Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T19:03:05.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rapid assessment of maternal activity among rural Indian mothers (Pune Maternal Nutrition Study)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

AN Kanade ,
S Rao ,
CS Yajnik ,
BM Margetts  and
CHD Fall
AN Kanade
Affiliation:
Biometry & Nutrition Group, Agharkar Research Institute, GG Agarkar Road, Pune 411 004, India
S Rao*
Affiliation:
Biometry & Nutrition Group, Agharkar Research Institute, GG Agarkar Road, Pune 411 004, India
CS Yajnik
Affiliation:
Diabetes Unit, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India
BM Margetts
Affiliation:
Institute of Human Nutrition, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
CHD Fall
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Environmental Epidemiology Unit, Southampton, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective

To develop an activity questionnaire for objective and rapid assessment of maternal habitual physical activity with the aim of describing its relationship with birth size.

Design

Prospective observational study.

Setting

Six villages near Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Subjects

Seven hundred and ninety-seven rural Indian mothers were studied after excluding abortions and termination of pregnancies, foetal anomalies, etc.

Method

Principal components analysis (PCA) was used to identify a few leading questions from an elaborate questionnaire involving 36 questions related to 14 typical maternal activities.

Results

On the basis of high loading (>0.8), PCA identified three activities, i.e. farming, fetching water and washing clothes. Questions and sub-questions related to these activities only were considered for defining an activity score for rapid assessment. Validation of this new activity score, with the score based on the elaborate questionnaire, showed 70% sensitivity as well as specificity. New activity scores showed strong inverse relationships similar to those observed using the elaborate questionnaire, at early as well as late gestation, with neonatal head circumference (P=0.001 and 0.055) and mid-arm circumference (P=0.02 and 0.03).

Conclusions

Simple questionnaires, based on leading activities identified by PCA, can be as informative as longer and detailed questionnaires. This method has potential for adaptation, especially in rural communities in developing countries.

Keywords

IndiaMaternal activityBirth sizeActivity questionnaire
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 8 , Issue 6 , September 2005 , pp. 588 - 595
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2005

References

1Gopalan, C. Low birth-weight: significance and implications. In: Sachdev, HPS, Chaudhary, P, eds. Nutrition in Children; Developing Country Concerns. New Delhi: Imprint, 1994.Google Scholar
2Washburn, RA, Goldfield, SR, Smith, KW, McKinlay, JB. The validity of self-reported exercise induced sweating as a measure of physical activity. American Journal of Epidemiology 1990; 132: 107–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Warwick, PM, Macqueen, SE. Retrospective assessment of level of activity and energy expenditure – a pilot study. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 1988; 13:149.Google Scholar
4Schoeller, DA, Racette, SB. A review of field techniques for the assessment of energy expenditure. Journal of Nutrition 1990; 120(Suppl.): 1492–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Bernstein, M, Sloutskis, D, Kumanyika, S, Sparti, A, Schutz, Y, Morabia, A. A data-based approach for developing a physical activity frequency questionnaire. American Journal of Epidemiology 1998; 147: 147–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Kannel, WB, Sorlie, P. Some health benefits of physical activity. The Framingham study. Archives of Internal Medicine 1979; 139: 857–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Reiff, GG, Montoye, HJ, Remington, RD, Napier, JA, Metzner, HL, Epstein, FH. Assessment of physical activity by questionnaire and interview. In: Karvonan, MJ, Barry, AJ, eds. Physical Activity and The Heart. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1967; 336–72.Google Scholar
8Taylor, HL, Jacobs, DR Jr, Schucker, B, Knudsen, J, Leon, AS, Debacker, G. 1978; Assessment of leisure time physical activities. Journal of Chronic Diseases 1978; 31: 744–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Phillippaerts, RM, Lefevre, J. Reliability and validity of three physical activity questionnaires in Flemish males. American Journal of Epidemiology 1998; 147: 980–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Paffenbarger, RS Jr, Blair, SN, Lee, IM, Hyde, RT. Measurement of physical activity to assess health effects in free living populations. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 1993; 25: 50–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Aaron, DJ, Kriska, AM, Dearwater, SR, Cauley, JA, Metz, KF, LaPorte, RE. Reproducibility and validity of an epidemiologic questionnaire to assess past year physical activity in adolescents. American Journal of Epidemiology 1995; 142: 191–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Rao, S, Kanade, A, Margetts, BM, Yajnik, CS, Lubree, H, Rege, S et al. Maternal activity in relation to birth size in rural India: the Pune Maternal Nutrition Study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2003; 57: 531–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Gopalan, C. Growth of Affluent Indian Girls during Adolescence. Scientific Report No. 10. New Delhi: Nutrition Foundation of India, 1989.Google Scholar
14World Health Organization (WHO). Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. Geneva: WHO, 1985.Google Scholar
15Rao, S, Yajnik, CS, Kanade, AN, Fall, CH, Margetts, BM, Jackson, AA, et al. Intake of micronutrient-rich foods in rural Indian mothers is associated with the size of their babies at birth: Pune Maternal Nutrition Study. Journal of Nutrition 2001; 131: 1217–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Lawrence, M, Singh, J, Lawrence, F, Whitehead, RG. The energy cost of common daily activities in African women: increased expenditure in pregnancy? American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1985; 42: 753–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Baecke, JAH, Burema, J, Frijters, JER. A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1982; 36: 936–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Pols, MA, Peeters, PH, Kemper, HC, Collette, HJ. Repeatability and relative validity of two physical activity questionnaires in elderly women. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 1996; 28: 1020–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Heini, A, Schutz, Y, Diaz, E, Prentice, AM, Whitehead, RG, Jequier, E. Free-living energy expenditure measured by two independent techniques in pregnant and nonpregnant Gambian women. American Journal of Physiology 1991; 261: E9–17.Google ScholarPubMed
20Siconolfi, SF, Lasater, TM, Snow, RC, Carleton, RA. Self-reported physical activity compared with maximal oxygen uptake. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1985; 122: 101–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Kohl, HW, Blair, SN, Paffenbarger, RS Jr, Macera, CA, Kronenfeld, JJ. A mail survey of physical activity habits as related to measured physical fitness. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1988; 127: 1228–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed