Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:37:23.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Longitudinal changes in dietary intake in Scottish women around the menopause: changes in dietary pattern result in minor changes in nutrient intake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Helen M Macdonald ,
Susan A New  and
David M Reid
Helen M Macdonald*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Aberdeen, Medical School Buildings, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
Susan A New
Affiliation:
Centre for Nutrition and Food Safety, School of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK
David M Reid
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Aberdeen, Medical School Buildings, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective

To examine dietary change that has occurred over 5 to 6 years.

Subjects

A cohort of Scottish women (n=898) with a mean age of 47.5 years (range 45–54 years) at baseline.

Design

Dietary intake was assessed by validated food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and analysed using the UK Composition of Foods database.

Results

Since the first dietary assessment, mean daily energy intake had decreased from 8.2±2.3 to 7.9±2.2 MJ. The degree of low energy reporting (defined as ratio of energy intake to basal metabolic rate >1.1) had increased from 18.7% at baseline to 25.6% at follow-up. Low energy reporters were significantly heavier than ‘normal’ energy reporters (mean weight at follow-up, 68.9±12.6 vs. 66.8±11.3 kg) and could be deliberately restricting intake rather than underreporting. Overall there were decreases in intakes of red meat, processed meat and cheese, but increases in poultry and non-oily fish consumption. Consumption of bread, biscuits and cakes had gone down and there was an increase in cereal and rice/pasta consumption. Intake of potatoes had decreased whereas fruit intake had increased. There were small but statistically significant differences in intakes for most nutrients (>8% change). Nutrient intakes at both visits were similar across menopausal status and usage groups of hormone replacement therapy. Modifications to the computer version of the McCance and Widdowson nutrient database, which differed from the published version, were noted. These changes altered the original baseline values for our study.

Conclusions

The menopause per se is not a period of marked change in nutrient intake. Caution is advised when using computer databases of food compositions for longitudinal studies.

Keywords

Longitudinal dietary changesMenopauseWomenNutrientsFood-frequency questionnaire
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , June 2005 , pp. 409 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2005

Footnotes

†

Osteoporosis Research Unit, Victoria Pavilion, Woolmanhill Hospital, Aberdeen AB25 1LD, UK.

References

1Prevost, AT, Whichelow, MJ, Cox, BD. Longitudinal dietary changes between 1984–5 and 1991–2 in British adults: association with socio-demographic, lifestyle and health factors. British Journal of Nutrition 1997; 78: 873–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, ed. National Food Survey 2000: Annual Report on Food Expenditure, Consumption and Nutrient Intakes. London: The Stationery Office, 2001.Google Scholar
3Marriott, H, Buttriss, J. Key points from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey of adults aged 19–46 years. Nutrition Bulletin 2003; 28: 355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4New, SA, Bolton-Smith, C, Grubb, DA, Reid, DM. Nutritional influences on bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study in premenopausal women. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1997; 65: 1831–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Garton, MJ, Torgerson, DJ, Donaldson, C, Russell, IT, Reid, DM. Recruitment methods of screening programmes: trial of a new method within a regional osteoporosis study. British Medical Journal 1992; 305: 82–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Torgerson, DJ, Garton, MJ, Donaldson, C, Russell, IT, Reid, DM. Recruitment methods for screening programmes: trial of an improved method within a regional osteoporosis study. British Medical Journal 1993; 307: 99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Macdonald, HM, New, SA, Golden, MH, Campbell, MK, Reid, DM. Nutritional associations with bone loss during the menopausal transition: evidence of a beneficial effect of calcium, alcohol, and fruit and vegetable nutrients and of a detrimental effect of fatty acids. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2004; 79: 155–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Bolton-Smith, C, Woodward, M, Tunstall-Pedoe, H. The Scottish Heart Health Study. Dietary intake by food frequency questionnaire and odds ratios for coronary heart disease risk. I. The macronutrients. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1992; 46: 75–84.Google Scholar
9Bolton-Smith, C, Woodward, M, Tunstall-Pedoe, H. The Scottish Heart Health Study. Dietary intake by food frequency questionnaire and odds ratios for coronary heart disease risk. II. The antioxidant vitamins and fibre. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1992; 46: 85–93.Google ScholarPubMed
10Yarnell, JWG, Fehily, AM, Milbank, JE, Sweetnam, PM, Walker, CL. A short dietary questionnaire for use in an epidemiological study: comparison with weighed dietary records. Human Nutrition: Applied Nutrition 1983; 37A: 103–12.Google Scholar
11New, SA. An epidemiological investigation into the influence of nutritional factors on bone mineral density and bone metabolism. PhD thesis, University of Aberdeen, UK, 1995.Google Scholar
12Bodner, CH, Soutar, A, New, SA, Scaife, AR, Byres, M, Henderson, FD. Validation of a food frequency questionnaire for use in a Scottish population: correlation of antioxidant vitamin intakes with biochemical measures. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 1998; 11: 373–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Holland, B, Welch, AA, Unwin, ID, Buss, DH, Paul, AA, Southgate, DAT. McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and Royal Society of Chemistry. London: HMSO, 1991.Google Scholar
14Tunstall-Pedoe, H, Smith, WCS, Crombie, IK, Tavendale, R. Coronary risk factor and lifestyle variation across Scotland: results from the Scottish Heart Health Study. Scottish Medical Journal 1989; 34: 556–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Landis, JR, Koch, GG. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 1977; 33: 363–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Macdonald, HM, New, SA, Campbell, MK, Reid, DM. Longitudinal changes in weight in perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women: effects of dietary energy intake, energy expenditure, dietary calcium intake and hormone replacement therapy. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 2003; 27: 669–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Chan, W, Brown, J, Lee, SJ, Buss, DH. Meat, Poultry and Game. Fifth Supplement to McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and Royal Society of Chemistry. London: HMSO, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Reeve, L, Jorgensen, NA, DeLuca, HF. Vitamin D compounds in cows' milk. Journal of Nutrition 1982; 112: 667–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Hollis, BW, Roos, BA, Draper, HH, Lambert, PW. Vitamin D and its metabolites in human and bovine milk. Journal of Nutrition 1981; 111: 1240–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Gibson, SA, Ashwell, M. New vitamin D values for meat and their implication for vitamin D intake in adults. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 1997; 56: 116A.Google Scholar
21Department of Health. Nutrition and Bone Health: With Particular Reference to Calcium and Vitamin D. London: HMSO, 1998.Google Scholar
22Stallone, DD, Brunner, EJ, Bingham, SA, Marmot, MG. Dietary assessment in Whitehall II: the influence of reporting bias on apparent socioeconomic variation in nutrient intakes. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1997; 51: 815–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Gregory, J, Foster, F, Tyler, H, Wiseman, M. The Dietary and Nutritional Survey of British Adults. London: HMSO, 1990.Google Scholar
24Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. The Dietary and Nutritional Survey of British Adults: Further Analysis. London: HMSO, 1994.Google Scholar
25Henderson, L, Irving, K, Gregory, J, Bates, CJ, Prentice, A, Perks, J, et al. (2003) National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Adults aged 19 to 64 Years. Vol. 3: Vitamin and Minerals Intake and Urinary Analytes London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
26Department of Health. Dietary Reference Values for Food Energy and Nutrients for the United Kingdom. London: HMSO, 1991.Google Scholar
27Heitmann, BL, Lissner, L. Dietary underreporting by obese individuals – is it specific or non-specific? British Medical Journal 1995; 311: 986–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Bolton-Smith, C, Smith, WCS, Woolward, M, Tunstall-Pedoe, H. Nutrient intakes of different social-class groups: results from the Scottish Heart Health Study (SHHS). British Journal of Nutrition 1991; 65: 321–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Henderson, L, Gregory, J, Irving, K, Swan, G. National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Adults aged 19 to 64 Years. Vol. 2: Energy, Protein, Carbohydrate, Fat and Alcohol Intake. London: The Stationery Office, 2003.Google Scholar
30Price, GM, Paul, AA, Cole, TJ, Wadsworth, ME. Characteristics of the low-energy reporters in a longitudinal national dietary survey. British Journal of Nutrition 1997; 77: 833–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Drewnowski, A. Diet image: a new perspective on the food-frequency questionnaire. Nutrition Reviews 2001; 59: 370–2.Google ScholarPubMed
32Willett, WC. Accuracy of food-frequency questionnaires. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 72: 1234–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Willett, W. Invited commentary: a further look at dietary questionnaire validation. American Journal of Epidemiology 2001; 154: 1100–2; discussion 1105–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Byers, T. Food frequency dietary assessment: how bad is good enough? American Journal of Epidemiology 2001; 154: 1087–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Block, G. Invited commentary: another perspective on food frequency questionnaires. American Journal of Epidemiology 2001; 154: 1103–4; discussion 1105–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36Subar, AF, Thompson, FE, Kipnis, V. Subar, et al. respond to a further look at dietary questionnaire validation and another perspective on food frequency questionnaires. American Journal of Epidemiology 2001; 154: 1105–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar