Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:20:16.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Giant Cells and the Solar Cycle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

P. R. Wilson
P. R. Wilson*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Sydney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Despite the success of the Babcock-Leighton model in explaining some phenomena of the solar cycle, e.g. Hale’s polarity law and Maunder’s butterfly diagram, it has recently encountered a number of observational and theoretical difficulties. The observational difficulties are centred around the different behaviour of bi-polar magnetic regions (BMRs) and uni-polar magnetic regions (UMRs). Babcock explains BMRs as the surface eruptions of toroidal fields wound by the differential rotation and it is clear that in their subsequent evolution and decay they are obviously influenced by this effect. However, UMRs display a sector structure in which the boundaries between regions of opposite polarities appear to be quite unaffected by the differential rotation but closely related to the interplanetary field sectors. Another feature of solar activity unexplained by the Babcock theory is the tendency of sunspots, flares, etc. to reappear at the same latitude during a cycle. Warwick has observed that proton flares show a preference for particular latitudes which may extend over several cycles. Again Bumba et al. have observed that new cycle fields tend to appear in longitude regions where old cycle fields are still visible.

Type
Contributions
Information
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , October 1972 , pp. 144 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Warwick, C. S., Astrophys. J., 141, 500 (1965).Google Scholar
2 Bumba, V., Howard, R., Matres, M. J. and Soru-Iscovici, I., I.A.U. Symposium No. 35, Structure and Development of Solar Active Regions (ed. Kiepenheuer, K. O.), 13 (1968).Google Scholar
3 Simon, G. W. and Weiss, N. O., Zs. f. Astrophysik, 69, 435 (1968).Google Scholar
4 Davies-Jones, R. P. and Gilman, P. A., Solar Phys., 12, 3 (1970).Google Scholar
5 Piddington, J. H., Solar Phys., 21, 4 (1970).Google Scholar
6 Wilson, P. R., in preparation (1972).Google Scholar
7 Newkirk, G. and Altschuler, M., Solar Phys., 13, 131 (1970).Google Scholar
8 Weiss, N. O., Proc. Roy. Soc, A. 293, 310 (1966).Google Scholar
9 Wilson, P. R., submitted to Solar Phys (1972).Google Scholar