Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:30:02.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development and validation of a new model of desirable dietary pattern (N-DDP) score for Chinese diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2013

Zhenghua Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Medicine, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, People's Republic of China Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, No. 17, 3rd Section of Ren Min Nan Road, Chengdu 610041, People's Republic of China
Wen Hu
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Nutrition, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
Ming Li
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, No. 17, 3rd Section of Ren Min Nan Road, Chengdu 610041, People's Republic of China
Rongxian Xu
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, Fujian University of Medical Science, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
Lei Shi
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, No. 17, 3rd Section of Ren Min Nan Road, Chengdu 610041, People's Republic of China
Chengyu Huang*
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, No. 17, 3rd Section of Ren Min Nan Road, Chengdu 610041, People's Republic of China
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To develop a new model of desirable dietary pattern (N-DDP) score for Chinese diets and to validate it against the nutrient-rich foods (NRF) index.

Design

The N-DDP score model followed the principles of the traditional DDP (T-DDP) score model (DDP-China for 2000) proposed in 1991 and of food grouping in the dietary pagoda for Chinese residents in 2007, and made detailed ratings by expressing the food weight coefficient, reasonable maximum limit of the score and an algorithm of the deserved score for each group of foods after considering current nutritional problems of Chinese residents. The N-DDP score model was validated against the NRF9·3 index with linear regression analysis and compared with the T-DDP score model.

Settings

One set of dietary data was extracted from the diet recommended by the dietary pagoda for Chinese residents in 2007 and the literature on dietary surveys in China. The other two sets of dietary data were from a dietary survey in 2011. DDP scores for all three dietary data sets were calculated with the N-DDP score model and the T-DDP score model.

Subjects

All items of dietary records in the three dietary data sets were included in the present study.

Results

All DDP scores obtained with the N-DDP score model were positively correlated (P = 0·000) with the NRF9·3 index. DDP scores obtained with the N-DDP score model had higher R2 with the NRF9·3 index than those of the T-DDP score model, as well as higher β values.

Conclusions

It can be considered that the N-DDP score is a more accurate and convenient tool to evaluate current individual and group diet for Chinese residents.

Type
Assessment and methodology
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 

In May 1988, the Regional Expert Consultation of the Asia-Pacific Network for Food and Nutrition (RECANFN) proposed the desirable dietary pattern (DDP) score to evaluate the nutritional quality of diets( 1 ). Based on foods, the DDP score of a group of foods is its energy percentage multiplied by a rating. The rating is defined by the nutrient content and nutritional quality of the group of foods. The total score of a diet is the sum of the DDP scores of all groups of foods( 1 ). The DDP score is popular because it is simpler and more convenient than methods evaluated on the basis of nutrients. RECANFN revised the model of the DDP score in 2003( 2 ). Chen proposed a DDP-China for 2000( Reference Chen 3 ) (using the traditional DDP (T-DDP) score model) in 1991. Chinese dietary patterns have changed greatly since then; some residents consume too few cereals, tubers and vegetables, and too much oil and animal foods, which may lead to overweight or obesity( Reference Wang 4 ). As one tool to evaluate dietary patterns, the DDP score also needs to be changed to help Chinese residents improve their dietary patterns to prevent both nutritional deficiencies and chronic non-communicable diseases.

Based on nutrients to encourage (including six to fifteen nutrients) and nutrients to limit (including saturated fat, added sugars and Na), a family of nutrient-rich foods (NRF) indices developed by Drewnowski et al.( Reference Drewnowski and Fulgoni 5 , Reference Fulgoni, Keast and Drewnowski 6 ) focused on the total nutritive value of foods within and among all food groups. For American diets, the index that was most closely correlated with the US Department of Agriculture's 2005 Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2005) was the NRF9·3 index, which contained nine nutrients to encourage and three nutrients to limit( Reference Fulgoni, Keast and Drewnowski 6 ). The NRF9·3 index is a scoring system that objectively evaluates the nutritional quality of foods, that better ranks foods on the basis of their nutrient content, and that can be applied to individual foods, meals, menus and even daily diets( Reference Drewnowski 7 , Reference Drewnowski 8 ). Therefore, the NRF9·3 index is considered a good indicator to validate the DDP score as well.

