Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:47:46.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intra-Pixel Sensitivity Variation and Charge Transfer Inefficiency — Results of CCD Scans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Hiroyuki Toyozumi  and
Michael C. B. Ashley
Hiroyuki Toyozumi
Affiliation:
Department of Astrophysics and Optics, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia
Michael C. B. Ashley*
Affiliation:
Department of Astrophysics and Optics, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia
*
BCorresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The efficiency with which a charge-coupled device (CCD) detects photons depends, amongst other factors, on where within a pixel the photon hits. To explore this effect we have made detailed scans across a pixel for a front-illuminated three-phase EEV05-20 CCD using the standard astronomical B, V, R, and I colour filters. Pixel response functions and photometric sensitivity maps are derived from the scan images. Nonlinear charge transfer inefficiency (CTI) effects were observed and corrected for. The resulting images clearly show the intra-pixel sensitivity variations (IPSVs) due to the CCD electrode structure, and its dependence on wavelength. We briefly comment on the implications of IPSVs and CTI for high-precision photometry and astrometry.

Keywords

techniques: photometricinstrumentation: detectors
Type
Research Article
Information
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , Volume 22 , Issue 3: Featuring Gravity Workshop 2004 , 2005 , pp. 257 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 2005

References

Banghart, E. K., Lavine, J. P., Trabka, E. A., Nelson, E. T., & Burkey, B. C. 1991, ITED, 38(5), 1162 Google Scholar
Bessell, M. S. 1990, PASP, 102, 1181 Google Scholar
Carter, B. D., Ashley, M. C. B., Sun, Y.-S., & Storey, J. W. V. 1992, PASA, 10, 74 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janesick, J. R. 2001, Scientific Charge-Coupled Devices (Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press)Google Scholar
Jorden, P. R., Deltorn, J.-M., & Oates, A. P. 1994, Proc. SPIE, 2198, 836 Google Scholar
Kavaldjiev, D., & Ninkov, Z. 1997, Proc. SPIE, 3019, 42 Google Scholar
Kavaldjiev, D., & Ninkov, Z. 1998, OptEn, 37, 948 Google Scholar
Kavaldjiev, D., & Ninkov, Z. 2001, OptEn, 40, 162 Google Scholar
Marshall, C. J., & Marshall, P. W. 2003, http://radhome.gsfc.nasa.gov/radhome/papers/CCD_Lessons_Learned.pdf Google Scholar
Piterman, A., & Ninkov, Z. 2000, Proc. SPIE, 3965, 289 Google Scholar
Piterman, A., & Ninkov, Z. 2001, Proc. SPIE, 4306, 280 Google Scholar
Piterman, A., & Ninkov, Z. 2002, OptEn, 41, 1192 Google Scholar