Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:52:26.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Not all dietary diversity scores can legitimately be interpreted as proxies of diet quality – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2017

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Corrigendum
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2017 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980016003402. Published online by Cambridge University Press, 20 December 2016

In the above paper, the authors name Koppmair was misspelt. The sentences:

We read with great interest the recently published article ‘Farm production, market access and dietary diversity in Malawi’ by Koopmair and colleagues.

In their study, Koopmair and colleagues collected 24 h dietary recall data of household 12 members combined, as well as of individual children below the age of 5 years and of their mothers

Should have read:

We read with great interest the recently published article ‘Farm production, market access and dietary diversity in Malawi’ by Koppmair and colleagues.

In their study, Koppmair and colleagues collected 24 h dietary recall data of household 12 members combined, as well as of individual children below the age of 5 years and of their mothers

References

Verger, E, Dop, MC & Martin-Prevel, Y. Not all dietary diversity scores can legitimately be interpreted as proxies of diet quality. Public Health Nutrition, Cambridge University Press, doi.org/ 10.1017/S1368980016003402.Google Scholar