A diet with a DDP score of 100 points, which is high in nutrients to encourage and low in nutrients to limit, is best beneficial for human health. The aim of the present study was to develop a new model of DDP score (N-DDP score) for evaluating the nutritional quality of Chinese diets. For this purpose, we tried to follow the principles of the T-DDP score and of food grouping in the dietary pagoda for Chinese residents in 2007 (DPCR), to make detailed ratings expressing the food weight coefficient, reasonable maximum limit of the score and an algorithm of the deserved score for each group of foods. Moreover, the efficiency of evaluating the N-DDP score model was validated by means of the NRF9·3 index in as many dietary records as we could possibly collect and compared with the T-DDP score model.

Materials and methods

Data collection

Dietary data set 1 was extracted from the diets recommended by the DPCR( 9 ), the report of the Chinese Residents’ Nutrition and Health Survey (CRNHS) in 2002( Reference Wang 4 ) and the literature on dietary surveys all around the country in China( Reference Fu, Zhang and Wang 10 Reference Zhang, Yang and Xiang 58 ). Dietary data set 2 was obtained in our dietary history survey on individuals including a fatty liver group, a control group and total subjects in 2011 (L Shi, unpublished results). Dietary data set 3 was from the weighed food records of healthy adults in our energy metabolism study in 2011 (C Huang, unpublished results).

The mean energy and nutrient contents of thirteen groups of common foods were calculated based on data of the energy and nutrient contents of common foods from the China food composition tables( Reference Yang, Wang and Pan 59 ) (see Table 1). The thirteen groups of common foods were: (i) cereals (including wheat, rice, yellow corn grain); (ii) tubers (including potato, sweet potato (white flesh), sweet potato (red flesh)); (iii) meat (including pork (lean and fat), beef, mutton (lean and fat), chicken, duck); (iv) fish and shrimp (including grass carp, eel, common carp, goldfish carp, fatheaded carp, sardine, lobster); (v) eggs (including chicken eggs, duck eggs); (vi) milk (including liquid milk, yoghurt); (vii) beans and products (including soyabean, black soyabean, green soyabean); (viii) nuts and seeds (including walnut, chestnut, pine nut, almond kernel, cashew nut, hazelnut, peanut, sunflower seed); (ix) vegetables (including white radish, carrot, kidney bean, aubergine, tomato, hot pepper (red, small), hot pepper (pale green, sharp top), cucumber, pumpkin, garlic bulb, bok choi, rape, spinach, celery stem, lettuce stem, lotus root); (x) fruit (including apple, pear, peach, grape, orange, banana, watermelon); (xi) added oil and fat (including beef tallow, lard, rapeseed oil, peanut oil, salad oil, corn oil, sesame oil); (xii) sugars and sweeteners (including beet sugar, honey, peanut toffee, toffee, chocolate, peanut brittle); and (xii) beverages and wine (including carbonated beverages, tea beverages, fruit and vegetable juice beverages, protein beverages, coffee beverages, special usage beverages, beer, distilled spirit).

Table 1 Energy and nutrient contents per 100 g in thirteen groups of common foods

DF, dietary fibre; VA, vitamin A; RE, retinol equivalents; VE, vitamin E; α-TE, α-tocopherol equivalents; VC, vitamin C; SF, saturated fat; AS, added sugar.

Development of N-DDP score model

Table 2 shows the DDP-China for 2000 (T-DDP score model) proposed by Chen in 1991( Reference Chen 3 ). Adhering to the principles of DDP scoring in Table 2, the N-DDP score model was developed according to the following points: (i) the food grouping was defined based on the diets recommended by the DPCR( 9 ) and the thirteen groups of common foods mentioned above were included in the N-DDP score model; (ii) the energy percentage was defined based on the energy percentage of each group of foods at the 9205 kJ (2200 kcal) level of daily diet recommended by the DPCR( 9 ); (iii) the rating of foods ranged from 0·5 to 2·5 and was identified by considering both nutrients to encourage and nutrients to limit; and (iv) the maximum limit of the score and the algorithm of the deserved score for each group of foods were defined after considering current nutritional problems of Chinese residents. It was defined that the total score was <60 points for a poor dietary pattern, ranged from 60 to 80 points for a good dietary pattern, and was >80 points for a desirable dietary pattern.

Table 2 The T-DDP score model proposed by Chen( Reference Chen 3 )

T-DDP score, traditional DDP score (DDP-China for 2000); DDP, desirable dietary pattern.

Example for calculation of the scores for food items: (i) energy percentage from the food × rating = score; (ii) add all scores of food items = total score; (iii) when the score for a food item exceeds the maximum limit of the score, the score must be counted at the limit. For example: when the energy percentage from cereals = 85, 85 × 0·5 = 42·5; since the maximum limit for cereals is 40 the score must be limited to 40, not 42·5 as calculated.

Validation of N-DDP score model against NRF9·3 index

The validation was conducted by comparing the coefficients of determination (R 2) and regression coefficients (β) in regression analyses of DDP scores v. NRF9·3 indices among the two models. The DDP scores in the three dietary data sets were calculated with the N-DDP score model and the T-DDP score model, separately. The NRF9·3 indices in the three dietary data sets were calculated as the sum of the per cent nutrient reference value (NRV)( Reference Yin and Yang 60 ) per 418·4 kJ (100 kcal) of nutrients to encourage minus the sum of the per cent NRV per 418·4 kJ (100 kcal) of three nutrients to limit, as follows:

$$\[--&#x003E;&#x003C;$$l&#x003E; { {\rm{NRF}}\;{\rm{9}} \cdot {\rm{3}}\;{\rm{index}}\, \cr &amp; \quad= \,{\rm{\big\{ [protein}}\;({\rm{g}}/{\rm{418}} \cdot {\rm{4}}\;{\rm{kJ}}){\rm{]}}/({\rm{60}}\;{\rm{g}}) \cr &amp; \quad\quad+ \,[{\rm{dietary}}\;{\rm{fibre}}\;({\rm{g}}/{\rm{418}} \cdot {\rm{4}}\;{\rm{kJ}})]/({\rm{25}}\;{\rm{g}})\, \cr &amp; \quad\quad+ \, [{\rm{vitamin}}\;{\rm{A}}\;({\rm{\rmu g}}\;{\rm{RE}}/{\rm{418}} \cdot {\rm{4}}\;{\rm{kJ}})]/({\rm{800}}\;{\rm{\rmu g}}\;{\rm{RE}}) \cr &amp; \quad\quad+ \,[{\rm{vitamin}}\;{\rm{C}}\;({\rm{mg}}/{\rm{418}} \cdot {\rm{4}}\;{\rm{kJ}})]/({\rm{100}}\;{\rm{mg}})\, \, \cr &amp; \quad\quad +\,[{\rm{vitamin}}\,{\rm{E}}\;({\rm{mg}}\;{\rm{\alpha {\hbox-} TE}}/{\rm{418}} \cdot {\rm{4}}\;{\rm{kJ}})]/({\rm{14}}\;{\rm{mg}}\;{\rm{\alpha {\hbox-} TE}}) \cr &amp; \quad\quad+ \,[{\rm{Ca}}\;({\rm{mg}}/{\rm{418}} \cdot {\rm{4}}\;{\rm{kJ}})]/({\rm{800}}\;{\rm{mg}})\, \, \cr &amp; \qquad+ \,[{\rm{Fe}}\;({\rm{mg}}/{\rm{418}} \cdot {\rm{4}}\;{\rm{kJ}})]/({\rm{15}}\;{\rm{mg}})\, \cr\qquad+ \,[{\rm{Mg}}\;({\rm{mg}}/{\rm{418}} \cdot {\rm{4}}\;{\rm{kJ}})]/({\rm{300}}\;{\rm{mg}}) \cr &amp; \qquad + \,[{\rm{K}}\;({\rm{mg}}/{\rm{418}} \cdot {\rm{4}}\;{\rm{kJ}})]/({\rm{2000}}\;{\rm{mg}})\, \, \cr &amp; \qquad-\,[{\rm{saturated}}\;{\rm{fat}}\;({\rm{mg}}/{\rm{418}} \cdot {\rm{4}}\;{\rm{kJ}})]/({\rm{20}}\;{\rm{g}}) \cr &amp; \qquad - \,[{\rm{added}}\;{\rm{sugars}}\;({\rm{mg}}/{\rm{418}} \cdot {\rm{4}}\;{\rm{kJ}})]/({\rm{50}}\;{\rm{g}}) \cr &amp; \qquad- \,[{\rm{Na}}\;({\rm{mg}}/{\rm{418}} \cdot {\rm{4}}\;{\rm{kJ}})]/({\rm{2000}}\;{\rm{mg}}){\rm{\big\} }}\,\times \,{\rm{100,}} \cr} \eqno\rm$$

where RE is retinol equivalents and α-TE is α-tocopherol equivalents.

In the present study the Chinese NRV( Reference Yin and Yang 60 ) were used for calculating the NRF9·3 index suitable for Chinese diets. The value for added sugars was based on ∼10 % of a 8368 kJ (2000 kcal)/d diet, or 50 g/d( Reference Drewnowski and Fulgoni 5 ), which was one of the reference values of nutrients to limit( Reference Fulgoni, Keast and Drewnowski 6 ). Because there is no criterion for added sugars in Chinese NRV, 50 g of added sugars/d was adopted to calculate the NRF9·3 index.

Statistical analyses were performed with the statistical software package SPSS17·0 for Windows. Analyses of the difference in DDP scores between the T-DDP score model and the N-DDP score model were conducted using the paired-samples t test (two-sided). Linear regression analyses were conducted using DDP scores as the dependent variable and NRF9·3 indices as the independent variable. The regression model was: DDP score = α + β·NRF9·3 index. The percentage of the variation explained (coefficient of determination, R 2), regression coefficient (β) and P value of the models were used to assess validation of all models of DDP score( Reference Fulgoni, Keast and Drewnowski 6 ). P values < 0·01 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Table 3 shows the N-DDP score model developed in the present study and an example to calculate N-DDP score.

Table 3 The N-DDP score model and example to calculate N-DDP score

N-DDP score, a new model of DDP score; DDP, desirable dietary pattern.

Cereals and tubers were scored separately. In animal products, meat was scored alone, but fish and shrimp and eggs were combined to score. Milk, beans and products, nuts and seeds were united to score. Vegetables and fruit were integrated to score. Pure-energy foods, including added oil and fat, sugars and sweeteners, beverages and wine, were scored as a whole.

Example for calculation of the scores for food items: B = A × energy (kJ/100 g) shown in Table 1; C = energy percentage; D = rating; E = calculated score. If the calculated score for a food item is less than or equal to the maximum limit of the score, the deserved score = the calculated score. If the calculated score for a food item is greater than the maximum limit of the score, the deserved score = maximum limit of the score – [(calculated score – maximum limit of the score)/2]. *G = F – [(E – F)/2] = 4·00 − [(5·35 – 4·00)/2] = 3·33. Add all scores of food items = total score.

Table 4 describes the DDP scores and NRF9·3 indices in the three dietary data sets. The NRF9·3 indices among the three dietary data sets ranged from 39·31 (se 0·28) to 48·11 (se 0·40). The DDP scores ranged from 90·27 (se 0·70) to 95·79 (se 0·50) by the T-DDP score model, and from 66·06 (se 0·87) to 81·13 (se 0·57) by the N-DDP score model. Paired-samples t tests showed that the DDP score obtained by the N-DDP score model was significantly lower than that obtained by the T-DDP score model for each dietary data set (P = 0·000, two-sided), and that both the NRF9·3 index and the DDP scores obtained by the T-DDP score model and the N-DDP score model for the fatty liver group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P = 0·000, two-sided) in dietary data set 2.

Table 4 The description of DDP scores and NRF9·3 indices of the three dietary data sets

DDP, desirable dietary pattern; NRF, nutrient-rich foods; N-DDP score, a new model of DDP score; T-DDP score, traditional DDP score (DDP-China for 2000).

*The DDP scores obtained by the N-DDP score model were significantly lower than those obtained by the T-DDP score model (P = 0·000, two-sided) for each dietary data set.

†Both the NRF9·3 index and DDP scores obtained by the T-DDP score model and the N-DDP score model of the fatty liver group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P = 0·000, two-sided) in dietary data set 2.

Linear regression analyses of DDP score v. NRF9·3 index were conducted for the three dietary data sets for each of the two models (see Fig. 1). All DDP scores were positively correlated (P < 0·01) with NRF9·3 indices except that by the T-DDP score model in dietary data set 3 (P = 0·024; see Table 5). The N-DDP score model had higher R 2 values with the NRF9·3 index than the T-DDP score model in the three dietary data sets (0·668 v. 0·194 respectively for dietary data set 1, 0·713 v. 0·204 respectively for dietary data set 2 (fatty liver group), 0·556 v. 0·044 respectively for dietary data set 2 (control group), 0·723 v. 0·177 respectively for dietary data set 2 (total subjects), 0·273 v. 0·020 respectively for dietary data set 3), as well as higher β values (correspondingly: 2·431 v. 1·081, 1·700 v. 0·514, 1·400 v. 0·249, 1·699 v. 0·443, 0·818 v. −0·195).

Fig. 1 Linear regression of desirable dietary pattern (DDP) score v. nutrient-rich foods (NRF9·3) index for Chinese diets. (A1), (A2), (A3), (A4) and (A5) show the linear regression of DDP scores obtained by the traditional DDP (T-DDP) score model v. NRF9·3 indices in dietary data set 1, dietary data set 2 (fatty liver group), dietary data set 2 (control group), dietary data set 2 (total subjects) and dietary data set 3, respectively. (B1), (B2), (B3), (B4) and (B5) show the linear regression of DDP scores obtained by the new DDP (N-DDP) score model v. NRF9·3 indices in dietary data set 1, dietary data set 2 (fatty liver group), dietary data set 2 (control group), dietary data set 2 (total subjects) and dietary data set 3, respectively

Table 5 Results from the linear regression analyses of DDP scores v. NRF9·3 indices of the three dietary data sets

DDP, desirable dietary pattern; NRF, nutrient-rich foods; T-DDP score, traditional DDP score (DDP-China for 2000); β, regression coefficient; R 2, coefficient of determination.

Regression equation: DDP score = α + β·NRF9·3 index.

As shown in Table 6, the diets (A to G) recommended by DPCR in 2007 had higher NRF9·3 indices (range 47·20–50·33) and DDP scores (range 95·69–103·92) calculated by the N-DDP score model that were within the range of a desirable dietary pattern defined in the current paper. The urban, rural and total diets (H to I) for Chinese residents in 2002 had lower NRF9·3 indices (range 35·93–37·09) and lower DDP scores (range 64·75–67·45) calculated by the N-DDP score model.

Table 6 DDP scores and NRF9·3 indices of Chinese diets

DDP, desirable dietary pattern; NRF, nutrient-rich foods; T-DDP score, traditional DDP score (DDP-China for 2000); N-DDP score, a new model of DDP score; DPCR, the dietary pagoda for Chinese residents in 2007( 9 ).

