Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:36:42.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public health implications of meat production and consumption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Polly Walker ,
Pamela Rhubart-Berg ,
Shawn McKenzie ,
Kristin Kelling  and
Robert S Lawrence
Polly Walker
Affiliation:
Center for a Livable Future, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, W1033, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Pamela Rhubart-Berg
Affiliation:
Center for a Livable Future, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, W1033, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Shawn McKenzie
Affiliation:
Center for a Livable Future, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, W1033, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Kristin Kelling
Affiliation:
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Robert S Lawrence*
Affiliation:
Center for a Livable Future, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, W1033, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The high level of meat and saturated fat consumption in the USA and other high-income countries exceeds nutritional needs and contributes to high rates of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus and some cancers. Affluent citizens in middle- and low-income countries are adopting similar high-meat diets and experiencing increased rates of these same chronic diseases. The industrial agricultural system, now the predominant form of agriculture in the USA and increasingly world-wide, has consequences for public health owing to its extensive use of fertilisers and pesticides, unsustainable use of resources and environmental pollution. In industrial animal production there are public health concerns surrounding feed formulations that include animal tissues, arsenic and antibiotics as well as occupational health risks and risks for nearby communities. It is of paramount importance for public health professionals to become aware of and involved in how our food is produced.

Keywords

DietEnvironmentHealthNutritionIndustrial agricultureIndustrial animal productionSustainabilitySustainable agricultureAquacultureMeat
Type
Invited Paper
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , June 2005 , pp. 348 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2005

References

1Kendall, HW, Arrow, KJ, Borlaug, NE, Ehrlich, PR, Lederberg, J, Vargas, JI, et al. Meeting the Challenges of Population, Environment, and Resources: The Cost of Inaction, Washington, DC: World Bank, 1996.Google Scholar
2Smil, V. Food production. In: Caballero, B, Popkin, BM, eds. The Nutrition Transition: Diet and Disease in the Developing World, New York, NY: 1st ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2002; 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Myers, N, Kent, J. New consumers: the influence of affluence on the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 2003; 100(8): 4963–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4United Nations (UN). World Population to 2300. ST/ESA/ SER.A/236. New York, NY: UN, 2004.Google Scholar
5Pimentel, D, Wilson, A. World population, agriculture and malnutrition. WorldWatch 2004; (09/10): 22–5.Google Scholar
6Mann, JI. Diet and risk of coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2002; 360(9335): 783–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Key, TJ, Schatzkin, A, Willett, WC, Allen, NE, Spencer, EA, Travis, RC. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of cancer. Public Health Nutrition. 2004; 7(1A): 187–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Hu, FB, Willett, WC. Optimal diets for prevention of coronary heart disease. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002; 288(20): 2569–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Chao, A, Thun, MJ, Connell, CJ, McCullough, ML, Jacobs, EJ, Flanders, WD, et al. . Meat consumption and risk of colorectal cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2005; 293(2): 172–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Van Horn, L. Fiber, lipids, and coronary heart disease. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Nutrition Committee, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1997; 95(12): 2701–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11van Dam, RM, Rimm, EB, Willett, WC, Stampfer, MJ, Hu, FB. Dietary patterns and risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus in US men. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2002; 136(3): 201–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Fung, TT, Schulze, M, Manson, JE, Willett, WC, Hu, FB. Dietary patterns, meat intake, and the risk of type 2 diabetes in women. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2004; 164(20): 2235–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Speedy, AW. Global production and consumption of animal source foods. Journal of Nutrition. 2003; 133(Suppl.): 4048S–53S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14McMichael, A. Planetary Overload: Global Environmental Change and the Health of the Human Species. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
15Frazao, E. High costs of poor eating patterns in the United States. In: Frazao, E, ed. America's Eating Habits: Changes and Consequences. Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 750. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, 1999; 5–32.Google Scholar
16Schroder, H, Marrugat, J, Vila, J, Covas, MI, Elosua, R. Adherence to the traditional Mediterranean diet is inversely associated with body mass index and obesity in a Spanish population. Journal of Nutrition. 2004; 134(12): 3355–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Produce for Better Health Foundation. State of the Plate Research Report 2002. Wilmington, DE: Produce for Better Health Foundation, 2002.Google Scholar
18Liu, S, Willett, WC, Manson, JE, Hu, FB, Rosner, B, Colditz, G. Relation between changes in intakes of dietary fiber and grain products and changes in weight and development of obesity among middle-aged women. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2003; 78(5): 920–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Panagiotakos, DB, Pitsavos, C, Chrysohoou, C, Stefanadis, C, Toutouzas, P. Primary prevention of acute coronary events through the adoption of a Mediterranean-style diet. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2002; 8(4–5): 593–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Davis, MS, Miller, CK, Mitchell, DC. More favorable dietary patterns are associated with lower glycemic load in older adults. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2004; 104(12): 1828–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Hu, FB, Willett, WC. Optimal diets for prevention of coronary heart disease. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002; 288(20): 2569–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Bender, A. Meat and Meat Products in Human Nutrition in the Developing World. Food and Nutrition paper No. 53. Rome: Food and Agriculture organization of the United Nations, 1992; 53.Google Scholar
23National Research Council. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrates, Fiber, Fat, Protein, and Amino Acids (Macronutrients). Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003.Google Scholar
24Popkin, BM, Du, S. Dynamics of the nutrition transition toward the animal foods sector in China and its implications: a worried perspective. Journal of Nutrition 2003; 133(Suppl. 2): 3898S–906S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25American Dietetic Association. Vegetarian diets – position of the American Dietetic Association. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 1997; 97: 1317–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Singh, PN, Sabate, J, Fraser, GE. Does low meat consumption increase life expectancy in humans? American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2003; 78(Suppl. 3): 526S–32S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Kelemen, LE, Kushi, LH, Jacobs, DR Jr, Cerhan, JR. Associations of dietary protein with disease and mortality in a prospective study of postmenopausal women. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2005; 161(3): 239–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28US Department of Agriculture. USDA Agricultural Baseline Projections to 2014 [online], 2005. Baseline Report OCE-2005-1, 116 pp. Available at http://www.usda.gov/oce/waob/commodity-projections/proj.htm. Accessed 17 March 2005.Google Scholar
29Beef Promotion and Research Board. Beef demand climbs nearly eight percent in 2004 [online], 2005. Available at www.beefboard.org. Accessed 16 February 2005.Google Scholar
30Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture. Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook [online], 11 and 12 2004. Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/1dp/. Accessed 27 April 2005.Google Scholar
31American Heart Association. An Eating Plan for Healthy Americans [online], 2005. Available at http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=1088. Accessed 5 January 2005.Google Scholar
32United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. FAOSTAT Database [online], 2004. Available at http://www.faostat.fao.org/faostat/collections?subset=agriculture. Accessed 8 January 2004.Google Scholar
33Horrigan, L, Lawrence, RS, Walker, P. How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2002; 110(5): 445–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Caballero, B, Popkin, BM. The Nutrition Transition: Diet and Disease in the Developing World. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2002.Google Scholar
35World Health Organization (WHO). Diet, Nutrition, and the Prevention of Chronic Disease. WHO Technical Report Series No. 913. Geneva: WHO, 2003.Google Scholar
36Kitalyi, AJ. Village Chicken Production Systems in Rural Africa: Household Food Security and Gender Issues. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, 1998.Google Scholar
37Pimentel, D, Berger, B, Filiberto, D, Newton, M, Wolfe, B, Karabinakis, E, et al. Water resources: agricultural and environmental issues. BioScience. 2004; 54(10): 909–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Aron, JL, Patz, J. Ecosystem Change and Public Health: A Global Perspective. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
39Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI) and International Water Management Institute. Water – More Nutrition per Drop. Towards Sustainable Food Production and Consumption Patterns in a Rapidly Changing World. Stockholm: SIWI, 2004.Google Scholar
40Cook, M. Reducing water pollution from animal feeding operations. Testimony before Subcommittee on Forestry, Resource Conservation, and Research of the Committee on Agriculture, US House of Representatives, 13 05 1998. Available at http://www.epa.gov/ocirpage/hearings/testimony/105_1997_1998/051398.htm. Accessed 17 March 2005.Google Scholar
41Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine. Dioxins and Dioxin-like Compounds in the Food Supply: Strategies to Decrease Exposure. Washington, DC: Nationaly Academies Press 2003.Google Scholar
42Brown, LR. Who Will Feed China? Wake-up Call for a Small Planet, 1st ed. New York: WW Norton, 1995.Google Scholar
43Brown, LR. Running on empty. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy. 2001; 16(1): 6–8.Google Scholar
44Black, KD. Environmental Impacts of Aquaculture. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 2001.Google Scholar
45Gewin, V. Troubled waters: the future of global fisheries. PLoS Biology 2004; 2(4): E113 Available at http://biology. plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=index-html&issn=1545–7885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46Clarkson, TW, Strain, JJ. Nutritional factors may modify the toxic action of methyl mercury in fish-eating populations. Journal of Nutrition 2003; 133(Suppl. 1): 1539S–43S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47Stokstad, E. Salmon survey stokes debate about farmed fish. Science. 2004; 303(5655): 154–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48US Environmental Protection Agency. Regulatory Definitions of Large CAFOs, Medium CAFOs, and Small CAFOs [online], 2004. Available at http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/sector_table.pdf. Accessed 8 January 2005.Google Scholar
49Osterberg, D, Wallinga, D. Addressing externalities from swine production to reduce public health and environmental impacts. American Journal of Public Health. 2004; 94(10): 1703–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50American Public Health Association. Resolution 2003–7, Precautionary Moratorium on New Concentrated Animal Feed Operations [online], 2004. Available at http://www.apha.org/legislative/policy/policysearch/index.cfm?fuseaction=view&id=1243. Accessed 25 October 2004.Google Scholar
51Fleming, R, Ford, M. Humans versus Animals – Comparison of Waste Properties [online], 2004. Available at http://www.gov.on.ca/OMAFRA/english/crops/field/news/croptalk/2001/ct_1101a9.htm. Accessed 14 December 2004.Google Scholar
52Wing, S, Wolf, S. Intensive livestock operations, health, and quality of life among eastern North Carolina residents. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2000; 108(3): 233–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53Hamscher, G, Pawelzick, HT, Sczesny, S, Nau, H, Hartung, J. Antibiotics in dust originating from a pig-fattening farm: a new source of health hazard for farmers? Environmental Health Perspectives. 2003; 111(13): 1590–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54Wing, S, Freedman, S, Band, L. The potential impact of flooding on confined animal feeding operations in eastern North Carolina. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2002; 110(4): 387–91.Google Scholar
55Arai, Y, Lanzirotti, A, Sutton, S, Davis, JA, Sparks, DL. Arsenic speciation and reactivity in poultry litter. Environmental Science & Technology. 2003; 37(18): 4083–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56Lasky, T, Sun, W, Kadry, A, Hoffman, MK. Mean total arsenic concentrations in chicken 1989–2000 and estimated exposures for consumers of chicken. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2004; 112(1): 18–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57Silbergeld, EK. Arsenic in food. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2004; 112(6): A338–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58Flora, JL, Hodne, CJ, Goudy, W, Osterberg, D, Kliebenstein, J, Thu, KM, et al. Social and community impacts. In: Iowa State University and University of Iowa Study Group, ed. Iowa Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations Air Quality Study. Iowa City Ames, IA: Iowa State University The University of Iowa Study Group, 2002; 147–63.Google Scholar
59Mellon, M, Benbrook, C, Benbrook, KL. Hogging It: Estimates of Antimicrobial Abuse in Livestock, 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists, 2001.Google Scholar
60Chee-Sanford, JC, Aminov, RI, Krapac, IJ, Garrigues-Jeanjean, N, Mackie, RI. Occurrence and diversity of tetracycline resistance genes in lagoons and groundwater underlying two swine production facilities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2001; 67(4): 1494–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61World Health Organization (WHO). Antibiotic use in food-producing animals must be curtailed to prevent increased resistance in humans. Press Release WHO/73. Geneva: WHO, 1997.Google Scholar
62American Public Health Association. Resolution 2004–13, Helping Preserve Antibiotic Effectiveness by Stimulating Demand for Meats Produced Without Excessive Antibiotics [online], 2004. Available at http://www.apha.org/legislative/policy/policysearch/index.cfm?fuseaction=view&id=1299. Accessed 6 January 2005.Google Scholar
63American Academy of Microbiology. Antimicrobial Resistance: An Ecological Perspective. Washington, DC: American Academy of Microbiology, 1999; 1–14.Google Scholar
64Schiffman, SS, Bennett, JL, Raymer, JH. Quantification of odors and odorants from swine operations in North Carolina. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2001; 108: 213–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65Chapin, A, Rule, A, Gibson, K, Buckley, T, Schwab, K. Airborne multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from a concentrated swine feeding operation. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2005; 113(2): 137–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66Cole, D, Todd, L, Wing, S. Concentrated swine feeding operations and public health: a review of occupational and community health effects. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2000; 108(8): 685–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
67Merchant, JA, Naleway, AL, Svendsen, ER, Kelly, KM, Burmeister, LF, Stromquist, AM, et al. . Asthma and farm exposures in a cohort of rural Iowa children. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2005; 113(3): 350–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
68Striffler, S. Inside a poultry processing plant: an ethnographic portrait. Labor History. 2002; 43(3): 305–13.Google Scholar
69Green, JJ, Barham, E. Globalization and Latino Labor: Labor Advocates' Accounts of Meatpacking in Rural Missouri. Latinos in Missouri Occasional Paper series, No. 1. Columbia, Mo: University of Missouri, Department of Rural Sociology, 2002; 1–14.Google Scholar
70Stull, DD, Broadway, MJ. Slaughterhouse Blues: The Meat and Poultry Industry in North America. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth, 2004.Google Scholar
71Thu, K, Donham, K, Ziegenhorn, R, Reynolds, S, Thorne, P, Subramanian, P, et al. A control study of the physical and mental health of residents living near a large-scale swine operation. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health. 1997; 3(1): 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
72Branfman, F. Living in shimmering disequilibrium [online], 2000. Available at http://dir.salon.com/people/feature/2000/04/22/eowilson/index.html. Accessed 17 March 2005.Google Scholar
73Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome Declaration on Food Security. World Food Summit, 13–16 November 1996. Rome: FAO, 1997.Google Scholar
74US Department of Health and Human Services, US Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005 [online], 2005. Available at http://www.healthierus.gov/dietaryguidelines/. Accessed 12 February 2005.Google Scholar
75Berry, W. Sex, Economy, Freedom & Community: Eight Essays, 1st ed. New York: Pantheon Books, 1993.Google Scholar