Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:05:33.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of foreign direct investment in the nutrition transition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Corinna Hawkes
Corinna Hawkes*
Affiliation:
International Food Policy Research Institute, 2033 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective

To examine the role of foreign direct investment (FDI) in the nutrition transition, focusing on highly processed foods.

Design

Data on FDI were identified from reports/databases and then compiled and analysed. A review of published literature on FDI into the food sector was conducted.

Setting

The nutrition transition is a public health concern owing to its connection with the rising burden of obesity and diet-related chronic diseases in developing countries. Global health leaders are calling for action to address the threat. Highly processed foods often have considerable fat, sugar and salt content, and warrant closer examination.

Results

FDI into food processing, service and retail has risen rapidly since the 1980s, mainly from transnational food companies (TFCs) in developed countries. As FDI has risen, so has the proportion invested in highly processed foods for sale in the host market. FDI has proved more effective than trade in generating sales of highly processed foods, and enables TFCs to cut costs, gain market power and obtain efficiencies in distribution and marketing. The amount of FDI targeted at developing countries is increasing; while a disproportionate share enters the larger developing economies, foreign affiliates of TFCs are among the largest companies in low- and low- to middle-income countries. The effect of FDI is to make more highly processed foods available to more people. FDI has made it possible to lower prices, open up new purchasing channels, optimise the effectiveness of marketing and advertising, and increase sales.

Conclusion

FDI has been a key mechanism in shaping the global market for highly processed foods. Notwithstanding the role of demand-side factors, it has played a role in the nutrition transition by enabling and promoting the consumption of these foods in developing countries. Empirical data on consumption patterns of highly processed foods in developing countries are critically needed, but since FDI is a long-term investment vehicle, it is reasonable to assume that availability and consumption of highly processed foods will continue to increase. FDI can, however, bring considerable benefits as well as risks. Through its position ‘upstream’, FDI would therefore be an appropriate entry-point to implement a range of public health policies to ‘redirect’ the nutrition transition.

Keywords

Nutrition transitionForeign direct investmentGlobalisationTransnational food companiesHighly processed foodsFast foodFood processingFood priceSupermarketsFood policyPublic health policy
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , June 2005 , pp. 357 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2005

References

1Popkin, BM. The nutrition transition and its health implications in lower income countries. Public Health (Nutrition) 1998; 1: 5–21.Google ScholarPubMed
2Popkin, BM. An overview of the nutrition transition and its health implications: The Bellagio Meeting. Public Health Nutrition 2002; 5(1A): 93–103.Google Scholar
3World Health Organization. Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health, 05 2004. Available at http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/strategy/eb11344/en/Google Scholar
4Haddad, L. Redirecting the nutrition transition: what can food policy do?. Development Policy Review 2003; 21: 599–614.Google Scholar
5Ruel, MT, Haddad, L, Garrett, JL. Some urban facts of life: implications for research and policy. World Development 1999; 27: 1917–38.Google Scholar
6Hawkes, C. Marketing activities of global soft drink and fast food companies in emerging markets: a review. In: Globalization, Diets and Noncommunicable Diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002. Available at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/9241590416.pdfGoogle Scholar
7Chopra, M, Darnton-Hill, I. Tobacco and obesity epidemics: not so different after all?. British Medical Journal 2004; 328: 1558–60.Google Scholar
8United Nations Standing Committee on Nutrition (UN SCN). 5th Report on the World Nutrition Situation: Nutrition for Improved Development Outcomes. Geneva: UN SCN, 2004.Google Scholar
9Gilmore, AB, McKee, M. Tobacco and transition: an overview of industry investments, impact and influence in the former Soviet Union. Tobacco Control 2004; 13: 136–42.Google Scholar
10Bolling, C, Somwaru, A. US food companies access foreign markets through direct investment. Food Review 2001; 24: 23–8.Google Scholar
11Mody, A. Is FDI integrating the world economy?. The World Economy 2004; 27: 1195–222.Google Scholar
12United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). World Investment Report 2003. FDI Policies for Development: National and International Perspectives. Geneva: UNCTAD, 2003.Google Scholar
13Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Foreign Direct Investment, Development and Corporate Responsibility. Paris: OECD, 2000.Google Scholar
14United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). Largest Transnational Corporations, 2004. Available at http://www.unctad.org/Templates/Page.asp?intItemID=2443&lang=1Google Scholar
15United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America & the Caribbean (UN ECLAC). Foreign Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean. Chile: UN ECLAC, 2003.Google Scholar
16United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). World Investment Directory, 2004. Available at http://www.unctad.org/Templates/Page.asp?intItemID=3204&lang=1Google Scholar
17Mattson, J, Koo, WW. US Processed Food Exports and Foreign Direct Investment in the Western Hemisphere. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University, 2002.Google Scholar
18Tullao, TS. The impact of economic globalization on NCDs: opportunities and threats. In: Globalization, Diets and Noncommunicable Diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002; Available at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/9241590416.pdfGoogle Scholar
19Whitton, C. Processed Agricultural Exports Led Gains in US Agricultural Exports Between 1976 and 2002. Electronic Output Report FAU-85-01. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 2004.Google Scholar
20Bolling, C, Neff, S, Handy, C. US Foreign Direct Investment in the Western Hemisphere Processed Food Industry. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, 1998.Google Scholar
21Bolling, C. Appendix 4: Foreign direct investment in the global processed food industries. In: Burfisher, ME, Jones, EA, eds. Regional Trade Agreements and US Agriculture Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, 1998.Google Scholar
22Gow, HR, Swinnen, JFM. Impact of foreign direct investment on agriculture and agro-industry in transition economies. In: Csaki, C, Lerman, Z, eds. Structural Change in the Farming Sectors in Central and Eastern Europe. World Bank Technical Paper No. 465. Washington DC: World Bank, 2000.Google Scholar
23Jansik, C. Foreign Direct Investment in the Food Processing of the Baltic Countries. Economic Research Report 250. Helsinki: Taloustukimus (MTTL), 2001.Google Scholar
24Walkenhorst, P. The geography of foreign direct investment in Poland's food industry. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2001; 52: 71–86.Google Scholar
25Wei, A, Cacho, J. Competition among foreign and Chinese agro-food enterprises in the process of globalization. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 2001; 2: 437–51.Google Scholar
26Yenal, NZ. Food TNCs, intellectual property investments and Post-Fordist food consumption: the case of Unilever and Nestlé in Turkey. International Journal of the Sociology of Agriculture and Food 1999; 8: 21–34.Google Scholar
27Bolling, C, Elizalde, JC, Handy, C. US firms invest in Mexico's processed food industry. Food Review 1999; 22: 26–30.Google Scholar
28Reardon, T, Timmer, CP, Barrett, CB, Berdegué, J. The rise of supermarkets in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2003; 85: 1140–6.Google Scholar
29Reardon, T, Swinnen, JFM. Agrifood sector liberalisation and the rise of supermarkets in former state-controlled economies: a comparative overview. Development Policy Review 2004; 22: 515–23.Google Scholar
30Reardon, TBerdegué, JA. The rapid rise of supermarkets in Latin America: challenges and opportunities for development. Development Policy Review 2002; 20: 371–88.Google Scholar
31Dries, L, Reardon, T, Swinnen, JFM. The rapid rise of supermarkets in Central and Eastern Europe: implications for the agrifood sector and rural development. Development Policy Review 2004; 22: 525–56.Google Scholar
32Harris, JM, Kaufman, PR, Martinez, SW, Price, C. The US Food Marketing System, 2002. Agricultural Economic Report No. 811. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, 2002.Google Scholar
33US International Trade Commission. Processed Foods and Beverages: A Description of Tariff and Non-Tariff Barriers for Major Products and their Impact on Trade: Vol. 1. Washington, DC: US Trade Commission, 2001.Google Scholar
34Pritchard, B, Fagan, R. Circuits of capital and transnational corporate spatial behaviour: Nestlé in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture 1999; 8: 3–20.Google Scholar
35Chavez, M. The transformation of Mexican retailing with NAFTA. Development Policy Review 2002; 20: 503–13.Google Scholar
36Bolling, C. Globalization of the soft drink industry. Agricultural Outlook 2002; 297: 25–7.Google Scholar
37Jansik, C. The path of Baltic food industries towards the EU. Economic Trends (Finland) 2003; 2: 30–3.Google Scholar
38Gehlhar, M. Shaping the global market for high-value foods. Agricultural Outlook 2002; 297: 38–42.Google Scholar
39Plummer, C, Makki, S. French fries driving globalization of frozen potato industry. Agricultural Outlook 2002; 295: 8–11.Google Scholar
40Lanclos, DK, Devadoss, S, Guenthner, J. Impacts of foreign direct investment and advertising on the export demand for US frozen potatoes. Agribusiness 1997; 13: 273–84.Google Scholar
41Farina, EMMQ. Challenges for Brazil's food industry in the context of globalization and Mercosur consolidation. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 2001; 2: 315–30.Google Scholar
42Ghezán, D, Mateos, M, Viteri, L. Impact of supermarkets and fast-food chains on horticulture supply chains in Argentina. Development Policy Review 2002; 20: 389–408.Google Scholar
43Watson, JL, ed. Golden Arches East: McDonald's in East Asia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
44Drewnowski, A, Popkin, BM. The nutrition transition: new trends in the global diet. Nutrition Reviews 1997; 55: 31–43.Google Scholar
45Popkin, BM, Nielsen, SJ. The sweetening of the world's diet. Obesity Research 2003; 11: 1325–32.Google Scholar
46Bettcher, D, Subramaniam, C, Guidon, E, Perucic, A-M, Soll, L, Grabman, G. Confronting the Tobacco Epidemic in an Era of Trade Liberalization. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003.Google Scholar
47Caraher, M, Coveney, J. Public health nutrition and food policy. Public Health Nutrition 2004; 7: 591–8.Google Scholar
48Hawkes, C. The Global Regulatory Environment around Marketing Food to Children. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.Google Scholar
49Hawkes, C. The Global Regulatory Environment around Nutrition Labels and Health Claims. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.Google Scholar
50Hooker, NH, Caswell, JA. Trends in food quality regulation: implications for processed food trade and foreign direct investment. Agribusiness 1996; 12: 411–9.Google Scholar
51BBC News. Coca-Cola makes Somalia return. Available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3865595.stmGoogle Scholar
52Lang, T, Heasman, M. Diet and nutrition policy: a clash of ideas or investment? Development 2004; 47: 64–74.Google Scholar
53United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). World Investment Report 1999. Foreign Direct Investment and the Challenge of Developments. Geneva: UNCTAD, 2003.Google Scholar
54South Centre. Foreign Direct Investment, Development and the New Global Economic Order. Geneva: South Centre, 2000.Google Scholar
55Doane, D, Greenhill, R, Oram, J, Pettifor, A, Simms, A. Chasing Shadows: Re-imagining Finance for Development. London: New Economics Foundations, 2002.Google Scholar
56Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Policies to Enhance Sustainable Development. Paris: OECD, 2001.Google Scholar