Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:27:19.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Out of the Box

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Geoffrey Cannon
Geoffrey Cannon
Affiliation:
[email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Out of the Box
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , February 2006 , pp. 5 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2006

References

1Leitzmann, C, Cannon, G, eds. The New Nutrition Science project [special issue]. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 667–804.Google ScholarPubMed
2The Giessen Declaration. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 783–6.Google Scholar
3Royal Society. Rigour, Respect and Responsibility: A Universal Ethical Code for Scientists. London: Royal Society, 2006. Also available at http://www.royalsoc.ac.ukGoogle Scholar
4Commission on the Nutrition Challenges of the 21st Century. Ending Malnutrition by 2020: An Agenda for Change in the Millennium. Final report to the ACC/SCN. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 2000; 21(3): 3–88.Google Scholar
5Uauy, R. Defining and addressing the nutritional needs of populations. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 773–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6National Food Alliance (NFA) (now Sustain). Children: Advertisers' Dream, Nutrition Nightmare? The Case for More Responsibility in Food Advertising. London: NFA, 1993. Also available at http://www.sustainweb.orgGoogle Scholar
7Hawkes, C. Marketing Food to Children: The Global Regulatory Framework. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004. Also available at http://www.who.intGoogle Scholar
8Institute of Medicine. Food Marketing to Children and Youth: Threat or Opportunity? Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006. Also available at http://www.nap.eduGoogle Scholar
9FAO/WHO. World Declaration and Plan of Action for Nutrition. Rome: FAO/WHO, 1992.Google Scholar
10FAO/WHO. World Declaration and Plan of Action for Nutrition. Draft submitted to the Preparatory Committee, Geneva, August 1992. Rome: FAO/WHO, 1992.Google Scholar
11Medawar, P. The limits of science [Chapter 4]. The Limits of Science. Oxford: University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
12Cannon, G, Leitzmann, C. The new nutrition science project. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 673–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Leitzmann, C, Cannon, G. Dimensions, domains and principles of the new nutrition science. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 787–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14WHO. Global and regional food consumption patterns and trends [Chapter 3]. Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series No. 916. Geneva: WHO, 2003.Google Scholar
15Poincaré, J. The Foundations of Science. Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1982 [originally published in three volumes in French, 1902–1908].Google Scholar
16Popper, K. Nature and convention [Chapter 5]. The Open Society and its Enemies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1945.Google Scholar
17Popper, K. The path of science [Chapter X, section 85]. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson, 1959 [originally published in German, 1934].Google Scholar
18Hart, H. Laws and morals [Chapter IX] The Concept of Law. Oxford: University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
19World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF)/American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR). Scientific evidence and judgement [Chapter 3]. Food, Nutrition and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: WCRF/AICR, 1997.Google Scholar
20WHO. Population nutrient intake goals for preventing diet-related chronic diseases [Chapter 5]. Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series No. 916. Geneva: WHO, 2003.Google Scholar
21Niven, W, ed. The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell. Cambridge: University Press, 1890.Google Scholar
22Dawkins, R. Snake oil and holy water. Forbes Magazine, 10 04 1999. Also available at http://www.forbes.com/asap/1999/0114/235Google Scholar
23Mooney, C. ‘Creation science’ and Reagan's ‘dream’ [Chapter 4]. The Republican War on Science. New York: Basic Books, 2005.Google Scholar
24Mount, H. Keep the divine out of biology lessons, federal judge rules. Daily Telegraph, 21 12 2005.Google Scholar
25US Supreme Court. Edwards v Aguillard. Decision. Amicus Curiae brief of 72 Nobel laureates, 17 state academies of science, and 7 other scientific organizations in support of appellees, 18 08 1986. Available at http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/edwards-aguillard/amicus1.htmlGoogle Scholar
26Gould, SJ. Walcott's vision and the nature of history [Chapter IV]. Wonderful Life. The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. London: Penguin, 1991.Google Scholar
27John, Paul II. Theories of Evolution. Address to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, 22 October 1997. Rome: Vatican, 1999. Also available at http://www.firstthings.com.ftissues/ft9703/articles/johnpaul.htmlGoogle Scholar
28Gould, SJ. Non-overlapping magisterial. Natural History 1999; 106(03): 16–22.Google Scholar
29Gould, SJ. Rocks of Ages. Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life. New York: Ballantine, 1999.Google Scholar
30UNESCO. Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Paris: UNESCO, 2005. Also available at http://www.unesco.org/shs/bioethicsGoogle Scholar