The energy of diets A–G recommended by DPCR were 6694 kJ (1600 kcal), 7531 kJ (1800 kcal), 8368 kJ (2000 kcal), 9205 kJ (2200 kcal), 10 042 kJ (2400 kcal), 10 878 kJ (2600 kcal) and 11 715 kJ (2800 kcal), respectively. Diets H–J were urban, rural and total diets for Chinese residents in 2002( Reference Wang 4 ).

Discussion

Designation of energy percentage and rating of each group of foods

DPCR( 9 ) recommended the intake of each group of foods at seven levels of total daily energy (6694 kJ, 7531 kJ, 8368 kJ, 9205 kJ, 10 042 kJ, 10 878 kJ, 11 715 kJ) for Chinese residents. CRNHS in 2002 reported that the average energy intake for Chinese residents was 9421 kJ (2251·6 kcal) per standardized individual and day( Reference Wang 4 ). So in the present study, the energy percentage was defined based on the energy percentage of each group of foods at the 9205 kJ level of diet recommended by DPCR( 9 ).

The report of the CRNHS in 2002 showed that Chinese residents had universally insufficient intakes of vitamin A, vitamin B2, Ca, Fe, Zn and dietary fibre, and that some residents had low intakes of cereals, tubers and vegetables, and excessive intakes of oil and animal foods which led to excessive energy. The prevalence of chronic non-communicable diseases including overweight, obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and diabetes mellitus related to unreasonable diets was growing quickly( Reference Wang 4 ). The N-DDP score model designated a larger rating to foods rich in vitamin A, vitamin B2, Ca, Fe, Zn or dietary fibre (1·5 to milk; 2·0 to tubers and eggs; 2·5 to vegetables and fruit), and increased the maximum limit of the score for these groups of food. On the other hand, the N-DDP score model gave a smaller rating to foods rich in saturated fat, Na, added sugars and energy (0·5 to meat, nuts and seeds, and pure-energy foods), and strictly restricted the maximum limit of the score for these groups.

Cereals and tubers in scoring

Rich in dietary fibre, vitamin A, vitamin C, K and Mg( Reference Yang, Wang and Pan 59 ), tubers are encouraged for greater consumption among Chinese residents by Chinese dietary guidelines( 9 ); tubers ought to contribute to the total score. In the T-DDP score model, if cereals supply so much energy that their score exceeds the maximum limit, cereals will conceal tubers’ contribution to the total score. Consequently, tubers were better to be separated from cereals for scoring in the N-DDP score model. The maximum limit of the scores for ‘cereals’ and ‘tubers’ was increased greatly because these groups of foods were reported to have low intake among Chinese residents in the 2002 CRNHS( Reference Wang 4 ) and were encouraged for increased daily consumption by the 2007 Chinese dietary guideline( 9 ).

Animal products, nuts and seeds in scoring

In the N-DDP score model, animal products were split into three parts for scoring. Scoring ‘meat’ alone was undertaken to limit its contribution to the total score, which was expected to guide Chinese residents to decrease their intake of meat, especially red meat (pork, beef and mutton). The maximum limit of the score for ‘meat’ was strictly restricted because intake of this group of foods was reported to be excessive among Chinese residents in the 2002 CRNHS( Reference Wang 4 ) and it was recommended to consume meat properly every day by the 2007 Chinese dietary guideline( 9 ). Chinese dietary guidelines recommend Chinese residents to often eat ‘fish and shrimp’( 9 ) because they are high in excellent protein and low in fat and cholesterol( Reference Yang, Wang and Pan 59 ). Similarly, Chinese dietary guidelines recommend Chinese residents often to eat ‘eggs’( 9 ), which are rich in vitamins like vitamin A and minerals like Fe and Zn in spite of their high cholesterol content( Reference Yang, Wang and Pan 59 ). So ‘fish and shrimp’ and ‘eggs’ were better combined for scoring. Chinese dietary guidelines encourage Chinese residents to drink ‘milk’ and eat ‘beans and products’ every day( 9 ) in order to supplement Ca and for their excellent protein. Despite high energy content, ‘nuts and seeds’ are rich in MUFA, PUFA, vitamins and minerals( Reference Yang, Wang and Pan 59 ). Hence ‘nuts and seeds’ were better united with ‘milk’ and ‘beans and products’ to score, rather than to be classified as ‘pure-energy foods’. The combined maximum limit of the score for ‘fish and shrimp’ and ‘eggs’, as well as for ‘milk’, ‘beans and products’ and ‘nuts and seeds’, was properly restricted because these groups of foods were recommended to be consumed properly every day by the 2007 Chinese dietary guideline( 9 ).

