Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T06:54:06.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What have natural and human changes wrought on the foraminifera of San Francisco Bay late Quaternary estuaries?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Amy E. Lesen  and
Jere H. Lipps
Amy E. Lesen*
Affiliation:
Dillard University, Department of Biology, 2601 Gentilly Boulevard, New Orleans, LA 70122, USA
Jere H. Lipps
Affiliation:
Museum of Paleontology and Department of Integrative Biology University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
*
⁎Corresponding author. E-mail address:[email protected] (A.E. Lesen).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study we compare the foraminifera of modern South San Francisco Bay with fossils from sediments of a previous estuary at 125 ka to provide a basis for interpreting the impact of natural and human change on the benthic ecosystem. All the species found in the Pleistocene sediments of this study are estuarine and/or shallow-water species occurring commonly in San Francisco Bay today, except for the introduced foraminifer Trochammina hadai, a native of Japan that was not found in samples taken in San Francisco Bay before 1983. The biodiversity and species composition of the fossil and modern assemblages before the introduction of T. hadai are nearly identical, suggesting that the environmental and physical changes in the 125,000-year-old and modern estuaries have not had a significant effect on the meiofauna of the Bay. In contrast, modern anthropogenic change in the form of species introductions has impacted the modern foraminiferal assemblage: T. hadai began to dominate the modern assemblage a decade after its introduction. Similar to the recorded impacts of introductions of marine metazoan invertebrate species, the dominance of T. hadai changed species proportions in the post-1980s foraminiferal assemblage, however no known extinctions in the native foraminiferal fauna occurred.

Keywords

ForaminiferaTrochammina hadaiEnvironmental changeAnthropogenic changeSan Francisco BayMeiofuanaPaleoecology
Type
Research Article
Information
Quaternary Research , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , September 2011 , pp. 211 - 219
Copyright
University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alve, E. Benthic foraminifera in sediment cores reflecting heavy metal pollution of Sorfjord, western Norway. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 21, 1 (1991). 1–19.Google Scholar
Alve, E. Benthic foraminiferal responses to estuarine pollution: a review. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 25, 3 (1995). 190–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoshima, M. Depositional environment of the Plio-Pleistocene Kakegawa Group Japan a comparative study of the fossil and the recent foraminifera. Journal of the Faculty of Science University of Tokyo Section II Geology Mineralogy Geography Geophysics 19, 5 (1979). 401–441.Google Scholar
Arnal, R.E., and Conomos, T.J. Sedimentary and foraminiferal aspects of southern San Francisco Bay. Geological Society of America Special Paper 73, (1962). 21–22.Google Scholar
Arnal, R.E., Quinterno, P.J., Conomos, T.J., and Gram, R. Trends in the distribution of recent foraminifera in San Francisco Bay. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research Special Publication 19, (1980). 17–39.Google Scholar
Atwater, B.F. Ancient processes at the site of southern San Francisco Bay: movement of the crust and changes in sea level. San Francisco Bay: The Urbanized Estuary. (1979). AAAS, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Bandy, O.L. Ecology and paleoecology of some California foraminifera, Part I. Journal of Paleontology. 27, (1953). 161–182.Google Scholar
Bernhard, J.M. Distinguishing live from dead foraminifera: methods review and proper applications. Micropaleontology 46, Supplement 1 (2000). 38–46.Google Scholar
Byrne, R., Ingram, B.L., Starratt, S., Malamud-Roam, F., Collins Joshua, J., and Conrad, M. Carbon-isotope, diatom, and pollen evidence for late Holocene salinity change in a brackish marsh in the San Francisco Estuary. Quaternary Research 55, 1 (2001). 66–76.Google Scholar
