Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:24:50.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physical activity levels and body weight in a nationally representative sample in the European Union

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Maria Daniel Vaz de Almeida
Affiliation:
Instituto Superior de Ciências da Nutrição e Alimentação da Universidade do Porto, Portugal
Pedro Graça
Affiliation:
Instituto Superior de Ciências da Nutrição e Alimentação da Universidade do Porto, Portugal
Cláudia Afonso
Affiliation:
Instituto Superior de Ciências da Nutrição e Alimentação da Universidade do Porto, Portugal
Amleto D'Amicis
Affiliation:
Instituto Nazionale della Nutrizione, Rome, Italy
Raimo Lappalainen
Affiliation:
General Hospital Psychiatry, Tampere University Hospital, PO Box 2000, FIN-33521, Tampere and Finnish Institute for Behavioural Science, Tampere, Finland
Soren Damkjaer
Affiliation:
Centre of Sport Science, Copenhagen, Denmark
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives

The main objectives of this pan-European study were: (1) to identify different types of physical activity and the time devoted to them, (2) to assess physical activity/inactivity at work and in leisure time, and (3) to determine self-reported body weight and height.

Design and subjects

In each member state of the EU, approximately 1000 adults, aged 15 years or more, were selected to participate in an interview-assisted face-to-face questionnaire on physical activity and body weight. In each country, sample selection was quota-controlled to ensure national representativeness. Overall, 15 239 subjects in the EU completed the study.

Results

On average in the EU, nearly three-quarters of the population participate in some kind of activity. In general, the highest proportions of participants were found in the Nordic countries and the lowest in the southern ones. At the European level, the five most common activities include walking, gardening, cycling, keep fit and swimming. Higher participation rates were found among men, younger subjects and those with a higher level of education. The majority of Europeans fall within the normal body mass index (BMI) range but more than one-third are overweight (31%) or obese (10%) and 11% have a BMI below 20.

Conclusions

Several risk groups related to physical activity emerge from this survey: women, those with a lower level of education, older subjects, the overweight/obese and the underweight. Programmes to promote physical activity need to be tailored to the different groups identified in each country/region in order to increase adherence of non-participants and for the maintenance of those already engaged in activities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 1999

References

1Bouchard, C, Shephard, RJ, Stephens, T. Physical fitness and health: the model and key concepts. In: Bouchard, C, Shephard, RJ, Stephens, T, eds. Physical Activity, Fitness and Health: International Proceedings and Consensus Statement. Champain, IL: Human Kinetics, 1994; 7789.Google Scholar
2Åstrand, PO. Physical activity and fitness: evolutionary perspective and trends for the future. In: Bouchard, C, Shephard, RJ, Stephens, T, eds. Physical Activity, Fitness and Health: International Proceedings and Consensus Statement. Champain, IL: Human Kinetics, 1994; 98106.Google Scholar
3US Department of Health and Human Services. Guidelines for School and Community Programs for Lifelong Physical Activity Among Young People. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Atlanta: Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1997.Google Scholar
4US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity and Health: a Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 1996.Google Scholar
5Pate, R, Pratt, M, Blair, SN, et al. Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA 1995; 273: 402–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Sardinha, L, Teixeira, P. Physical activity and public health: a physical education perspective. Motricidade Humana. Portuguese J. Hum. Perform. Stud. 1995; 11: 316.Google Scholar
7Haskell, W. Dose-response issues from a biological perspective. In: Bouchard, C, Shephard, RJ, Stephens, T, eds. Physical Activity, Fitness and Health: International Proceedings and Consensus Statement. Champain, IL: Human Kinetics, 1994; 1030–9.Google Scholar
8World Cancer Research Fund, American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, Nutrition and the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective. Washington DC: AICR/WCRF, 1997.Google Scholar
9Wilmore, J. Increasing physical activity: alterations in body mass and composition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996; 63: S456–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10ILSI Europe. Healthy Lifestyles, Nutrition and Physical Activity. ILSI Europe Concise Monograph Series. Belgium: ILSI Europe, 1998.Google Scholar
11Kearney, JM, Kearney, MJ, McElhone, S, Gibney, MJ. Methods used to conduct the pan-European Union survey on consumer attitudes to physical activity, body weight and health. Public Health Nutr. 1999; 2: 7986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Garrow, JS. Treat Obesity Seriously. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1981.Google Scholar
13Lahelma, E, Rahkonen, O, Berg, MA, et al. Changes in health status and health behaviour among Finnish adults 1978–1993. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 1997; 23: 8590.Google ScholarPubMed
14Steptoe, A, Wardle, J, Fuller, R, et al. Leisure-time physical exercise: prevalence, attitudinal correlates and behavioural correlates among young Europeans from 21 countries. Prev. Med. 1997; 26: 845–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Blair, SN, Connelly, J. How much physical activity should we do? The case for moderate amounts and intensities of physical activity. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 1996; 67: 193205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Pollock, ML. Prescribing exercise for fitness and adherence. In: Dishman, RK, ed. Exercise Adherence. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1988; 259–77.Google Scholar
17Dishman, RK. Compliance/adherence in health related exercise. Health Psychol. 1982; 1: 237–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Epstein, FH, Higgins, M. Epidemiology of obesity. In: Björntrop, P, Brudoff, BN, eds. Obesity. JB Lippincott, 1992; 330–42.Google Scholar
19Schulz, LO, Schoeller, DA. A compilation of total daily energy expenditures and body weights in healthy adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1994; 60; 676–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Davies, PS, Gregory, J, White, A. Physical activity and body fatness in pre-school children. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 1995; 19: 610.Google ScholarPubMed
21Westerterp, KR, Goran, MI. Relationship between physical activity related energy expenditure and body composition: gender difference. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 1997; 21: 184–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22McElhone, S, Kearney, JM, Giachetti, I, Zunft, F, Martínez, JA. Body image perception in relation to recent weight changes and strategies for weight loss in a nationally representative sample in the European Union. Public Health Nutr. 1999; 2: 143151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Czajka, D, Parham, E, Fear of fat: attitudes towards obesity. Nutr. Today 1990; 25: 2632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Bellisle, F, Monneuse, MO, Steptoe, A, Wardle, J. Weight concerns and eating patterns: a survey of university students in Europe. Int. J. Obes. 1995; 19: 723–30.Google ScholarPubMed
25Dannenberg, AL, Keller, JB, Wilson, PWF, Castelli, WP. Leisure time physical activity in the Framingham offspring study. Description, seasonal variation, and risk factors correlates. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1989; 129: 7688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar