Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:26:44.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Urinary sodium-to-potassium ratio: it may be SMART, but is it easy?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2016

Lisa J Ware*
Affiliation:
Hypertension in Africa Research TeamNorth-West UniversityPrivate Bag X6001Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa
Bianca Swanepoel
Affiliation:
Centre of Excellence for NutritionNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroom, South Africa
Aletta E Schutte
Affiliation:
Hypertension in Africa Research TeamNorth-West UniversityPrivate Bag X6001Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa MRC Research Unit for Hypertension and Cardiovascular DiseaseNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroom, South Africa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Letter to the Editor
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2016 

Madam

Since the elegant studies of Dahl et al. in the early 1970s showed the effects of Na and K combined on the development and severity of salt-induced hypertension( Reference Dahl, Leitl and Heine 1 ), the importance of the molar ratio of Na to K (Na:K) in the diet for hypertension management and treatment has gained momentum. Several randomised controlled trials, large epidemiological studies (including the Intersalt study) and systematic reviews have shown that Na:K has a greater association with blood pressure outcomes in hypertensive patients than either dietary Na or K alone( 2 Reference Binia, Jaeger and Hu 19 ). Na:K may therefore present a target for dietary intervention in hypertensive patients. A recent article in Public Health Nutrition by Ge et al.( Reference Ge, Zhang and Chen 20 ) also showed the potential usefulness of Na:K beyond blood pressure, by indicating an independent association with abdominal obesity.

The WHO dietary recommendation for Na:K of 1·0( 21 ) is simple for patients and health professionals to remember. The ease with which patients can achieve this dietary ratio is relatively unknown as many populations’ average Na:K appears typically about 3·0 mmol/mmol or more( Reference Mente, O’Donnell and Rangarajan 11 , Reference Jain, Minhajuddin and Neeland 22 , Reference Donfrancesco, Ippolito and Noce 23 ). What is known, is that in the current food environment it is incredibly difficult for patients to meet the individual recommendations for both Na and K simultaneously( Reference Maillot, Monsivais and Drewnowski 24 ), the combined effect of which is often Na:K below 1·0.

Dietary goals to manage hypertension, like any goals set, need to be SMART: that is, Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Timely. The combination of advising patients to increase fruit and vegetable consumption to boost K intakes, alongside readily available literature on lower-salt diets could enable patients to work towards the recommended Na:K. Feedback and tailored advice have been identified as common elements of effective interventions for dietary behaviour change, especially in high-risk groups( Reference Adamson and Mathers 25 ), although objective measures on which to base this feedback and to assess adherence to dietary intervention are often lacking( Reference van Dam and Hunter 26 ). In a previous study, provision of 24 h urinary Na results to hypertensive patients was shown to be more effective for decreasing dietary Na intake over a one-year period than education or advice alone( Reference Nugent, Carnahan and Sheehan 27 ). In the case of Na:K, patients’ efforts to undertake dietary changes are measurable in urine spot samples( Reference Iwahori, Ueshima and Torii 28 , Reference Iwahori, Miura and Ueshima 29 ) as the target is a molar ratio and not an absolute daily amount. This avoids the challenges inherent in collecting complete 24 h urine samples. While Intersalt showed good correlation between Na:K in a spot or casual urine sample with the 24 h urine ratio( Reference Iwahori, Miura and Ueshima 29 ), smaller studies suggest that several spot urine samples may be required to achieve the level of accuracy observed with two or more 24 h urine collections( Reference Iwahori, Ueshima and Torii 28 , Reference Iwahori, Ueshima and Miyagawa 30 ). What is clear, though, is that relevant dietary advice alongside monitoring and feedback has the potential to form an efficient practice for supporting the prescription and efficacy of SMART lifestyle advice.

However, it is important to calculate this seemingly simple ratio correctly. The difference between using millimoles for the calculation (as per the WHO recommendations) and milligrams could mean the incorrect assessment of patient adherence. Even large epidemiological studies seem to have reported milligram ratios only or used the milligram and millimole values interchangeably( Reference Zhang, Cogswell and Gillespie 31 Reference Lee, Park and Kim 34 ), underlining the assumption that the two methods are equivalent; while other studies present the ratio but do not say if it is a milligram or millimole ratio( Reference Stanton, Braitman and Riley 35 Reference Kwok, Chan and Woo 37 ), leaving readers unsure how to compare data across studies. In an article addressing the feasibility of meeting dietary guidelines for both Na and K independently (at best estimated as 0·5 % of the population), Drewnowski and colleagues highlight differences in country-specific recommendations between the USA (<2300 mg Na/d and >4700 mg K/d) and other countries more closely aligned to the WHO recommendations (<2000 mg Na/d and >3510 mg K/d)( Reference Drewnowski, Rehm and Maillot 38 ). From these values it becomes apparent that the millimolar (0·83 USA; 0·96 WHO) and milligram (0·49 USA; 0·57 WHO) ratios would also then give very different recommendations both within and between countries. If we consider that the Na targets are even lower in the USA for those at higher risk (<1500 mg Na/d), the ratio becomes even more unattainable as either a molar (0·54) or milligram (0·32) target.

One example of an article that has successfully bridged the millimole/milligram divide is that of Yi et al.( Reference Yi, Curtis and Angell 39 ) published in Public Health Nutrition in 2014. This article evaluates Na:K in a population in New York City, USA clearly citing that adults are assessed against the WHO guideline for optimal Na:K (<1 mmol/mmol, which is equivalent to <0·6 mg/mg). As Yi et al. discuss, unless the units of measurement (milligram v. millimole) are clearly shown, interpreting the magnitude and relevance of a one-unit change, either in a study or in a patient, becomes difficult. It seems we need to revisit urinary Na:K and further research to support this approach is warranted.

In summary, the molar ratio of Na to K may be a SMART dietary target for hypertensive patients that can be objectively monitored to provide both a measure of adherence and as feedback to support dietary behaviour change, but the ease with which patients can achieve even the molar target value of Na:K=1·0 has yet to be shown.

Acknowledgements

Financial support: L.J.W. is supported by an agreement with the University of Wollongong (Australia) and the CDC Foundation with financial support provided by Bloomberg Philanthropies. B.S. is supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa for the duration of her PhD studies. A.E.S. is supported as South African Research Chair (SARChI) by the South African Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation, as well as the South African Medical Research Council. These sources of support had no involvement in the writing of this letter. Conflict of interest: None declared. Authorship: All authors made substantial contributions to the conception, drafting, revision and final approval of the letter. Ethics of human subject participation: Not applicable.

References

1. Dahl, LK, Leitl, G & Heine, M (1972) Influence of dietary potassium and sodium/potassium molar ratios on the development of salt hypertension. J Exp Med 136, 318330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Intersalt Collaborative Research Group (1988) Intersalt: an international study of electrolyte excretion and blood pressure. results for 24 hour urinary sodium and potassium excretion. BMJ 297, 319328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Sacks, FM, Svetkey, LP, Vollmer, WM et al. (2001) Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. N Engl J Med 344, 310.Google Scholar
4. Nowson, C & Morgan, T (1988) Change in blood pressure in relation to change in nutrients effected by manipulation of dietary sodium and potassium. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 15, 225242.Google Scholar
5. Suppa, G, Pollavini, G, Alberti, D et al. (1988) Effects of a low-sodium high-potassium salt in hypertensive patients treated with metoprolol: a multicentre study. J Hypertens 6, 787790.Google Scholar
6. Grobbee, DE, Hofman, A, Roelandt, JT et al. (1987) Sodium restriction and potassium supplementation in young people with mildly elevated blood pressure. J Hypertens 5, 115119.Google Scholar
7. Arzilli, F, Taddei, S, Graziadei, L et al. (1986) Potassium-rich and sodium-poor salt reduces blood pressure in hospitalized patients. J Hypertens Suppl 4, S347S350.Google ScholarPubMed
8. Fujita, T & Ando, K (1984) Hemodynamic and endocrine changes associated with potassium supplementation in sodium-loaded hypertensives. Hypertension 6, 184192.Google Scholar
9. Parfrey, P, Wright, P, Goodwin, F et al. (1981) Blood pressure and hormonal changes following alteration in dietary sodium and potassium in mild essential hypertension. Lancet 317, 5963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Du, S, Neiman, A, Batis, C et al. (2014) Understanding the patterns and trends of sodium intake, potassium intake, and sodium to potassium ratio and their effect on hypertension in China. Am J Clin Nutr 99, 334343.Google Scholar
11. Mente, A, O’Donnell, MJ, Rangarajan, S et al. (2014) Association of urinary sodium and potassium excretion with blood pressure. N Engl J Med 371, 601611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Huggins, CE, O’Reilly, S, Brinkman, M et al. (2011) Relationship of urinary sodium and sodium-to-potassium ratio to blood pressure in older adults in Australia. Med J Aust 195, 128132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Ruixing, Y, Jinzhen, W, Shangling, P et al. (2008) Sex differences in environmental and genetic factors for hypertension. Am J Med 121, 811819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Polónia, J, Maldonado, J, Ramos, R et al. (2006) Determinação do consumo de sal numa amostra da população portuguesa adulta pela excreção urinária de sódio. Sua relação com rigidez arterial. Rev Port Cardiol 25, 801817.Google Scholar
15. Schröder, H, Schmelz, E & Marrugat, J (2002) Relationship between diet and blood pressure in a representative Mediterranean population. Eur J Nutr 41, 161167.Google Scholar
16. Yamori, Y, Liu, L, Mu, L et al. (2002) Diet-related factors, educational levels and blood pressure in a Chinese population sample: findings from the Japan–China Cooperative Research Project. Hypertens Res 25, 559564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Hu, G & Tian, H (2001) A comparison of dietary and non-dietary factors of hypertension and normal blood pressure in a Chinese population. J Hum Hypertens 15, 487493.Google Scholar
18. Perez, V & Chang, ET (2014) Sodium-to-potassium ratio and blood pressure, hypertension, and related factors. Adv Nutr 5, 712741.Google Scholar
19. Binia, A, Jaeger, J, Hu, Y et al. (2015) Daily potassium intake and sodium-to-potassium ratio in the reduction of blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Hypertens 33, 15091520.Google Scholar
20. Ge, Z, Zhang, J, Chen, X et al. (2016) Are 24 h urinary sodium excretion and sodium: potassium independently associated with obesity in Chinese adults? Public Health Nutr 19, 10741080.Google Scholar
21. World Health Organization (2012) Guideline: Potassium Intake for Adults and Children. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
22. Jain, N, Minhajuddin, AT, Neeland, IJ et al. (2014) Association of urinary sodium-to-potassium ratio with obesity in a multiethnic cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 99, 992998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Donfrancesco, C, Ippolito, R, Noce, CL et al. (2013) Excess dietary sodium and inadequate potassium intake in Italy: results of the MINISAL study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 23, 850856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Maillot, M, Monsivais, P & Drewnowski, A (2013) Food pattern modeling shows that the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for sodium and potassium cannot be met simultaneously. Nutr Res 33, 188194.Google Scholar
25. Adamson, AJ & Mathers, JC (2004) Effecting dietary change. Proc Nutr Soc 63, 537547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. van Dam, RM & Hunter, D (2013) Biochemical indicators of dietary intake. In Nutritional Epidemiology, 3rd ed., pp. 150213 [W Willett, editor]. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
27. Nugent, CA, Carnahan, JE, Sheehan, ET et al. (1984) Salt restriction in hypertensive patients: comparison of advice, education, and group management. Arch Intern Med 144, 14151417.Google Scholar
28. Iwahori, T, Ueshima, H, Torii, S et al. (2016) Four to seven random casual urine specimens are sufficient to estimate 24-h urinary sodium/potassium ratio in individuals with high blood pressure. J Hum Hypertens 30, 328334.Google Scholar
29. Iwahori, T, Miura, K, Ueshima, H et al. (2014) Relationship between casual urinary sodium/potassium ratio and 24-h urinary sodium/potassium ratio: the Intersalt study. Circulation 129, Suppl. 1, AMP78 (abstract MP78).Google Scholar
30. Iwahori, T, Ueshima, H, Miyagawa, N et al. (2014) Six random specimens of daytime casual urine on different days are sufficient to estimate daily sodium/potassium ratio in comparison to 7-day 24-h urine collections. Hypertens Res 37, 765771.Google Scholar
31. Zhang, Z, Cogswell, ME, Gillespie, C et al. (2013) Association between usual sodium and potassium intake and blood pressure and hypertension among US adults: NHANES 2005–2010. PLoS One 8, e75289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Asakura, K, Uechi, K, Sasaki, Y et al. (2014) Estimation of sodium and potassium intakes assessed by two 24 h urine collections in healthy Japanese adults: a nationwide study. Br J Nutr 112, 11951205.Google Scholar
33. Yang, Q, Liu, T, Kuklina, EV et al. (2011) Sodium and potassium intake and mortality among us adults: prospective data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Intern Med 171, 11831191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Lee, J-S, Park, J & Kim, J (2011) Dietary factors related to hypertension risk in Korean adults – data from the Korean national health and nutrition examination survey III. Nutr Res Pract 5, 6065.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35. Stanton, JL, Braitman, LE, Riley, AM et al. (1982) Demographic, dietary, life style, and anthropometric correlates of blood pressure. Hypertension 4, III135III142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Harlan, WR, Hull, AL, Schmouder, RL et al. (1984) High blood pressure in older Americans. The First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Hypertension 6, 802809.Google Scholar
37. Kwok, T, Chan, T & Woo, J (2003) Relationship of urinary sodium/potassium excretion and calcium intake to blood pressure and prevalence of hypertension among older Chinese vegetarians. Eur J Clin Nutr 57, 299304.Google Scholar
38. Drewnowski, A, Rehm, CD, Maillot, M et al. (2015) The feasibility of meeting the WHO guidelines for sodium and potassium: a cross-national comparison study. BMJ Open 5, e006625.Google Scholar
39. Yi, SS, Curtis, CJ, Angell, SY et al. (2014) Highlighting the ratio of sodium to potassium in population-level dietary assessments: cross-sectional data from New York City, USA. Public Health Nutr 17, 24842488.Google Scholar