Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T12:43:28.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tracing ingestion of ‘novel’ foods in UK diets for possible health surveillance – a feasibility study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Claire Robertson ,
Nicky Best ,
Judith Diamond  and
Paul Elliott
Claire Robertson*
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK
Nicky Best
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK
Judith Diamond
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK
Paul Elliott
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To investigate the feasibility of using commercially available data on household food consumption to carry out food and nutritional surveillance.

Design:

Taylor Nelson Sofres (TNS) collects information on foods brought home for consumption among a representative quota sample of the British population. In total, 33 177 households and 105 667 individuals provided data between 1991 and 2000. These were used to investigate sociodemographic, geographical and temporal trends in purchase patterns of the main macronutrients and four groups of marker products.

Results:

Sociodemographic characteristics of the TNS sample were broadly consistent with those of the British population. Estimated energy intakes were slightly low (1667±715 kcal) in comparison with other national data. However, percentage energy contributions were consistent with national trends: e.g. consumption of alcohol in the home increased between 1991 and 2000 with higher intakes among more affluent households, while fat intakes decreased slightly over the same period. Significant temporal, geographic and socio-economic trends were found for all nutrients (P < 0.0001). Intakes of marker products were sparse (purchased by <4% of households), but significant variations were detected in the proportion of households purchasing some or all of the marker products across temporal, geographic and socio–economic strata.

Conclusions:

A prospective nutrient surveillance system could be used to trace consumption patterns of foods or nutrients to inform nutritional surveillance. However, existing data sources would require a number of modifications to increase their suitability for such a project. Increasing surveillance to consider ingredients would require the development of a central coding system, with electronically linked barcode, ingredient and nutrient information.

Keywords

Nutrition surveillanceDietary intake patternsHousehold food purchase dataGeographical variationsTemporal variationsSocio-economic variations
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 345 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © CAB International 2004

References

1Miettinen, TA, Puska, P, Gylling, H, Vanhanen, H, Vartiainen, E. Reduction of serum cholesterol with sitostanol–ester margarine in a mildly hypercholesterolemic population. New England Journal of Medicine 1995; 333: 1308–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Blair, SN, Capuzzi, DM, Gottleib, SO, Nguyen, T, Morgan, JM, Cater, NB. Incremental reduction of serum total cholesterol and low–density lipoprotein cholesterol with the addition of plant stanol ester-containing spread to statin therapy. American Journal of Cardiology 2000; 86: 46–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Volger, OL, Mensink, RP, Plat, J, Hornstra, G, Havekes, LM, Princen, HMG. Dietary vegetable oil and wood derived plant stanol esters reduce atherosclerotic lesion size and severity in apoE*3–Leiden transgenic mice. Atherosclerosis 2001; 157: 375–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Noakes, M, Clifton, P, Ntanios, F, Shrapnel, W, Record, I, McInerney, J. An increase in dietary carotenoids when consuming plant sterols or stanols is effective in maintaining plasma carotenoid concentrations. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2002; 75: 79–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Miettinen, TA, Vuoristo, M, Nissinen, M, Järvinen, HJ, Gylling, H. Serum, biliary, and fecal cholesterol and plant sterols in colectomized patients before and during consumption of stanol ester margarine. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 75: 79–86.Google Scholar
6Coghlan, A. Europe set for toughest GMO labelling laws. New Scientist Online News 17.05, 29 11 2002.Google Scholar
7International Conference on Post–Market Surveillance of Genetically Modified Foods, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 16–17 October 2002.Google Scholar
8Donaldson, L, May, R. Health Implications of Genetically Modified Foods. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Foods, 1999.Google Scholar
9Amanor-Boadu, V, Mowatt, D. A framework for estimating health value of post-market surveillance of potential human late health effects of genetically modified foods [abstract]. Presented at International Conference on Post-Market Surveillance of Genetically Modified Foods, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 16–17 October 2002.Google Scholar
10Dennis, B, Stamler, J, Buzzard, M, Conway, R, Elliott, P, Moag-Stahlberg, A, et al. INTERMAP: the dietary data – process and quality control. Journal of Human Hypertension 2003; 17(9): 609–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Holland, B, Welch, AA, Unwin, ID, Buss, DH, Paul, AA, Southgate, DAT. McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry and Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, 1993.Google Scholar
12Holland, B, Unwin, ID, Buss, DH. Fruit and Nuts. First Supplement to McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry and Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Gregory, J, Foster, K, Tyler, H, Wiseman, M. The Dietary and Nutritional Survey of British Adults. London: HMSO, 1990.Google Scholar
14Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Foods, National Food Survey 1991. Annual Report of the National Food Survey Committee. Household Food Consumption and Expenditure. London: HMSO, 1992.Google Scholar
15Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Foods. National Food Survey 1992. Annual Report on Household Food Consumption and Expenditure. London: HMSO, 1993.Google Scholar
16Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Foods. National Food Survey 1993. Annual Report on Household Food Consumption and Expenditure. London: HMSO, 1994.Google Scholar
17Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Foods. National Food Survey 1994. Annual Report on Household Food Consumption and Expenditure. London: HMSO, 1995.Google Scholar
18Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Foods. National Food Survey 1995. Annual Report on Household Food Expenditure, Consumption and Nutrient Intakes. London: The Stationery Office, 1996.Google Scholar
19Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Foods. National Food Survey 1996. Annual Report on Household Food Expenditure, Consumption and Nutrient Intakes. London: The Stationery Office, 1997.Google Scholar
20Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Foods. National Food Survey 1997. Annual Report on Household Food Expenditure, Consumption and Nutrient Intakes. London: The Stationery Office, 1998.Google Scholar
21Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Foods. National, Food Survey 1998. Annual Report on Household Food Expenditure, Consumption and Nutrient Intakes London: The Stationery Office, 1999.Google Scholar
22Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Foods. National Food Survey 1999. Annual Report on Household Food Expenditure, Consumption and Nutrient Intakes. London: The Stationery Office, 2000.Google Scholar
23Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. National Food Survey 2000. Annual Report on Household Food Expenditure, Consumption and Nutrient Intakes. London. The Stationery Office, 2001.Google Scholar
24Carstairs, V. Socio–economic factors at area level and their relationship with health. In: Elliott, P, Wakefield, JC, Best, NG, Briggs, DJ, eds. Spatial Epidemiology: Methods and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
25Stamler, J, Elliott, P, Chan, Q. INTERMAP Appendix tables. Journal of Human Hypertension 2003; 17(9): 665–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Stamler, J, Elliott, P, Dennis, B, Dyer, AR, Kesteloot, H, Liu, K. INTERMAP: background, aims, design, methods, and descriptive statistics (non–dietary). Journal of Human Hypertension 2003; 17(9): 591–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Bingham, SA, Cummings, JH. Urinary nitrogen as an independent validatory measure of dietary intake: a study of nitrogen balance in individuals consuming their normal diet. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1985; 42: 1276–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Bingham, SA. The dietary assessment of individuals; methods, accuracy, new techniques and recommendations. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 1987; 57(Suppl. 10): 705–41.Google Scholar
29Schakel, SF. Maintaining a nutrient database in a changing marketplace: keeping pace with changing food products – a research perspective. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 2001; 14: 315–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar