Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:09:08.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Local HI: Constraints on the Evolution of the HI Content of the Universe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

F. H. Briggs*
Affiliation:
Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, Postbus 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands; [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Analyses of QSO absorption lines show that the HI content has evolved over the redshift range z = 5 to z = 0. The 21-cm line measurements of the z = 0 HI content avoid several biases inherent in the absorption-line technique, such as the influence of evolving dust content in the absorbers, and will produce a reliable measure to anchor theories of galaxy evolution. Examples of important questions to be addressed by local HI surveys are: (1) Is there a significant population of gas-rich galaxies or intergalactic clouds that is missing from the census of optically selected galaxies? (2) Is there an adequate reservoir of neutral gas to substantially prolong star formation at its present rate? (3) Are there massive objects of such low HI column density that they can have escaped detection in the ‘unbiased’ HI surveys that have been conducted so far?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1997

References

Bahcall, J. N., et al. 1993, ApJS, 87, 1 Google Scholar
Bartelmann, M., & Loeb, A. 1996, ApJ, 457, 529 Google Scholar
Boyle, B. J., & Di Matteo, T. 1995, MNRAS, 277, L63 Google Scholar
Briggs, F. H. 1990, AJ, 100, 999 Google Scholar
Briggs, F. H., & Sorar, E. 1996, in Cold Gas at High Redshift, ed. M. N. Bremer et al. (Dordrecht: Kluwer), p. 285 Google Scholar
Briggs, F. H., Sorar, E., Kraan-Korteweg, R. C., & van Driel, W. 1997, PASA, 14, 37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlton, J. C., Salpeter, E. E., & Linder, S. M. 1994, ApJ, 430, L29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chengalur, J. N., Giovanelli, R., & Haynes, M. P. 1995, AJ, 109, 2415 Google Scholar
Corbelli, E., Schneider, S. E., & Salpeter, E. E. 1989, AJ, 97, 390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. S., Colless, M., Broadhurst, T., Heyl, J., Glazebrook, K. 1996, MNRAS, 280, 235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fall, S. M., & Pei, Y. C. 1989, ApJ, 337, 7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giovanelli, R., & Haynes, M. P. 1989, ApJ, 346, L5 Google Scholar
Giovanelli, R., Scodeggio, M., Solanes, J. M., Haynes, M. P., Arce, H., & Sakai, S. 1995, AJ, 109, 1451 Google Scholar
Glazebrook, K., Ellis, R., Santiago, B., & Griffiths, R. 1995, MNRAS, 275, L19 Google Scholar
Haehnelt, M. G., Steinmetz, M., & Rauch, M. 1995, ApJ, 465, L95 Google Scholar
Henning, P. A. 1995, ApJ, 450, 578 Google Scholar
Hewett, P. C., Foltz, C. B., & Chaffee, F. H. 1993, ApJ, 406, L43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C., Tamblyn, P., & Congdon, C. W. 1994, ApJ, 435, 22 (KTC)Google Scholar
Lanzetta, K. M., Wolfe, A. M., & Turnshek, A. M. 1995, ApJ, 440, 435 Maloney, P. 1993, ApJ, 414, 41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pei, Y. C., & Fall, S. M. 1995, ApJ, 454, 69 Google Scholar
Petitjean, P., Webb, J. K, Rauch, M., Carswell, R. F., & Lanzetta, K. M. 1993, MNRAS, 262, 499 Google Scholar
Rao, S. M., & Briggs, F. H. 1993, ApJ, 419, 515 Google Scholar
Rao, S. M., Turnshek, D. A., & Briggs, F. H. 1995, ApJ, 449, 488 Google Scholar
Rauch, M., & Haehnelt, M. G. 1995, MNRAS, 275, L76 Google Scholar
Schmidt, M., Schneider, D. P., & Gunn, J. E. 1994, AJ, 107, 1245 Google Scholar
Schneider, S. E. 1989, ApJ, 343, 94 Google Scholar
Schneider, S. E. 1997, PASA, 14, 99 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorar, E. 1994, PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh Google Scholar
Smette, A., Surdej, J., Shaver, P. A., Foltz, C. B., Chaffee, F. H., Weymann, R. J., Williams, R. E., & Magain, P. 1992, ApJ, 389, 39 Google Scholar
Smette, A., Claeskens, J. F., & Surdej, J. 1995 a, in Astrophysical Implications of Gravitational Lensing, Proe. IAU Symp. 173, ed. C. S. Kochanek & J. N. Hewitt (Dordrecht: Kluwer), p. 99 Google Scholar
Smette, A., Robertson, J. G., Shaver, P. A., Reimers, D., Wisotski, L., & Koehler, T. 1995 b, A&AS, 113, 199 Google Scholar
Smette, A., et al. 1997, A&A, submittedGoogle Scholar
Steidel, C. C. 1990, ApJS, 72, 1 Google Scholar
Storrie-Lombardi, L. J., McMahon, R. G., Irwin, M. J., & Hazard, C. 1996, ApJ, 468, 121 Google Scholar
Sunyaev, R. A. 1969, ApJ, 3, 33 Google Scholar
Szomoru, A., Guhathakurta, P., van Gorkom, J. H., Knapen, J. H., Weinberg, D. H., & Fruchter, A. S. 1994, AJ, 108, 491 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szomoru, A., van Gorkom, J. H., Gregg, M. D., & Strauss, M. A. 1996, AJ, 111, 2150 Google Scholar
Taylor, C. L., Brinks, E., & Skillman, E. D. 1993, AJ, 105, 128 Google Scholar
Taylor, C. L., Thomas, D. L., Brinks, E., & Skillman, E. D. 1996, ApJS, 107, 143 Google Scholar
Webster, R. L., Francis, P. J., Peterson, B. A., Drinkwater, M. J., & Masei, F. J. 1995, Nature, 375, 469 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, A. M., Turnshek, D. A., Smith, H. E., & Cohen, R. D. 1986, ApJS, 61, 249 Google Scholar
Zwaan, M., Sprayberry, D., & Briggs, F. H. 1997, PASA, 14, 117 Google Scholar