Collins, E.S., Scott, D.B., Gayes, P.T., and Medioli, F.S. Foraminifera in Winyah Bay and North Inlet marshes, South Carolina: relationship to local pollution sources. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 25, 3 (1995). 212–223.Google Scholar
Conomos, T.J. San Francisco Bay: The Urbanized Estuary. Investigations into the Natural History of San Francisco Bay and Delta With Reference to the Influence of Man (1979). Pacific Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Conomos, T.J., Smith, R.E., and Gartner, J.W. Environmental setting of San Francisco Bay California, USA. Hydrobiologia 129, 1 (1985). 1–12.Google Scholar
Danovaro, R., Fabniano, M., and Vincx, M. Meiofauna response to the Agip Abruzzo Oil Spill in subtidal sediments of the Ligurian Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin 30, 2 (1995). 133–145.Google Scholar
Erskian, M.G., and Lipps, J.H. Population dynamics of the foraminiferan Glabratella ornatissima (Cushman) in northern California [USA]. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 17, 3 (1987). 240–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagan, B.M. Before California: an archaeologist looks at our earliest inhabitants. (2004). Alta Mira Press, Walnut Creek, California. Revised edition, 399 pp. Google Scholar
Finger, K.L., Lipps, J.H., Weaver, J.C.B., and Miller, P.L. Biostratigraphy and depositional environments of calcareous microfossils in the lower Monterey Formation (Lower to Middle Miocene), Graves Creek area, central California [USA]. Micropaleontology 36, 1 (1990). 1–55.Google Scholar
Galbraith, H., Jones, R., Park, R., Clough, J., Herrod-Julius, S., Harrington, B., and Page, G. Global climate change and sea level rise: potential losses of intertidal habitat for shorebirds. Waterbirds 25, 2 (2002). 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallock, P. Symbiont-bearing foraminifera: harbingers of global change?. Micropaleontology (New York) 46, Supplement 1 (2000). 95–104.Google Scholar
Hayek, L.A.C., and Buzas, M.A. Survyeing Natural Populations. (1997). Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hurlbert, S.H. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52, 4 (1971). 577–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingle, J.C. Jr. Late Neogene paleobathymetry and paleoenvironments of Humboldt Basin, northern California. The Neogene symposium. Ter Best, H., Wornardt, W.W. Pacific Section, Soc. Econ. Paleont. Mineral. San Francisco, California (1976). 53–81.Google Scholar
Ingram, B.L. Differences in radiocarbon age between shell and charcoal from a Holocene shellmound in northern California. Quaternary Research (Orlando) 49, 1 (1998). 102–110.Google Scholar
Ingram, B.L., and Ingle, J.C. Strontium isotope ages of the Marine Merced Formation, near San Francisco, California. Quaternary Research (Orlando) 50, 2 (1998). 194–199.Google Scholar
Ingram, B.L., and Sloan, D. Strontium isotopic composition of estuarine sediments as paleosalinity–paleoclimate indicator. Science 255, (1992). 68–72.Google Scholar
Keldsen, T.J., and Wilson, K.R. The potential impacts of climate change on California clapper rail habitat. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 78, 4 SUPPL. (1997). 122 Google Scholar
Kennish, M.J. Coastal salt marsh systems in the U.S.: a review of anthropogenic impacts. Journal of Coastal Research 17, 3 (2001). 731–748.Google Scholar
Langer, M., and Long, D.J. Association of benthic foraminifera with a gammarid amphipod on tidal flats of San Francisco Bay, California. Journal of Coastal Research 10, 4 (1994). 877–883.Google Scholar
Lankford, R.R., and Phleger, F.B. Foraminifera from the nearshore turbulent zone, western North America. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 3, 3 (1973). 101–132.Google Scholar
Lesen, A.E. Relationship between benthic foraminifera and food resources in South San Francisco Bay, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 297, (2005). 131–145.Google Scholar
Lieberman, B.S. Topics in Geobiology. Paleobiogeography: Using Fossils to Study Global Change, Plate Tectonics, and Evolution. (2000). Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York.Google Scholar
Lindberg, D.R., and Lipps, J.H. Reading the Chronicle of Quaternary Temperate Rocky-Shore Faunas, pp. 161–182. Jablonski, D., Erwin, D., and Lipps, J.H. Evolutionary Paleobiology. (1996). Univ. Chicago Press, Google Scholar
Locke, J.L. Sedimentation and foraminiferal aspects on the recent sediments of San Pablo Bay. (1971). San Jose State University, San Jose, California. 100 Google Scholar
Malamud-Roam, F., and Ingram, B.L. Carbon isotopic compositions of plants and sediments of tide marshes in the San Francisco Estuary. Journal of Coastal Research 17, 1 (2001). 17–29.Google Scholar
Martinson, D.G., Pisias, N.G., Hays, J.D., Imbrie, J., Moore, T.C.J., and Shackleton, N.J. Age dating and the orbital theory of the Ice Ages: development of a high resolution 0 to 300,000-year chronostratigraphy. Quaternary Research 27, (1987). 1–29.Google Scholar
McCormick, J.M., Severin, K.P., and Lipps, J.H. Summer and winter distribution of foraminifera in Tomales Bay, northern California. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research Special Publication 32, (1994). 69–101.Google Scholar
McDonald, J.A., and Diediker, P.L. A preliminary report on the foraminifera of San Francisco Bay, California. Micropaleontology Bulletin 2, (1930). 33–37.Google Scholar
McGann, M. Vertical distribution of foraminifers, including the non-indigenous species Trochammina hadai, in south San Francisco Bay. Fourth Biennial State of the Estuary Conference. (1999). 77 Google Scholar
McGann, M. High-resolution faunal, isotopic, and trace metal records from Holocene estuarine deposits of San Francisco Bay, California. Journal of Coastal Research 24, 5 (2008). 1092–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, M., and Sloan, D. Recent introduction of the foraminifer Trochammina hadai Uchio into San Francisco Bay, California, USA. Marine Micropaleontology 28, 1 (1996). 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, M., Sloan, D., and Cohen, A.N. Invasion by a Japanese marine microorganism in western North America. Hydrobiologia 421, 1–3 (2000). 25–30. (Type D 1 AB to see abstract) Google Scholar
McKinney, M.L., Lockwood, J.L., and Frederick, D.R. Does ecosystem and evolutionary stability include rare species?. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 127, 1–4 (1996). 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Means, K.D. Sediments and Foraminifera of Richardson Bay, California. (1965). University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. 83 Google Scholar
Nagy, J., and Alve, E. Temporal changes in foraminiferal faunas and impact of pollution in Sandebukta, Oslo Fjord [Norway]. Marine Micropaleontology 12, 2 (1987). 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natland, M.L. Paleoecology of West Coast Tertiary sediments. Geological Society of America Memoir 67, (1957). 543–572.Google Scholar
Pataki, D.E. Atmospheric CO2, climate and evolution: lessons from the past. The New Phytologist 154, 1 (2002). 10–12.Google Scholar
Patrick, W.H.J., and Delaune, R.D. Subsidence accretion and sea level rise in South San Francisco Bay California USA Marshes. Limnology and Oceanography 35, 6 (1990). 1389–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phleger, F.B. Ecology and Distribution of Recent Foraminifera. (1960). The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Phleger, F.B., and Ewing, G.C. Sedimentology and oceanography of coastal lagoons in Baja California. Mexico. Geological Society of America Bulletin 73, (1962). 145–182.Google Scholar
Quinterno, P.J. Distribution of recent foraminifera in Central and South San Francisco Bay. Department of Geology. (1968). San Jose State College, San Jose. 83 Google Scholar
Resig, J.M., Ming, K., and Miyake, S. Foraminiferal ecology, Ala Wai Canal, Hawai'i. Pacific Science 49, 4 (1995). 341–366.Google Scholar
Setty, M.G.A.P., and Nigam, R. Benthic foraminifera as pollution indices in the marine environment of west coast of India. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 89, 3 (1984). 421–436.Google Scholar
Slater, R.A. Sedimentary environments in Suisun Bay, California. (1965). University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. 101 Google Scholar
Sliter, W.V. Cretaceous planktic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Calera Limestone, northern California, USA. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 29, 4 (1999). 318–339.Google Scholar
Sloan, D. Foraminifera of Sangamon(?) estuarine deposits beneath Central San Francisco Bay, California. Quaternary Depositional Environments of the Pacific Coast, Pacific Coast Paleogeography Symposium 4, (1980). 1–12.Google Scholar
Sloan, D. Ecostratigraphic Study of Sangamon Sediments beneath Central San Francisco Bay. Department of Paleontology. (1981). University of California, Berkeley, California. 338 Google Scholar
Sloan, D. The Yerba Buena mud; record of the last-interglacial predecessor of San Francisco Bay, California. Geological Society of America Bulletin 104, 6 (1992). 716–727.Google Scholar
Sloan, D. Use of foraminiferal biostratigraphy in mitigating pollution and seismic problems, San Francisco, California. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 25, 3 (1995). 260–266.Google Scholar
Stewart, R.E., and Stewart, K.C. Notes on the foraminifera of the type Merced at Seven Mile Beach, San Mateo County, California. San Diego Natural History Transactions 7, 21 (1933). 259–272.Google Scholar
Thierstein, H.R. Paleooceanography global change in the history of the Earth. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zuerich 132, 2 (1987). 88–103.Google Scholar
Travis, J., and Futuyma, D.J. Global Change: Lessons from and for Evolutionary Biology. Kareiva, P.M., Kingsolver, J.G., and Huey, R.B. Biotic interactions and global change. (1993). Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA. 251–261.Google Scholar
Tsujimoto, A., Nomura, R., Yasuhara, M., Yamazaki, H., and Yoshikawa, S. Impact of eutrophication on shallow marine benthic foraminifers over the last 150 years in Osaka Bay, Japan. Marine Micropaleontology 60, 4 (2006). 258–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchio, T. Ecology of living benthic foraminifera from the San Diego, California area. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research Special Publication 5, (1960). 1–72.Google Scholar
USGS San Francisco Bay Water Quality data. (2003). USGS, Menlo Park, CA. http://sfbay.wr.usgs.gov/access/wqdata/index.html Google Scholar
van Geen, A., and Luoma, S.N. The impact of human activities on sediments of San Francisco Bay, California: an overview. Marine Chemistry 64, 1–2 (1999). 1–6.Google Scholar
van Geen, A., and Luoma, S.N. A record of estuarine water contamination from the Cd content of foraminiferal tests in San Francisco Bay, California. Marine Chemistry 64, 1–2 (1999). 57–69.Google Scholar
van Geen, A., Luoma, S.N., Fuller, C.C., Anima, R., Clifton, H.E., and Trumbore, S. Evidence from cadmium calcium ratios in foraminifera for greater upwelling off California 4000 years ago. Nature (London) 358, 6381 (1992). 54–56.Google Scholar
Wagner, D.B. Environmental history of San Francisco Bay with emphasis on foraminifera paleontology and clay minerology. Department of Paleontology. (1978). University of California, Berkeley. 274 Google Scholar
Whitfield, A.K. Fish species diversity in Southern African estuarine systems: an evolutionary perspective. Environmental Biology of Fishes 40, 1 (1994). 37–48.Google Scholar
Yanko, V., Ahmad, M., and Kaminski, M. Morphological deformities of benthic foraminiferal tests in response to pollution by heavy metals: implications for pollution monitoring. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 28, 3 (1998). 177–200.Google Scholar
Yanko, V., Kronfeld, J., and Flexer, A. Response of benthic foraminifera to various pollution sources: implications for pollution monitoring. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 24, 1 (1994). 1–17.Google Scholar