Pure-energy foods in scoring

The report of the CRNHS in 2002( Reference Wang 4 ) showed that Chinese urban residents ingested up to 85·5 g of lipids per reference individual daily, which was up to 35 % of total daily energy and surpassed the upper limit of energy percentage. The results of the survey also showed that drinking alcohol had become a common behaviour( Reference Ma, Zhu and Hu 61 ). The overall heavy drinking rate of adults in China was 4·7 %, of which 8·4 % among males and 0·8 % among females( Reference Ma, Du and Hao 62 ). The epidemiological and experimental evidence indicated that a greater consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages was associated with weight gain (i.e. overweight, obesity, or both)( Reference Malik, Schulze and Hu 63 ). Most of the beverages for sale in China contain mainly added sugars or sweeteners that supply a lot of energy( Reference Li, Piao and Yang 64 ). In conclusion, the pure-energy foods including ‘added fats and oils’, ‘sugars and sweeteners’ and ‘beverages and wine’ were scored as a whole, and strictly restricted to a maximum limit score of 6 points, which was expected to guide Chinese residents to reduce their intake of pure-energy foods.

The Chinese nutrient reference values and the American daily values

The NRF9·3 index was calculated based on the reference values of the American daily values (DV)( Reference Drewnowski and Fulgoni 5 , Reference Fulgoni, Keast and Drewnowski 6 ). According to the food labelling guide revised by the US Food and Drug Administration( 65 ), DV were established for reporting nutrients in nutrition labelling of food products. Similarly, the Chinese Nutrition Society established NRV for the same purpose( Reference Yin and Yang 60 ). The Chinese NRV were established in the light of two indices of Chinese dietary reference intakes: (i) recommended nutrient intake (RNI) and (ii) adequate intake (AI). The values of some nutrients are different between American DV and Chinese NRV. For instance, vitamin A is 1665 μg RE (1 μg RE = 3 IU for vitamin A) for American DV, but 800 μg RE for Chinese NRV; and Ca is 1000 mg for American DV, but 800 mg for Chinese NRV. Without question, the American DV were proposed for American foods eaten by American residents and the Chinese NRV were established for Chinese foods eaten by Chinese residents. So the Chinese NRV may be more appropriately used in the NRF9·3 index for evaluating the nutritional quality of Chinese diets in the present study.

Validation with three dietary data sets

In the present study, the three dietary data sets used to validate the N-DDP score model were collected from dietary surveys conducted between 2002 and 2011. The average DDP score was ranked as a ‘desirable’ dietary pattern by the T-DDP score model and ranked as a ‘good’ dietary pattern by the N-DDP score model for each dietary data set. Paired-samples t tests showed that the DDP scores obtained by the N-DDP score model were significantly lower than those obtained by the T-DDP score model, which indicates that the N-DDP score might be more reasonable to evaluate current diets. The N-DDP score model might reflect and adapt to the great change in dietary patterns of Chinese residents. Both the NRF9·3 index and the DDP score obtained by the N-DDP score model of the fatty liver group were significantly lower than those of the control group in dietary data set 2, which indicates that the N-DDP score model could be used to evaluate the dietary patterns of groups as well as individuals.

In summary, the N-DDP score model detailed the rating coefficients, the maximum limit of the scores and the algorithm of the deserved score on the basis of the nutritional value of each group of foods and current nutritional problems of Chinese residents. The regression analysis with higher coefficient of determination (R 2) and regression coefficient (β) validated that the N-DDP score model was more accurate and sensitive to evaluate the dietary pattern for Chinese residents. Moreover, it was simple and convenient to calculate the total score of diets based on the energy percentage of each group of foods.

