Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T13:25:09.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mother's education is the most important factor in socio-economic inequality of child stunting in Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2013

Mohammad Hassan Emamian
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Islamic Republic of Iran
Mansooreh Fateh
Affiliation:
Center for Health Related Social and Behavioral Sciences Research, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Islamic Republic of Iran
Neman Gorgani
Affiliation:
Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Islamic Republic of Iran
Akbar Fotouhi*
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, PO Box 14155-6446, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Malnutrition is one of the most important health problems, especially in developing countries. The present study aimed to describe the socio-economic inequality in stunting and its determinants in Iran for the first time.

Design

Cross-sectional, population-based survey, carried out in 2009. Using randomized cluster sampling, weight and height of children were measured and anthropometric indices were calculated based on child growth standards given by the WHO. Socio-economic status of families was determined using principal component analysis on household assets and social specifications of families. The concentration index was used to calculate socio-economic inequality in stunting and its determinants were measured by decomposition of this index. Factors affecting the gap between socio-economic groups were recognized by using the Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition method.

Setting

Shahroud District in north-eastern Iran.

Subjects

Children (n 1395) aged <6 years.

Results

The concentration index for socio-economic inequality in stunting was −0·1913. Mother's education contributed 70 % in decomposition of this index. Mean height-for-age Z-score was −0·544 and −0·335 for low and high socio-economic groups, respectively. Mother's education was the factor contributing most to the gap between these two groups.

Conclusions

There was a significant socio-economic inequality in the studied children. If mother's education is distributed equally in all the different groups of Iranian society, one can expect to eliminate 70 % of the socio-economic inequalities. Even in high socio-economic groups, the mean height-for-age Z-score was lower than the international standards. These issues emphasize the necessity of applying new interventions especially for the improvement of maternal education.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 

Currently, one in every three children in the world suffers from malnutrition. This situation is especially prevalent among the poor and those who do not have access to adequate health education, healthy water and good sanitation( 1 ). A reduction in child and infant malnutrition is an essential step to reach the Millennium Development Goals, specifically the first and fourth ones. More than 70 % of all children diagnosed with undernutrition live in Asia( 1 ) and more than 90 % of the world's children with stunting live in Africa and Asia( 2 ). In 2011 approximately 165 million children below 5 years of age (26 % of under-5s) were stunted, a 35 % decrease from 1990 estimates( 2 ). In the Eastern Mediterranean region, malnutrition is the most serious and major contributor of death among children. On the other hand, the burden of disease resulting from insufficient nutrition is increasing( 3 ). Iran is classified as a country with low stunting prevalence; a national study conducted in 2004 found that the prevalence of stunting is 4·7 %. However, the stunting prevalence in the rural areas of some of its provinces is so severe that these regions need immediate intervention( Reference Sheikholeslam, Naghavi and Abdolahi 4 ). Our previous reports in Shahroud District showed that the prevalence of stunting was 10·3 % in children below 6 years of age and as high as 22 % in some regions of the district( Reference Emamian, Gorgani and Fateh 5 ). These data indicate considerable disparities in the extent of stunting. Research conducted in other parts of the world, especially in developing countries, also provides evidence of economic and socio-economic inequalities related to malnutrition( Reference Giashuddin, Kabir and Hasan 6 Reference Zere and McIntyre 13 ). Despite this, to the best of our knowledge, no study in Iran has examined the role of socio-economic inequality in child malnutrition and its determinants.

The present study aimed to describe the socio-economic inequality in stunting and its determinants in a community-based study in Shahroud, which can further be generalized to the entire country. Understanding the factors that affect inequality in stunting can lead to proper policy making and elimination of this inequality, the ultimate goal in health issues of all countries.

Methods

The present cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 1395 children aged below 6 years in Shahroud District, which is located in Semnan Province in north-eastern Iran. Shahroud, with an average socio-economic status, represents a typical Iranian population. The literacy rate in the over 6 years population is 84·5 %, which is slightly higher than the national average (79·5 %). Health-care services are delivered mainly by the Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, which is similar to other province centres. Previous studies have reported that the prevalence of stunting in Semnan Province is 4·2 %( Reference Sheikholeslam, Naghavi and Abdolahi 4 ). Thus, for the present study, the desired sample size was calculated to be 1380, considering a sampling error of 1·5 %, α of 0·05 and a design effect of 2. Following a multistage cluster sampling design, we divided Shahroud District into thirteen different geographic areas, which served as strata. We used 130 clusters of ten children each. Clusters were divided in proportion to the population of each stratum. The sampling frame was the complete list of all households for each stratum. Index households were selected using a systematic sampling procedure. Then skilled interviewers approached other households in the cluster by moving from the right side of the index household until ten children were sampled.

After interviewing the mothers and asking about demographic, nutritional and socio-economic status, the interviewers measured the weight and height of all children aged below 6 years old in the household. The height of all children aged below 2 years old was measured at the supine position with an infantometer. For children over 2 years of age, height was measured in the standing position using a portable stadiometer. Both the infantometer and the stadiometer had a digit counter reading precise to 1 mm. Their accuracy was tested with a metal tape every week. Weight was measured using an electronic flat scale for children over 2 years old and with an infant scale for children below 2 years old. Scales were calibrated with control weights every week. Anthropometric indices were calculated according to the latest growth reference data from the WHO (WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study). This standard is suitable for children worldwide( Reference de Onis, Garza and Onyango 14 ). The Anthro software from the WHO( 15 ) was used for the calculation of anthropometric indices. The status of these indices has been published previously( Reference Emamian, Gorgani and Fateh 5 ). To calculate the height-for-age Z-score (HAZ), the height of a particular child was subtracted from the median height of a child of same sex and age in the reference population of the WHO, and was divided by the standard deviation of the reference population. If HAZ for a child was below −2, the child was considered stunted.

The effects of independent variables on stunting were investigated using simple and multiple logistic regression analyses. To determine the socio-economic status of children, a principal component analysis was conducted on fifteen questions about social factors and home assets, and a new variable of asset index was constructed, as a proxy for socio-economic status. This variable, if calculated correctly, is considered to be a robust tool for grouping a population( Reference Wagstaff and Waters 16 ). It was divided into three tertiles in the simple and multiple logistic regression models and into two quantiles in the investigation of socio-economic gap. Then, the HAZ variable at different levels of this variable was assessed and the amount of inequality was calculated.

Inequality was calculated using the concentration index (C). This index was obtained from the concentration curve, where the society is ranked according to social groups and then the cumulative percentage of the population is plotted against its share of the entire disease or outcome( Reference Harper and Lynch 17 ). The concentration index is equal to twice the area between the concentration curve and the line of equality (45° line). The value of this index ranges from −1 to +1. In the case of no inequality in the distribution of a variable, C is zero, and as the value of C moves away from zero, the heterogeneity in the distribution of this variable among various social groups increases. C is negative when the curve is above the line of equality, indicating that the desired variable is concentrated in the unprivileged group. When C is positive, the curve is placed under the line of equality, indicating that the variable is concentrated in the privileged group( Reference Wagstaff, Paci and van Doorslaer 18 ).

The concentration index was calculated using the convenient covariance method, with the following formula:

$$C\, = \,2\,{\rm cov}({{y}_i},{{R}_i})/\mu, \eqno\rm$$

where y is a variable for which the inequality is to be measured, μ is the average of this variable, Ri is the fractional rank of the ith person in the distribution of socio-economic status and cov is the covariance( Reference O'Donnell, Van Doorslaer and Wagstaff 19 ). For the decomposition of C, we followed the procedure described by O'Donnell et al. ( Reference O'Donnell, Van Doorslaer and Wagstaff 19 ). First, in a logistic regression model, the HAZ was fitted against the independent variables. Then, the β coefficients of every independent variable were multiplied by the mean of that variable and the result was divided by mean HAZ. The resulting number was defined as elasticity. Next, for each of the independent variables, C was calculated. Multiplying C by elasticity gives the contribution of that variable in the total concentration index.

To better understand the role of factors that affect economic inequality in HAZ, we used the Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition method. This method was used for the first time in 1973 in research on labour market discrimination, where the gap between whites and blacks in terms of wages was divided into two different parts( Reference Blinder 20 , Reference Oaxaca 21 ). One part was attributed to the differences in education, work experience and other factors that influenced the difference in wages between the two groups, and the second part was attributed to discrimination. In other words, this technique separates into two parts the gap in the means of an outcome variable between two groups of the population: (i) the ‘explained’ portion that arises because of differences in the groups’ characteristics, such as education or insurance status; and (ii) an ‘unexplained’ portion, which can be attributed to the differential effects of these characteristics( Reference O'Donnell, Van Doorslaer and Wagstaff 19 ). The main advantage of this method is its ability to make this kind of distinction between the determinants of any type of inequality, and it is therefore very helpful for policy making( Reference O'Donnell, Van Doorslaer and Wagstaff 19 ). In the present study, the first quantile of the asset index variable was considered the group with high socio-economic status and the second quantile was considered the group with low socio-economic status.

In order to calculate the explained and unexplained components, we used the Oaxaca command in the STATA statistical software package version 10( Reference Jann 22 ). In calculating the confidence level of intervals, we took the cluster sampling effect into account.

The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. All procedures involving human subjects/patients were approved by the ethics committee of the Shahroud University of Medical Sciences. Verbal informed consent (in the presence of a witness) was obtained from all parents.

Results

In the present study, 1395 children aged below 6 years (female 50·2 %; male 49·8 %) were selected and all participated in the study (response rate = 100 %).

In the principal component analysis, four factors had eigenvalues >1 and accounted for 50·5 % of the variables’ variances: having a computer at home, smoking habits of the head of the family, opium usage by the head of the family and having a dishwasher at home. The asset index variable was constructed by summation of asset variables weighted by the first factor from the principal component analysis.

HAZ was calculated for 1390 children. The mean HAZ for the studied group was −0·4136 (95 % CI −0·4827, −0·3445). HAZ is described in more detail in Table 1, which also shows the effect of independent variables such as age, mother's education, father's education, family income, socio-economic status and sex on stunting, as investigated using univariate and multivariate regression. In the multivariate regression model, sex and, in some of the groups, age and mother's education had a statistically significant association with stunting. As seen in Table 1, the mean HAZ decreased with a change in socio-economic status from high to low, and the odds of stunting in the low socio-economic group was 1·67 times greater than that in the high socio-economic group. The value of C for this inequality was −0·1913 (se 0·0506). The concentration curve in Fig. 1 and the value of C, which is negative, show that this inequality was in favour of the high socio-economic group. The decomposition of C showed that among all investigated socio-economic factors, mother's education was the most important, accounting for 70 % of C (Table 2).

Table 1 Height-for-age Z-score (HAZ) and stunting at different levels of independent variables among children (n 1395) aged <6 years, Shahroud, Iran, 2009

*P < 0·05.

†In univariate logistic regression model.

‡In multivariate logistic regression model, adjusted for all variables in the table.

Fig. 1 Concentration curve of height-for-age Z-score (HAZ) and socio-economic status among children (n 1395) aged <6 years, Shahroud, Iran, 2009 (——, HAZ; – – –, 45° line)

Table 2 Decomposition of the concentration index (C) of height-for-age Z-score (HAZ) and socio-economic status into its contributing factors among children (n 1395) aged <6 years, Shahroud, Iran, 2009

Decomposition of the gap between the two socio-economic groups showed that their mean HAZ differed by 0·208. This gap was mainly due to the differences in the independent variables per se (the explained part of the gap) and, in this component, mother's education played the most significant role. The unexplained part included −53·8 % of the gap. Despite the value assigned to this section (−0·112 of the entire gap), it was not statistically significant. Its negative sign indicates that this part of the gap was in favour of the low socio-economic group. This implies that the low socio-economic group is more sensitive to improvements in the investigated variables, such as father's education and family income (which has a meaningful effect in this section; Table 3).

Table 3 Oaxaca decomposition of the height-for-age Z-score (HAZ) gap between socio-economic groups, children (n 1395) aged <6 years, Shahroud, Iran, 2009

Discussion

The results of the present study showed considerable socio-economic inequality in malnutrition among children below 6 years of age in Shahroud District, north-eastern Iran. This finding was expected because other studies have also emphasized the role of socio-economic inequality in malnutrition, especially in developing countries( Reference Van de Poel, Hosseinpoor and Speybroeck 12 ). In fact, in the present study we could determine the extent of inequality and the role of factors affecting this inequality. Other studies have also had similar results. For example, a study in Guatemala showed that economic inequality in stunting persisted in children aged 6–60 months with a C value of −0·22( Reference Lee, Houser and Must 9 ). A study of children below 5 years old in South Africa found evidence of socio-economic inequality in stunting with C = −0·215( Reference Zere and McIntyre 13 ). This inequality was also reported in Nigeria (C = −0·147)( Reference Uthman 10 ), India (C = −0·126)( Reference Kanjilal, Mazumdar and Mukherjee 7 ) and Bangladesh (C = −0·155)( Reference Giashuddin, Kabir and Hasan 6 ). When comparing the values of C, it must be noted that, in developing countries, the methods for measuring socio-economic status are different and these differences affect the reported inequalities( Reference Lindelow 23 ).

The results of multiple logistic regression analysis indicated the role of mother's education and child's sex on stunting (Table 1), but in this model, the effect of socio-economic status on stunting was not significant, despite an inequality in stunting between different socio-economic groups. The contribution of mother's education to this inequality was 70 %, which is almost twice that of family income. These factors are the most important determinants associated with socio-economic inequality in stunting. However, in contrast to our findings, a study of malnutrition in Ghana found that wealth had the maximum contribution (31 %) to malnutrition inequality and the share of mother's education was 5·5 %( Reference Van de Poel, Hosseinpoor and Jehu-Appiah 11 ). This contradiction may be primarily due to differences in the distribution of wealth among the studied populations, in investigated variables, and in methods used to divide the community into socio-economic groups. Other studies have also emphasized the role of mother's education in malnutrition, either by measuring inequality( Reference Kanjilal, Mazumdar and Mukherjee 7 , Reference Uthman 10 ) or by investigating malnutrition and its associated factors( Reference Holakouie Naieni, Fotouhi and Borhani 24 , Reference Sharifzadeh, Mehrjoofard and Raghebi 25 ).

The present results showed that HAZ was normal up to 11 months of age, but significantly below normal by 12–23 months of age (Table 1). The mean HAZ even in the high socio-economic group (−0·355) was less than the WHO standard value. Therefore, it is necessary that policy makers resolve this problem by developing effective interventions. On the other hand, the mean HAZ in the low socio-economic group was 0·208 less than that in the high socio-economic group. Decomposition of this gap showed that the explained part, caused by differences in independent variables, was the main reason for this gap and differences in mother's education between the two groups was the most important factor, contributing 59 % of the explained part. Father's education and family income were effective factors in the unexplained part. In fact, these factors indicate the extent of the effect of the independent variables on the mean HAZ. Few studies have identified factors influencing malnutrition by using the Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition method( Reference Joe, Mishra and Navaneetham 26 Reference Wagstaff, van Doorslaer and Watanabe 28 ). In these studies, the role of each investigated factor on malnutrition has been specified according to the investigated racial or socio-economic groups, and often educational status of the father or mother has been found to be one of the factors influencing malnutrition.

The strengths of the present study include its use of appropriate methodology in both sampling and measurement of the height and weight, along with the measurement of inequality and its associated factors. We also employed the latest standard prescribed by the WHO to measure malnutrition in this community-based study. However, given the study's cross-sectional nature, it is not possible to make causal inferences between malnutrition and the factors that were found to affect inequality. Longitudinal studies on a broader scale need to be carried out to confirm causality.

In summary, we showed a considerable socio-economic inequality in stunting in Shahroud and that maternal education was the most important factor associated with it. These data suggest that interventions to improve the educational status of women should be implemented as an important contributor to decreasing stunting in children and improving their nutritional status. Improved maternal education might reduce inequalities in this regard by as much as 70 %.

Acknowledgements

Sources of funding: The study was funded by Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, which had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article. Conflicts of interest: None declared. Ethics: This study, No. 8706, was an approved proposal in the Shahroud University of Medical Sciences and was approved by the ethics committee of this university. Before measuring the weight and height and questioning the families, we explained about the study and verbal consent was obtained. Authors’ contributions: M.H.E. contributed in preparation of the study design, conceptualized and conducted all statistical analyses, drafted the manuscript and was the primary author of the article. M.F. and N.G. contributed in conceptualization of the paper, were involved in data collection supervision, and critically revised the manuscript and approved it. A.F. conceived and designed the study, contributed in conceptualization of the paper and the statistical analyses, and critically revised the manuscript and approved it.

References

1. World Health Organization (2012) Water Sanitation Health. Water-related diseases. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/diseases/malnutrition/en/ (accessed October 2012).Google Scholar
2. UNICEF, World Health Organization & The World Bank (2012) Levels & Trends in Child Malnutrition. UNICEF–WHO–World Bank Joint Child Malnutrition Estimates. New York/Geneva/Washington, DC: UNICEF/WHO/World Bank.Google Scholar
3. World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean (2012) Nutrition. Nutrition in the Eastern Mediterranean. http://www.emro.who.int/entity/nutrition/ (accessed October 2012).Google Scholar
4. Sheikholeslam, R, Naghavi, M, Abdolahi, Z et al. (2008) Present situation and 10 year trend of malnutrition in under 5 years children, Iran. Iranian J Epidemiol 4, 2128.Google Scholar
5. Emamian, MH, Gorgani, N & Fateh, M (2011) Malnutrition status in children of Shahroud, Iran. Knowledge Health 6, 714.Google Scholar
6. Giashuddin, MS, Kabir, M & Hasan, M (2005) Economic disparity and child nutrition in Bangladesh. Indian J Pediatr 72, 481487.Google Scholar
7. Kanjilal, B, Mazumdar, P, Mukherjee, M et al. (2010) Nutritional status of children in India: household socio-economic condition as the contextual determinant. Int J Equity Health 9, 19.Google Scholar
8. Larrea, C & Kawachi, I (2005) Does economic inequality affect child malnutrition? The case of Ecuador. Soc Sci Med 60, 165178.Google Scholar
9. Lee, J, Houser, RF, Must, A et al. (2012) Socio-economic disparities and the familial coexistence of child stunting and maternal overweight in Guatemala. Econ Hum Biol 10, 232241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Uthman, OA (2009) Using extended concentration and achievement indices to study socio-economic inequality in chronic childhood malnutrition: the case of Nigeria. Int J Equity Health 8, 22.Google Scholar
11. Van de Poel, E, Hosseinpoor, AR, Jehu-Appiah, C et al. (2007) Malnutrition and the disproportional burden on the poor: the case of Ghana. Int J Equity Health 6, 21.Google Scholar
12. Van de Poel, E, Hosseinpoor, AR, Speybroeck, N et al. (2008) Socio-economic inequality in malnutrition in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 86, 282291.Google Scholar
13. Zere, E & McIntyre, D (2003) Inequities in under-five child malnutrition in South Africa. Int J Equity Health 11, 7.Google Scholar
14. de Onis, M, Garza, C, Onyango, AW et al. (editors) (2006) WHO Child Growth Standards. Acta Paediatr Suppl 450, 1101.Google Scholar
15. World Health Organization (2012) Child Growth Standards, WHO Anthro (version 3.2.2, January 2011) and macros. http://www.who.int/childgrowth/software/en/ (accessed November 2012).Google Scholar
16. Wagstaff, A & Waters, H (2005) How were the reaching the poor studies done? In Reaching the Poor with Health, Nutrition, and Population Services: What Works, What Doesn't, and Why, pp. 2746 [DR Gwatkin, A Wagstaff and AS Yasbeck, editors]. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
17. Harper, S & Lynch, J (2006) Measuring health inequalities. In Methods in Social Epidemiology, pp. 134168 [JM Oakes and JS Kaufman, editors]. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
18. Wagstaff, A, Paci, P & van Doorslaer, E (1991) On the measurement of inequalities in health. Soc Sci Med 33, 545557.Google Scholar
19. O'Donnell, O, Van Doorslaer, E, Wagstaff, A et al. (2008) Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data. A Guide to Techniques and Their Implementation. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
20. Blinder, AS (1973) Wage discrimination: reduced forms and structural estimates. J Hum Resour 8, 436455.Google Scholar
21. Oaxaca, R (1973) Male–female wage differentials in urban labor market. Int Econ Rev 14, 693709.Google Scholar
22. Jann, B (2008) A Stata implementation of the Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition. Stata J 8, 453479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Lindelow, M (2006) Sometimes more equal than others: how health inequalities depend on the choice of welfare indicator. Health Econ 15, 263279.Google Scholar
24. Holakouie Naieni, K, Fotouhi, A, Borhani, M et al. (2006) Risk factors for malnutrition in 6- to 30-months old children seen at health centers in Hormozgan Province. Iranian J Epidemiol 1, 2732.Google Scholar
25. Sharifzadeh, G, Mehrjoofard, H & Raghebi, S (2010) Prevalence of malnutrition in under 6-year olds in South Khorasan, Iran. Iranian J Pediatr 20, 435441.Google ScholarPubMed
26. Joe, W, Mishra, US & Navaneetham, K (2009) Inequalities in childhood malnutrition in India: some evidence on group disparities. J Hum Dev Capab 10, 417439.Google Scholar
27. Van de Poel, E & Speybroeck, N (2009) Decomposing malnutrition inequalities between scheduled castes and tribes and the remaining Indian population. Ethn Health 14, 271287.Google Scholar
28. Wagstaff, A, van Doorslaer, E & Watanabe, N (2003) On decomposing the causes of health sector inequalities with an application to malnutrition inequalities in Vietnam. J Econom 112, 207223.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Height-for-age Z-score (HAZ) and stunting at different levels of independent variables among children (n 1395) aged <6 years, Shahroud, Iran, 2009

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Concentration curve of height-for-age Z-score (HAZ) and socio-economic status among children (n 1395) aged <6 years, Shahroud, Iran, 2009 (——, HAZ; – – –, 45° line)

Figure 2

Table 2 Decomposition of the concentration index (C) of height-for-age Z-score (HAZ) and socio-economic status into its contributing factors among children (n 1395) aged <6 years, Shahroud, Iran, 2009

Figure 3

Table 3 Oaxaca decomposition of the height-for-age Z-score (HAZ) gap between socio-economic groups, children (n 1395) aged <6 years, Shahroud, Iran, 2009