Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:39:06.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An HI Selected Sample of Galaxies: The HI Mass Function and the Surface Brightness Distribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2016

Martin Zwaan ,
Frank Briggs  and
David Sprayberry
Martin Zwaan
Affiliation:
Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, PO Box 800, NL-9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands; [email protected].
Frank Briggs
Affiliation:
Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, PO Box 800, NL-9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands; [email protected].
David Sprayberry
Affiliation:
Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, PO Box 800, NL-9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands; [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Results from the Arecibo HI Strip Survey, an unbiased extragalactic HI survey, combined with optical and 21 cm follow-up observations, determine the HI mass function and the cosmological mass density of HI at the present epoch. Both are consistent with earlier estimates, computed for the population of optically selected galaxies. This consistency occurs because, although the distribution of optical central surface brightnesses among galaxies is flat, we fail to find a population of galaxies with central surface brightnesses fainter than 24 B-mag arcsec−2, even though there is no observational selection against them.

Type
HI in the Local Universe
Information
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , 1997 , pp. 126 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1997

References

Briggs, F. H. 1990, AJ, 100, 999 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, F. H. 1997, PASA, 14, 000Google Scholar
Briggs, F. H., & Rao, S. 1993, ApJ, 417, 494 Google Scholar
Disney, M. J. 1976, Nature, 263, 573 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGaugh, S. S. 1996, MNRAS, 280, 337 Google Scholar
Mo, H. J., McGaugh, S. S., & Bothun, G. D. 1994, MNRAS, 267, 129 Google Scholar
Rao, S., & Briggs, F. 1993, ApJ, 419, 515 Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. 1968, ApJ, 151, 393 Google Scholar
Sorar, E. 1994, PhD Thesis, University of Pittsburgh Google Scholar
Szomoru, A., Guhathakurta, P., van Gorkom, J. H., Knapen, J. H., Weinberg, D. H., & Fruchter, A. S. 1994, AJ, 108, 491 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szomoru, A., van Gorkom, J. H., Gregg, M. D., & Strauss, M. A. 1996, AJ, 111, 2150 Google Scholar
Tyson, N. D., & Scalo, J. M. 1988, ApJ, 329, 618 Google Scholar
Weinberg, D. H. 1991, ApJ, 372, L13 Google Scholar