Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:42:37.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Luminescence and Radiocarbon Dating of Mortars at Milano-Bicocca Laboratories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2020

Laura Panzeri ,
Francesco Maspero Open the ORCID record for Francesco Maspero [Opens in a new window] ,
Anna Galli ,
Emanuela Sibilia  and
Marco Martini
Laura Panzeri
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienza dei Materiali, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, via R. Cozzi 55, 20125Milano, Italy INFN, Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 3, 20126Milano, Italy
Francesco Maspero*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienza dei Materiali, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, via R. Cozzi 55, 20125Milano, Italy INFN, Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 3, 20126Milano, Italy
Anna Galli
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienza dei Materiali, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, via R. Cozzi 55, 20125Milano, Italy INFN, Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 3, 20126Milano, Italy CNR-IBFM, Via F.lli Cervi, 93, 20090Segrate (MI), Italy
Emanuela Sibilia
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienza dei Materiali, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, via R. Cozzi 55, 20125Milano, Italy INFN, Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 3, 20126Milano, Italy
Marco Martini
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienza dei Materiali, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, via R. Cozzi 55, 20125Milano, Italy INFN, Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 3, 20126Milano, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This work shows the results of optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) and radiocarbon (14C) dating applied to mortars of historical structures in northern Italy. All the results are compared with archaeological evidence and thermoluminescence (TL) dating of bricks. The main issue for OSL mortar dating is that the quartz grains contained in the mortar may be only partially bleached, leading to an overestimation of the sample age. In order to identify the best protocol to apply, both multi-grain (MG) and single grain (SG) methods were used. The minimum age model (MAM) statistical approach was applied to refine their accuracy. However, the identification of the bleached grains is not always successful, indicating that further investigations are needed to develop suitable dating protocol. For the 14C technique, a crucial aspect is the selection of anthropogenic calcite. In this work the mortars were treated using a Cryosonic method to select anthropogenic calcite from raw material, and the obtained powder was sieved to select the finer fraction. Unfortunately, only in two cases an acceptable amount of sample could be obtained. All the fractions were dated via accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS), and the results compared with independently obtained dates. The results show that the execution of the dating analysis requires previous characterizations to assess the nature of the mortar components and avoid unusable fractions.

Keywords

mortarsOSL datingquartzradiocarbon AMS dating
Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 62 , Issue 3: MoDIM 2018 Proceedings of the Mortar Dating International Meeting , June 2020 , pp. 657 - 666
Copyright
© 2020 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the Mortar Dating International Meeting, Pessac, France, 25–27 Oct. 2018

References

REFERENCES

Addis, A, Secco, M, Marzaioli, F, Artioli, G, Arnaus, AC, Passariello, I, Terrasi, F, Brogiolo, GP. 2019. Selecting the most reliable C-14 dating material inside mortars: The origin of the Padua cathedral. Radiocarbon 61(2):375–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aitken, MJ. 1985. Thermoluminescence dating. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, RM, Smith, BW, Rhodes, EJ. 1997. Partial bleaching and the decay form characteristics of quartz OSL. Radiat Meas 27(2):123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, WT. 1979. Thermoluminescence dating: radiation dose-rate data. Archaeometry 21:243–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boaretto, E, Poduska, KM. 2013. Materials science challenges in radiocarbon dating: The case of archaeological plasters. JOM-J Min Met Mat S 65(4):481–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botter-Jensen, L, Murray, AS. 2002. Optically stimulated luminescence in retrospective dosimetry. Radiat Prot Dosim 101(1–4):309–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, S. 1970. Thermoluminescence dating: Refinement of the quartz inclusion method. Archaeometry 12:133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, RF, Roberts, RG, Laslett, GM, Yoshida, H, Olley, JM. 1999. Optical dating of single and multiple grains of quartz from Jinmium rock shelter, Northern Australia: Part I. Archaeometry 41(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galli, A, Martini, M, Maspero, F, Panzeri, L, Sibilia, E. 2014. Surface dating of bricks, an application of luminescence techniques. Eur Phys J Plus. 129(5).10.1140/epjp/i2014-14101-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guérin, G, Mercier, N, Adamiec, G. 2011. Dose-rate conversion factors: Update. Ancient TL 29:5–8.Google Scholar
Guibert, P, Christophe, C, Urbanova, P, Guerin, G, Blain, S. 2017. Modeling incomplete and heterogeneous bleaching of mobile grains partially exposed to the light: Towards a new tool for single grain OSL dating of poorly bleached mortars. Radiat Meas 107:48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajdas, I, Lindroos, A, Heinemeier, J, Ringbom, A, Marzaioli, F, Terrasi, F, Passariello, I, Capano, M, Artioli, G, Addis, A, Secco, M, Michalska, D, Czernik, J, Goslar, T, Hayen, R, Van Strydonck, M, Fontaine, L, Boudin, M, Maspero, F, Panzeri, L, Galli, A, Urbanová, P, Guibert, P. 2017. Preparation and dating of mortar samples-mortar dating inter-comparison study (MODIS). Radiocarbon 59(6):1845–1858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayen, R, Van Strydonck, M, Fontaine, L, Boudin, M, Lindroos, A, Heinemeier, J, Ringbom, A, Michalska, D, Hajdas, I, Hueglin, S, Marzaioli, F, Terrasi, F, Passariello, I, Capano, M, Maspero, F, Panzeri, L, Galli, A, Artioli, G, Addis, A, Secco, M, Boaretto, E, Moreau, C, Guibert, P, Urbanová, P, Czernik, J, Goslar, T, Caroselli, M. 2017. Mortar dating methodology: Assessing recurrent issues and needs for further research. Radiocarbon 59(6):1859–1871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marzaioli, F, Lubritto, C, Nonni, S, Passariello, I, Capano, M, Terrasi, F. 2011. Mortar radiocarbon dating: Preliminary accuracy evaluation of a novel methodology. Anal Chem 83(6):2038–2045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medialdea, A, Thomsen, KJ, Murray, AS, Benito, G. 2014. Reliability of equivalent-dose determination and age-models in the OSL dating of historical and modern palaeoflood sediments. Quat Geochronol 22:11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mejdahl, V. 1985. Thermoluminescence dating based on feldspars. Nucl Tracks Rad Meas 10:133–136.Google Scholar
Murray, AS, Roberts, RG. 1997. Determining the burial time of single grains of quartz using optically stimulated luminescence. Earth Planet Sc Lett 152(1–4):163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, AS, Wintle, AG. 2000. Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol. Rad Meas 32(1):57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panzeri, L. 2013. Mortar and surface dating with optically stimulated luminescence (OSL): Innovative techniques for the age determination of buildings. Nuovo Cimento C 36C:205–216.Google Scholar
Panzeri, L, Cantu, M, Martini, M, Sibilia, E. 2017. Application of different protocols and age-models in OSL dating of earthen mortars. Geochronometria 44(1):341–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panzeri, L, Caroselli, M, Galli, A, Lugli, S, Martini, M, Sibilia, E. 2019. Mortar OSL and brick TL dating: The case study of the UNESCO World Heritage Site of Modena. Quat Geochronol 49:236–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preusser, F, Degering, D, Fuchs, M, Hilgers, A, Kadereit, A, Klasen, N, Krbetschek, M, Richter, D, Spencer, J. 2008. Luminescence dating: Basics, methods and application. EGQSJ 57:95–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regev, L, Poduska, KM, Addadi, L, Weiner, S, Boaretto, E. 2010. Distinguishing between calcites formed by different mechanisms using infrared spectrometry: Archaeological applications. J Archaeol Sci 37(12):3022–3029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatt, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):1111–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, KJ, Murray, AS, Botter-Jensen, L, Kinahan, J. 2007. Determination of burial dose in incompletely bleached fluvial samples using single grains of quartz. Radiat Meas 42(3):370–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirelli, G, Lugli, S, Galli, A, Hajdas, I, Lindroos, A, Martini, M, Maspero, F, Olsen, J, Ringbom, Å, Sibilia, E, Caroselli, M, Silvestri, E, Panzeri, L. 2020. Integrated dating of the construction and restoration of the Modena cathedral vaults (Northern Italy): preliminary Results. Radiocarbon, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toffolo, MB, Regev, L, Dubernet, S, Lefrais, Y, Boaretto, E. 2019. FTIR-based crystallinity assessment of aragonite-calcite mixtures in archaeological lime binders altered by diagenesis. Mineral-Basel 9(2).Google Scholar
Vogel, J, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE, Brown, TA. 1984. Performance of catalytically condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5(2):289–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, DW. 1971. Thermoluminescent dating using fine grains from pottery. Archaeometry 13:29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar