Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:23:10.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rotation Measure and Opacity Asymmetry in 2134+004

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

M. Mutoh
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Science University of Tokyo, Kagurazaka, Sinjytuku, Tokyo 162-0833. [email protected] National Astronomical Observatory, Osawa 2-21-1, Mitaka, Tokyo [email protected]
M. Inoue
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatory, Osawa 2-21-1, Mitaka, Tokyo [email protected]
S. Kameno
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatory, Osawa 2-21-1, Mitaka, Tokyo [email protected]
K. Asada
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatory, Osawa 2-21-1, Mitaka, Tokyo [email protected] Department of Astronomical Science, Sokendai, Osawa 2-21-1, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Based on the free–free absorption (FFA) model of gigahertz peaked spectrum (GPS) sources, we explain both Faraday rotation asymmetry and opacity asymmetry consistently between two components of a GPS quasar 2134+004. The FFA model assumes dense plasma around the central core to produce FFA, and the difference of path lengths in the plasma toward each component could cause these asymmetries. The component that is closer to the observer has a shorter path length, and consequently, smaller opacity of FFA and lower Faraday rotation. In a simple case, the ratio of Faraday rotation between two components is a function of the ratio of path length, and is the same as the ratio of opacity. Then these two ratios are shown to be essentially the same by our observations. We could thus distinguish between near-side and far-side components by the asymmetries.

Type
GPS/CSS Workshop
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 2003

References

Asada, K., Inoue, M., Uchida, Y., Kameno, S., Fujisawa, K., Iguchi, S., & Mutoh, M. 2002, PASJ, 54, L39 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicknell, G. V., Dopita, M. A., & O'Dea, C. P. O. 1997, ApJ, 485, 112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kameno, S., Horiuchi, S., Shen, Z.-Q., Inoue, M., Kobayashi, H., Hirabayashi, H., & Murata, Y. 2000, PASJ, 52, 209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kameno, S., Sawada-Satoh, S., Inoue, M., Shen, Z.-Q., & Wajima, K. 2001, PASJ, 53, 169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutoh, M., Inoue, M., Kameno, S., Asada, K., Fujisawa, K., & Uchida, Y. 2002, PASJ, 54, 131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dea, C. P. 1998, PASP, 110, 493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauliny-Toth, I. I. K., Alberdi, A., Zensus, J. A., & Cohen, M. H. 1989, RvMA, 2, 177 Google Scholar
Snellen, I. A., Schilizzi, R. T., Miley, G. K., de Bruyn, A. G., Bremer, M. N., & Röttgering, H. J. A. 2000, MNRAS, 319, 445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. B. 2000, ApJ, 533, 95 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. C., Dhawan, V., Romney, J. D., Kellermann, K. I., & Vermeulen, R. C. 2000, ApJ, 530, 233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar