Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:21:04.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Projection Effects and Radio Source Morphology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

J. E. Reynolds*
Affiliation:
School, of Physics, University of Sydney

Extract

Since the discovery of the first ‘head-tail’ radio source (Ryle and Windram, 1968) extensive radio surveys of clusters of galaxies have revealed a surprisingly diverse range of source morphology. In additions to the familiar symmetric double-lobed shape, several other morphological types are now recognised; these are presumed to be due to interaction between the source and a relatively dense, hot plasma pervading rich clusters. In particular, rapid motion of a radio galaxy with respect to this inter-galactic medium appears to produce a ‘bent-double’ shape, or in more severe cases, a ‘double-tail’ or ‘head-tail’ shape. In such cases, the source no longer has the simple symmetry of ‘ordinary’ double structure and it is clear that the attitude of the source with respect to the line of sight may markedly affect what is observed. Results and details are given below of a simple computer code used to simulate the appearance of a hypothetical bent-double source seen in projection. It is emphasised that the model has been chosen as one that can represent in a simple way many of the observed morphological forms and is not based on any physical theory of radiation or emission processes.

Type
Contributions
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ryle, M., and Windram, M. D., Mon Not. R. Astron. Soc., 138, 1 (1968).Google Scholar
Simon, A. J. B., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 184, 537 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentjin, E. A., Astron. Astrophys., 78, 367 (1979).Google Scholar