Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:36:42.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strontium Isotope Ages of the Marine Merced Formation, near San Francisco, California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

B. Lynn Ingram  and
James C. Ingle
B. Lynn Ingram
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720
James C. Ingle
Affiliation:
Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The strontium isotopic compositions of foraminifers ( Elphidiella hannaiwere determined to refine the age of coastal sediments of the Merced Formation and to evaluate the relation between transgressive–regressive cycles and Pleistocene glacio-eustatic sea-level fluctuations. Relatively good age resolution (± 0.1 myr) is possible in the upper part of the section. The Sr isotope ages provide strong supporting evidence for the fission track ages of an ash layer at the top of the formation (0.45 myr), as well as recent age estimates for the mammoth fossil of ∼0.45 myr. Sr isotope ages in the upper part of the section also confirm that marine/nonmarine cyclic sedimentation in the Merced Formation is controlled by glacial–interglacial cycles. Good age resolution for the lower part of the section is not possible, due to little variation of the87Sr/86Sr ratio in global sea water between 2.4 and 4.3 myr. The age of the base of the formation is constrained only between 2.4 and 4.8 myr. Sediment accumulation rates in the upper portion of the Merced Formation (between 0 and 720 m) are significantly higher than those calculated for the basal portion (between 720 and 1670 m). The change in accumulation rate may be due to increased continental weathering rates and/or increased tectonic subsidence beginning about 0.8 myr ago.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Quaternary Research , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , September 1998 , pp. 194 - 199
Copyright
University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addicott, W.O. (1969). Late Pliocene molluscs from San Francisco Peninsula, California, and their paleogeographic significance. California Academy of Science Proceedings 37, 57–93.Google Scholar
Capo, R.C., and DePaolo, D.J. (1990). Seawater strontium isotopic variations from 2.5 million years ago to the present. Science 249, 51–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clifton, H.E., and Hunter, R.E. (1987). The Merced Formation and related beds—A mile-thick succession of late Cenozoic coastal and shelf deposits in the seacliffs southwest of San Francisco, California. Geological Society of America Centennial Field Guide—Cordilleran Section 257–262.Google Scholar
Clifton, H.E., Hunter, R.E., and Gardner, J.V. (1988). Analysis of eustatic, tectonic and sedimentologic influences on trangressive and regressive cycles in the late Cenozoic Merced Formation, San Francisco, California. New Perspectives in Basin Analysis Springer-Verlag, New York.p. 109–128Google Scholar
DePaolo, D.J. (1986). Detailed record of the Neogene Sr isotopic evolution of seawater from DSDP Site 590B. Geology 14, 103–106.Google Scholar
Hall, N.T. (1965). Petrology of the Type Merced Group, San Francisco Peninsula, California..Google Scholar
Hall, N.T. (1966). Fleishacker Zoo to Mussel Rock (Merced Formation)—A Plio-Pleistocene nature walk. California Division of Mines and Geology Mineral Information Service 19, S22–S25.Google Scholar
Ingram, B.L., and Sloan, D. (1992). Strontium isotopic composition of estuarine sediments as paleosalinity-paleoclimate indicator. Science 255, 68–72.Google Scholar
Ingram, B.L., and DePaolo, D.J. (1993). A 4,300-yr record of salinity and paleo-streamflow in San Francisco Bay, California. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 119, 103–119.Google Scholar
Lawson, A.C. (1893). The past-Pliocene diastrophism of the coast of southern California. University of California Publications, Department of Geology, Bulletin 1, 115–160.Google Scholar
Lucas, S.G. (1996). The Thornton Beach mammoth: Consistency of numerical age and morphology. Quaternary Research 45, 332–333.Google Scholar
Madden, C.T. (1980). Earliest isotopically dated Mammuthus . Quaternary Research 13, 147–150.Google Scholar
Meyer, C.E., Sarna-Wojcicki, A.M., Hillhouse, J.W., Woodward, M.J., Slate, J.L., and Sorg, D.H. (1991). Fission-track age (400,000 yr) of the Rockland tephra, based on inclusion of zircon grains lacking fission tracks. Quaternary Research 35, 367–382.Google Scholar
Poore, R.Z. (1981). Temporal and spatial distribution of ice-rafted mineral grains in Pliocene sediments of the North Atlantic: Implications for late Cenozoic climatic history.Warme, J.E., Douglas, R.G., Winterer, E.L. The Deep Sea Drilling Project: A Decade of Progress. Society for Economic Paleontology and Mineralogy, 505–515.Google Scholar
Sarna-Wojcicki, A.M., Meyer, C.E., Bowman, H.R., Hall, N.T., Russell, P.C., Woodward, M.J., and Slate, J.L. (1985). Correlations of the Rockland ash bed, a 400,000-year-old stratigraphic marker in northern California and western Nevada, and implications for middle Pleistocene paleogeography of central California. Quaternary Geology 23, 236–257.Google Scholar
Sarna-Wojcicki, A.M., Meyer, C.E., Hillhouse, J.W., Hall, N.T., and Curtis, G.H. (1996). Age of the Thornton Beach, California, mammoth fossil updated. Quaternary Research 45, 327–331.Google Scholar
Sarna-Wojcicki, A.M., Lajoie, C.E., Meyer, C.E., Adam, D.P., and Rieck, H.J. (1991). Tephrochronologic Correlation of upper Neogene Sediments along the Pacific Margin, Conterminous United States. Geological Society of America, Boulder.CrossRefGoogle Scholar