Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T00:09:18.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using research on the obesity pandemic as a guide to a unified vision of nutrition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Barry M Popkin
Barry M Popkin*
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 123 W. Franklin Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27516-3997, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective

To focus on factors that play a major role in our rapid, global nutritional changes.

Design

A range of studies are summarised: these show how an understanding of social, economic and technological change at the global, national and community levels affects diet, activity, and body composition patterns and trends. These studies are used to demonstrate the value of the key global, national, community, household and individual factors that should define the field of nutrition.

Setting

The focus is global.

Result

Large shifts have occurred in diet and in physical activity patterns – particularly in the last one or two decades of the twentieth century. These changes are reflected in nutritional outcomes such as changes in average stature, body composition and morbidity. Understanding the rapidity of these changes and the underlying factors at the global, national and community levels is critical for creating a science of nutrition that can prevent disease and sustain the health and integrity of humans.

Conclusion

The vision of the nutrition field is one where scholars who work on many levels will intersect; equal weight in the nutrition profession will be provided to all dimensions as they are welcomed into the field of nutrition – particularly those that will directly or indirectly affect dietary patterns, physical activity patterns, and energetics. This vision of the nutrition field is one where scholars from a range of disciplines and perspectives meet to work together with the goal being a focus on improving nutritional status and the human condition.

Keywords

Nutrition transitionMacroeconomic factorsEnvironmental factorsPhysical activityBody composition
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 8 , Issue 6a , September 2005 , pp. 724 - 729
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2005

References

1Popkin, BM, Nielsen, SJ. The sweetening of the world's diet. Obesity Research 2003; 11: 1325–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Drewnowski, A, Popkin, BM. The nutrition transition: new trends in the global diet. Nutrition Reviews 1997; 55: 31–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Popkin, BM, Lu, B, Zhai, F. Understanding the nutrition transition: measuring rapid dietary changes in transitional countries. Public Health Nutrition 2002; 5: 947–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Popkin, BM. The nutrition transition in the developing world. Development Policy Review 2003; 21: 581–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Popkin, BM. The nutrition transition and its health implications in lower income countries. Public Health Nutrition 1998; 1: 5–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Bell, AC, Ge, K, Popkin, BM. Weight gain and its predictors in Chinese adults. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 2001; 25: 1079–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Paeratakul, S, Popkin, BM, Keyou, G, Adair, LS, Stevens, J. Changes in diet and physical activity affect the body mass index of Chinese adults. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 1998; 22: 424–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Bell, AC, Ge, K, Popkin, BM. The road to obesity or the path to prevention? Motorized transportation and obesity in China. Obesity Research 2002; 10: 277–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Lanningham-Foster, L, Nysse, LJ, Levine, JA. Labor saved, calories lost: the energetic impact of domestic labor-saving devices. Obesity Research 2003; 11: 1178–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Nielsen, SJ, Siega-Riz, AM, Popkin, BM. Trends in energy intake in the US between 1977 and 1996: similar shifts seen across age groups. Obesity Research 2002; 10: 370–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Nielsen, SJ, Siega-Riz, AM, Popkin, BM. Trends in food locations and sources among adolescents and young adults. Preventive Medicine 2002; 35: 107–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Popkin, BM. An overview on the nutrition transition and its health implications: the Bellagio meeting. Public Health Nutrition 2002; 5: 93–103.Google ScholarPubMed
13Wang, Y, Monteiro, C, Popkin, BM. Trends of overweight and underweight in children and adolescents in the United States, Brazil, China, and Russia. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2002; 75: 971–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Lobstein, T, Baur, L, Uauy, R. Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. Obesity Reviews 2004; 5(Suppl. 1): 4–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Monteiro, CA, Conde, WL, Popkin, BM. Is obesity replacing or adding to undernutrition? Evidence from different social classes in Brazil. Public Health Nutrition 2002; 5: 105–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Monteiro, CA, Conde, WL, Lu, B, Popkin, BM. Obesity and inequities in health in the developing world. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 2004; 28: 1181–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Monteiro, CA, Moura, EC, Conde, WL, Popkin, BM. Socioeconomic status and obesity in developing countries: a review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2004; 82: 940–6.Google ScholarPubMed
18Mendez, MA, Monteiro, CA, Popkin, BM. Overweight now exceeds underweight among women in most developing countries. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005; 81: 714–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Popkin, BM, Urbanization, lifestyle changes and the nutrition transition. World Development 1999; 27: 1905–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Du, S, Mroz, TA, Zhai, F, Popkin, BM. Rapid income growth adversely affects diet quality in China – particularly for the poor!. Social Science & Medicine 2004; 59: 1505–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Guo, X, Mroz, TA, Popkin, BM, Zhai, F. Structural changes in the impact of income on food consumption in China, 1989–93. Economic Development and Cultural Change 2000; 48: 737–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Guo, X, Popkin, BM, Mroz, TA, Zhai, F. Food price policy can favorably alter macronutrient intake in China. Journal of Nutrition 1999; 129: 994–1001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Delgado, C, Courbois, C. Trade-offs among fish, meat, and milk demand in developing countries from the 1970s to the 1990s. In: Eide, A, Vassdal, T, eds. Proceedings of the IXth Biennial Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries, Economics and Trade (IIFET 98)7–11 July 1998TromsöUniversity of Tromsö, Norwegian School of Fisheries1998.Google Scholar
24Delgado, CL. Rising consumption of meat and milk in developing countries has created a new food revolution. Journal of Nutrition 2003; 133: 3907S–10SCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Reardon, T, Timmer, CP, Barrett, CB, Berdegue, JA. The rise of supermarkets in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2003; 85: 1140–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Gordon-Larsen, P, Nelson, MC, Page, P, Popkin, BM. Inequality in the built environment underlies key health disparities in physical activity and obesity. Pediatrics 2005; in press.Google Scholar
27Popkin, BM, Zizza, C, Siega-Riz, AM. Who is leading the change? United States dietary trends 1965–96. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2003; 25: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Huang, KS, Nutrient elasticities in a complete food demand system. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1996; 78: 21–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Anderson, ES, Winett, RA, Wojcik, JR, Winett, SG, Bowden, T. A computerized social cognitive intervention for nutrition behavior: direct and mediated effects on fat, fiber, fruits, and vegetables, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations among food shoppers. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2001; 23: 88–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Reidpath, D, Burns, C, Garrard, J, Mahoney, M, Townsend, M. An ecological study of the relationship between social and environmental determinants of obesity. Health & Place 2002; 8: 141–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Morland, K, Wing, S, Diez Roux, A. The contextual effect of the local food environment on residents' diets: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. American Journal of Public Health 2002; 92: 1761–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Morland, K, Wing, S, Diez Roux, A, Poole, C. Neighborhood characteristics associated with the location of food stores and food service places. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2002; 22: 23–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Kubik, MY, Lytle, LA, Hannan, PJ, Perry, CL, Story, M. The association of the school food environment with dietary behaviors of young adolescents. American Journal of Public Health 2003; 93: 1168–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34French, SA, Stables, G. Environmental interventions to promote vegetable and fruit consumption among youth in school settings. Preventive Medicine 2003; 37: 593–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Trost, SG, Pate, RR, Dowda, M, Saunders, R, Ward, DS, Felton, G. Gender differences in physical activity and determinants of physical activity in rural fifth grade children. Journal of School Health 1996; 66: 145–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36Trost, SG, Pate, RR, Saunders, R, Ward, DS, Dowda, M, Felton, G. A prospective study of determinants of physical activity in rural fifth grade children. Preventive Medicine 1997; 26: 257–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37Sallis, JF, McKenzie, TL, Elder, JP, Broyles, SL, Nader, PR. Factors parents use in selecting play spaces for young children. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 1997; 151: 414–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Sallis, JF, Prochaska, JJ, Taylor, WC. A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2000; 32: 963–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39Dowda, M, Ainsworth, BE, Addy, CL, Saunders, R, Riner, W. Environmental influences, physical activity, and weight status in 8- to 16-year olds. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 2001; 155: 711–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40Bungum, TJ, Vincent, ML. Determinants of physical activity among female adolescents. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 1997; 13: 115–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41Sundquist, J, Malmstrom, M, Johansson, SE, Cardiovascular risk factors and the neighbourhood environment: a multilevel analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology 1999; 28: 841–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Yen, IH, Kaplan, GA, Poverty area residence and changes in physical activity level: evidence from the Alameda County Study. American Journal of Public Health 1998; 88: 1709–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Diez-Roux, AV, Merkin, SS, Hannan, P, Jacobs, D Jr, Kiefe, C. Area characteristics, individual-level socioeconomic indicators, and smoking in young adults: the Coronary Artery Disease Risk Development in Young Adults Study. American Journal of Epidemiology 2003; 157: 315–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Ewing, R, Schmid, T, Killingsworth, R, Zlot, A, Raudenbush, S. Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity. American Journal of Health Promotion 2003; 18: 47–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Houston, SL, Evenson, KR, Bors, P, Gizlice, Z. Neighborhood environment, access to places for activity, and leisure-time physical activity in a diverse North Carolina population. American Journal of Health Promotion 2003; 18: 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46Frank, LD. Land use and transportation interaction: implications on public health and quality of life. Journal of Planned Education Research 2000; 20: 6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47Frank, LD, Pivo, G. Relationships Between Land Use and Travel Behavior in the Puget Sound Region. Final report to Washington State Transportation Center and Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, WA, 1998.Google Scholar
48Ross, C, Dunning, A. Land Use Transportation Interaction: An Examination of the 1995 NPTS Data. Report No. FHWA-PL-99-003. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, 1997; 129–91.Google Scholar
49Cervero, R. Mixed land-uses and commuting: evidence from the American Housing Survey. Transportation Research 1996; A30: 361–77.Google Scholar
50Frank, LD, Pivo, G. Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: single occupant vehicle, transit, and walking. Transportation Research Record 1994; 1466: 44–52.Google Scholar
51Cervero, R, Kockelman, K, Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research 1997; D2: 199–219.Google Scholar
52Cervero, R, Radisch, C. Travel Choices in Pedestrian versus Automobile Oriented Neighborhoods. Working Paper 644. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, 1995.Google Scholar
53Frank, LD, Stone, B, Bachman, W. Linking land use with household vehicle emissions in the central Puget Sound: methodological framework and findings. Transportation Research 2000; D5: 173–96.Google Scholar