Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-68cz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-15T08:53:48.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

14C Variations During the Upper Pleistocene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

J C Vogel
J C Vogel*
Affiliation:
CSIR, Box 395, Pretoria, South Africa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Parallel determinations of 14C and ionium dates on a stalagmite from the Cango Caves provide evidence of variations in the 14C content of the atmosphere beyond the range of the California tree-ring sequence. During the Holocene growth period the 230Th dates are compatible with the tree-ring calibrated 14C dates. At 18,000 BP and between 30,000 and 40,000 BP the 14C ages are markedly younger than the 230Th ages, suggesting that the 14C level of the atmosphere was considerably higher at these times. Between the 230Th ages of 35,000 and 29,000 BP the 14C ages remain nearly constant at 29,500 BP, indicating that 14C production must have been drastically reduced during this period. The 14C fluctuation is greater than that predicted by Barbetti (1980) but it may be explained by postulating a substantial increase in the geomagnetic dipole field, for which there is mounting evidence.

Type
I. Natural 14C Variations
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 25 , Issue 2: 11th International Radiocarbon Conference , 1983 , pp. 213 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Barbetti, M, 1980, Geomagnetic strength over the last 50,000 years and changes in atmospheric 14C concentrations: emerging trends, in Stuiver, Minze and Kra, Renee, eds, Internatl radiocarbon conf, 10th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 22, no. 2, p 192–199.Google Scholar
Barbetti, M and Flude, K, 1979, Geomagnetic variation during the late Pleistocene period and changes in the radiocarbon time scale: Nature, v 279, p 202–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbetti, MF and McElhinny, MW, 1976, The Lake Mungo geomagnetic excursion: Phil Trans Royal Soc, A, v 281, p 515–542.Google Scholar
Lingenfelter, RE and Ramaty, R, 1970, Astrophysical and geophysical variations in C 14 production, in Olsson, I U, ed, Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology: New York, John Wiley & Sons, p 513–535.Google Scholar
Peng, T-H, Goddard, JG, and Broecker, WS, 1978, A direct comparison of 14C and 230Th ages at Searles Lake, California: Quarternary Research, v 9, p 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, 1978, Radiocarbon timescale tested against magnetic and other dating methods: Nature, v 273, p 271–274.Google Scholar
Suess, H, 1970, Bristlecone-pine calibration of the radiocarbon time-scale 5200 BC to the present, in Olsson, I U, ed, Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology: New York, John Wiley & Sons, p 303–311.Google Scholar
Vogel, JC, 1980, Accuracy in the radiocarbon time scale beyond 15,000 BP, in Stuiver, Minze and Kra, Renee, eds, Internatl radiocarbon conf, 10th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 22, no. 2, p 210–218.Google Scholar