Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T09:33:39.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Poverty and household food security of black South African farm workers: the legacy of social inequalities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

A Kruger ,
S Lemke ,
Mars Phometsi ,
H van't Riet ,
AE Pienaar  and
G Kotze
A Kruger*
Affiliation:
Nutrition Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, Box 594, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa
S Lemke
Affiliation:
Centre for International Development and Environmental Research, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Germany and Visiting Research Fellow, Nutrition Department, North-West University, South Africa
Mars Phometsi
Affiliation:
Nutrition Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, Box 594, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa
H van't Riet
Affiliation:
GG&GD (Gemeentelyke Geneeskundige en Gezondheidsdienst), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and former Visiting Research Fellow, Nutrition Department, North-West University, South Africa
AE Pienaar
Affiliation:
School for Biokinetics, Recreation and Sports Science, North-West University, South Africa
G Kotze
Affiliation:
Department of Social Work, School of Behavioural and Psychosocial Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, South Africa
*
*corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective

To assess socio-economic indicators, nutritional status and living conditions of farm workers and their families, with the purpose to develop research and intervention programmes aimed at enhancing nutritional status and quality of life.

Design and setting

Three farm schools in two districts of the North-West Province and farming communities were selected. Anthropometrical measurements, structured face-to-face questionnaires and focus group discussions were carried out in 2002 and 2003 by a multidisciplinary research team.

Results

Access to electricity, water and sanitation, as well as monthly food rations or subsidies, vary and depend on farm owners. The majority of adults have education below or up to grade four, farm schools provide only up to grade seven. Distance to farm schools and intra-household issues hamper children's attendance and performance at school. Household food security is compromised due to a lack of financial resources, infrastructure and also household resource allocation. This impacts negatively especially on children, with half of them being underweight, stunted or wasted. Employment is usually linked to men, while most women have access to casual jobs only. Insecurity of residence and the perceived disempowered position towards farm owners add to feelings of hopelessness and stress.

Conclusions and recommendations

This study highlights destitute living conditions of farm worker families. Apart from structural and financial constraints, paternalistic structures of the past might also hamper development. Based on these findings, follow-up research projects and in-depth investigations into underlying social issues with regard to nutrition insecurity and livelihoods of farm workers were initiated.

Keywords

PovertySocio-economic factorsHousehold food securityFarm workersFLAGH programme
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 9 , Issue 7 , October 2006 , pp. 830 - 836
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2006

References

1Vorster, HH, Wissing, MP, Venter, CS, Kruger, HS, Kruger, A, Malan, NT, et al. The impact of urbanization on physical, physiological and mental health of Africans in the North West Province of South Africa: The THUSA Study. South African Journal of Science 2000; 96: 505–14.Google Scholar
2United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). Children and Women in South Africa: A Situation Analysis. Johannesburg: UNICEF, 1993.Google Scholar
3Labadarios, D, ed. The National Food Consumption Survey (NFCS): Children Aged 1–9 years, South Africa, 1999. Technical Report. Pretoria: Department of Health, 2000; 1206.Google Scholar
4Schenker, M. The health of farm workers – so much different, so much the same. South African Medical Journal 1998; 88(9): 1091–2.Google ScholarPubMed
5London, L, Nell, V, Thompson, M-L, Myers, JE. Health status among farm workers in the Western Cape – collateral evidence from a study of occupational hazards. South African Medical Journal 1998; 88(9): 1096–101.Google ScholarPubMed
6Prinsloo, A, Pienaar, AE. Prevalence of developmental co-ordination disorder and influences of physical activity levels and body composition on the children of farm workers: FLAGH-study. African Journal for Physical, Health Education, Recreation and Dance 2003; 9(1): 151–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Ellis, F. Diverse Livelihoods and Natural Resources: A Research Context. Sustainable Livelihoods in Southern Africa: Institutions, Governance and Policy Processes. Sustainable Livelihoods in Southern Africa (SLSA) Working Paper 7. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies, 2001. Also available at http://www.ids.ac.uk/ids/KNOTS/PDFs/SLSA7.pdf. Accessed June 2003.Google Scholar
8 South African Department of Agriculture. The History of Agriculture in South Africa [online], 2003. Available at http://www.nda.agric.za/publications. Accessed June 2003.Google Scholar
9Van Onselen, C. The Seed is Mine. The Life of Kas Maine, a South African Sharecropper 1894–1985. New York: Hill and Wang, 1996.Google Scholar
10Southern African Labour and Development Research Unit (SALDRU). Farm labour in South Africa: a review article. Social Dynamics 1976; 2(2): 93–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Cocks, J, Kingwill, RA. Land and Agrarian Reform: Transition and Continuity on Former White-Owned Farmland in an Eastern Cape Locality. Grahamstown: Institute of Social and Economic Research, Rhodes University, 1998.Google Scholar
12 World Health Organization. WHO Global Database on Child Growth and Malnutrition [online], 2005. Available at http://www.who.int/nutgrowthdb/en/. Accessed February 2005.Google Scholar
13Kruger, HS, Margetts, BM, Vorster, HH. Evidence for relatively greater subcutaneous fat deposition in stunted girls in the North West Province, South Africa, as compared with non-stunted girls. Nutrition 2004; 20(6): 564–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Lemke, S. Nutrition security, livelihoods and HIV/AIDS: implications for research among farm worker households in South Africa. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(7): 844–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Ryke, E. The social niche of farm dwellers: a social work strengths approach. PhD thesis, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, South Africa, 2004 [unpublished].Google Scholar
16 South African Department of Labour. The Farm Workers Report [online], 2003; p. 152. Available at http://www.nda.agric.za/publications. Accessed June 2003.Google Scholar
17Lemke, S, Jansen van Rensburg, NS, Vorster, HH, Ziche, J. Empowered women, social networks and the contribution of qualitative research: broadening our understanding of underlying causes for food and nutrition insecurity. Public Health Nutrition 2003; 6(8): 759–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18 South African Department of Labour. Basic Conditions of Employment. Sectoral Determination 8: Farm Workers [online], 2004. Available at http://www.labour.gov.za/download/6331/Sectoral%20Determination%208%20%20Farm%20Workers.doc. Accessed March 2005.Google Scholar