Claus Grosen
Affiliation:
Aarhus AMS Centre (AARAMS), Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Jan Heinemeier
Affiliation:
Aarhus AMS Centre (AARAMS), Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Matthias Klein
Affiliation:
High Voltage Engineering Europa (HVE), Amersfoort, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We report here on the radiocarbon performance on the AARAMS HVE 1MV Tandetron. 14C analysis is carried out in charge state 2+. We have avoided Li interference by appropriate settings of the high-energy electrostatic analyzer and the 30° second high-energy magnet. The 14C machine background is determined using unprocessed graphite, which yielded 58,650±2032 14C yr determined as the average and standard deviation of four measurements. International standards, which are used to monitor the long-term performance of the 14C measurements, agree with the reported consensus values.

Keywords

radiocarbonAMSdating
Type
Advances in Physical Measurement Techniques
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 59 , Special Issue 3: Proceedings of the 22nd International Radiocarbon Conference (Part 2 of 2) , June 2017 , pp. 905 - 913
Copyright
© 2016 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 2015 Radiocarbon Conference, Dakar, Senegal, 16–20 November 2015

References

REFERENCES

Bevington, PR, Robinson, DK. 2003. Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gulliksen, S, Scott, M. 1995. Report of the TIRI workshop, Saturday 13 August 1994. Radiocarbon 37(2):820–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinemeier, J, Olsen, J, Klein, M, Mous, D. 2015. The new extended HVE 1 MV multi-element AMS system for low background installed at the Aarhus AMS Dating Centre. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 361:143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, W, Park, JH, Sung, KS, Woo, HJ, Kim, JK, Choi, HW, Kim, GD. 2010. A new 1MV AMS facility at KIGAM. Radiocarbon 52(2):243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, MG, Mous, DJW, Gottdang, A. 2006. A compact 1 MV multi-element AMS system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 249(1–2):764–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, MG, van Staveren, HJ, Mous, DJW, Gottdang, A. 2007. Performance of the compact HVE 1 MV multi-element AMS system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):184–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, MG, Heinemeier, J, Gottdang, A, Mous, DJW, Olsen, J. 2014. Extension of the HVE 1 MV multi-element AMS system for low background. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 331:204–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Clercq, M, van der Plicht, J, Gröning, M. 1998. New 14C reference materials with activities of 15 and 50 pMC. Radiocarbon 40(1):295–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loyd, DH, Vogel, JS, Trumbore, S. 1991. Lithium contamination in AMS measurements of 14C. Radiocarbon 33(3):297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, M-J, Vaernes, E, Svarva, HL, Larsen, E, Gulliksen, S, Klein, M, Mous, DJW. 2015. Status of the “new” AMS facility in Trondheim. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 361:149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozanski, R. 1992. The IAEA 14C Intercomparison Exercise 1990. Radiocarbon 34(3):506–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, GM, Southon, JR, Druffel-Rodriguez, KC, Griffin, S, Mazon, M. 2004. Magnesium perchlorate as an alternative water trap in AMS graphite sample preparation: a report on sample preparation at KCCAMS at the University of California, Irvine. Radiocarbon 46(1):165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steier, P, Dellinger, F, Kutschera, W, Priller, A, Rom, W, Wild, EM. 2004. Pushing the precision limit of 14C AMS. Radiocarbon 46(1):5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sung, KH, Hong, W, Park, G, Lee, JG. 2015. Radiocarbon measurement with 1 MV AMS at charge state 1. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 361:586–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, JS, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE. 1987. Catalyst and binder effects in the use of filamentous graphite for AMS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 29(1–2):50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, JS, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE, Brown, TA. 1984. Performance of catalytically condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5(2):289–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar