Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T09:04:44.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The use of magnetic field excursions in stratigraphy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ronald T. Merrill*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Box 35-1650, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1650, USA
Phillip L. McFadden
Affiliation:
Geoscience Australia, GPO Box 378, Canberra Act 2601, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail address:[email protected] (R.T. Merrill).

Abstract

The use of magnetic field excursions in stratigraphy is difficult primarily because the excursion field is complex and not dominantly dipolar. In contrast with a reversal, which is a global event, an excursion can be evidenced at one location but not another. Although this does not by itself rule out the use of excursions in stratigraphy, it does limit the geographic area over which they may be correlated. We recommend, somewhat conservatively, that excursions can be used to correlate between sedimentary cores separated by angular distances of less than 30° on Earth's surface. Correlation between cores separated by more than 45° should not be attempted.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbetti, M.F., McElhinny, M.W., (1972). Evidence for a geomagnetic excursion 30 000 yr. B.P.. Nature 239, 327330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, J.M., Johnston, H., Olley, J., Prescott, J., Roberts, R., Shawcross, W., Spooner, N., (2003). New ages for human occupation and climatic change at Lake Mungo, Australia. Nature 421, 837840.Google Scholar
Brunhes, B., (1906). Recherches sur la direction d'aimantation des roches volcaniques. Journal de Physique et le Radium, Series 4 5, 705724.Google Scholar
Brunhes, B., David, P., (1901). Sur la direction d'aimantation dans des couches d'argile transformée en brique par des colées de lave. Compte Rendu de L'Académie des Sciences, Paris 137, 155157.Google Scholar
Champion, D.E., Lanphere, M.A., Kuntz, M.A., (1988). Evidence for a new geomagnetic reversal from lava flows in Idaho: discussion of short polarity reversals in the Brunhes and late Matuyama polarity chrons. Journal of Geophysical Research 93, 1166711680.Google Scholar
Channel, J.E.T., Mazaud, A., Sullivan, P., Turner, S., Raymo, M.E., (2002). Geomagnetic excursions and paleointensities in the Matuyama Chron at ocean drilling program sites 983 and 984 (Iceland basin). Journal of Geophysical Research 107, (doi:10.1029/2001JB000491).Google Scholar
Cox, A., Doell, R.R., Dalrymple, B., (1963). Geomagnetic polarity epochs and Pleistocene geochronology. Nature 198, 10491051.Google Scholar
Guyodo, Y., Valet, J.-P., (1996). Relative variations in geomagnetic intensity from sedimentary cores: the past 200,000 years. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 143, 2336.Google Scholar
Guyodo, Y., Valet, J.-P., (1999). Global changes in intensity of the Earth's magnetic field during the past 800 kyr. Nature 399, 249252.Google Scholar
Heller, R., Merrill, R.T., McFadden, P.L., (2002). The variation of intensity of earth's magnetic field with time. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 131, 237249.Google Scholar
Kennett, J., (1980). Magnetic Stratigraphy of Sediments. Dowden, Hutchingson and Ross, Stroudsburg, PA., 438.Google Scholar
Kono, M., Roberts, P., (2002). Recent geodynamo simulations and observations of the geomagnetic field. Reviews of Geophysics 40, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langereis, C.G., Dekkers, M.J., de Lange, G.J., Paterne, M., van Santvoort, P.J.M., (1997). Magnetostratigraphy and astronomical calibration of the last 1.1 Myr from an eastern Mediterranean piston core and dating of short events in the Brunhes. Geophysical Journal International 129, 7594.Google Scholar
Lund, S.P., Acton, G., Clement, B., Hastedt, M., Okada, M., Williams, T., (1998). Geomagnetic field excursions occurred often during the last million years. EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 78, 14 S178S179.(Spring Meet. Supplement).Google Scholar
McDougall, I., Tarling, D.H., (1963). Dating of polarity zones in the Hawaiian Islands. Nature 200, 5456.Google Scholar
McElhinny, M.W., Senanayake, W.E., (1982). Variations in the geomagnetic dipole. 1. The past 50,000 years. Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity 34, 3951.Google Scholar
Merrill, R.T., McFadden, P.L., (1994). Geomagnetic field stability: reversal events and excursions. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 121, 5769.Google Scholar
Merrill, R.T., McElhinny, M.W., McFadden, P.L., (1996). The Magnetic Field of the Earth: Paleomagnetism, the Core, and the Deep Mantle. Academic Press, San Diego, CA., 531.Google Scholar
Merrill, R.T., McFadden, P.L., (1999). Geomagnetic polarity transitions. Reviews of Geophysics 37, 201226.Google Scholar
Opdyke, N.D., Channell, J.E.T., (1996). Magnetic stratigraphy. Academic Press, San Diego., 341.Google Scholar
Opdyke, N.D., Glass, B.P., Hays, J.D., Foster, J.H., (1966). Paleomagnetic study of Antarctica deep-sea cores. Science 154, 349357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roperch, P., Bonhommet, N., Levi, S., (1988). Paleointensity of the earth's magnetic field during the Laschamp excursion and its geomagnetic implications. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 88, 209219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, B.S., Relle, M.K., Hoffman, K.A., Battle, A., Laj, C., Guillou, H., Carracedo, J.C., (2002). Ar/Ar ages from transitional magnetized lavas on La Palma, Canary Islands, and the geomagnetic instability timescale. Journal of Geophysical Research 107, B11 2307(doi:10.1029/2001JB001613).Google Scholar
Whitney, J., Johnson, H.P., Levi, S., Evans, B., (1971). Investigations of some magnetic and mineralogical properties of the Laschamp and Olby flows, France. Quaternary Research 1, 511522.Google Scholar