Conclusion

It can be considered that the N-DDP score model is a more accurate and convenient tool to evaluate current individual and group diets for Chinese residents.

Acknowledgements

Sources of funding: The present study was supported by the projects of the Ministry of Education (2010SCU21002) and of the Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province (09ZC1270). Conflicts of interest: None of the authors have a known conflict of interest. Ethics: Ethical approval was not required. Authors’ contributions: The study was designed by C.H. and Z.Z. The dietary data were collected and sorted by Z.Z., W.H., R.X. and L.S. The data analyses were performed by Z.Z. and M.L. The manuscript was written, edited and reviewed by Z.Z. and C.H.

References

1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific (1989) Report of the Regional Expert Consultation of the Asian Network for Food and Nutrition on Nutrition and Urbanization. Bangkok: FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.Google Scholar
2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific (2003) Selected Indicators of Food and Agriculture Development in Asia-Pacific Region 1992–2002. Bangkok: FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.Google Scholar
3. Chen, CM (1991) Dietary guidelines for food and agriculture planning in China. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Food, Nutrition and Social Economic Development, pp. 3745 [J Jiang, editor]. Beijing: China Science and Technology Publishing House (in Chinese).Google Scholar
4. Wang, L (2005) The Report of Chinese Residents’ Nutrition and Health Survey in 2002. Comprehensive Report, pp. 20, 7177. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House (in Chinese).Google Scholar
5. Drewnowski, A & Fulgoni, V III (2008) Nutrient profiling of foods: creating a nutrient-rich food index. Nutr Rev 66, 2329.Google Scholar
6. Fulgoni, VL III, Keast, DR & Drewnowski, A (2009) Development and validation of the nutrient-rich foods index: a tool to measure nutritional quality of foods. J Nutr 139, 15491554.Google Scholar
7. Drewnowski, A (2010) The nutrient rich foods index helps to identify healthy, affordable foods. Am J Clin Nutr 91, issue 4, 1095S1101S.Google Scholar
8. Drewnowski, A (2009) Defining nutrient density: development and validation of the nutrient rich foods index. J Am Coll Nutr 28, issue 4, 421S426S.Google Scholar
9. Chinese Nutrition Society (2008) Chinese Dietary Guideline. Lhasa: The Tibetan People's Publishing House (in Chinese).Google Scholar
10. Fu, P, Zhang, J, Wang, C et al. (2008) Study on the dietary pattern and trends among middle and aged in Chinese population. Acta Nutr Sinica 30, 1921 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
11. Zhai, F & Yang, X (2006) The Report of Chinese Residents’ Nutrition and Health Survey in 2002. The Intake Status of Diets and Nutrients, pp. 143144. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House (in Chinese).Google Scholar
12. Zhang, J, He, Y, Liu, J et al. (2010) Investigation on dietary nutrition intake status of residents in Hebei Province in 2007. Public Health Manage 26, 647649 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
13. Liu, Z, Wang, S, Ren, L et al. (1999) Evaluation and suggestion of urban and rural resident diets of Anhui Province. Anhui Prev Med 5, 1113 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
14. He, R & Su, R (2008) The investigation about the dietary pattern and nutritive status of medical students in Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities. J Inner Mongolia Univ Nationalities 23, 417420 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
15. Li, L, Wang, X, Wang, P et al. (2008) Study on dietary pattern and nutrients intakes for rural residents in Puyang City. Modern Prev Med 35, 26552657 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
16. Li, H, Huang, X, Fu, C et al. (2006) Survey on diet, nutrition and health status among residents in Qinzhou City. Pract Prev Med 13, 11581161 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
17. Yu, H, Zhao, Z, Hao, F et al. (2000) Study on dietary and nutritional status of urban community inhabitants in Jinan. Acta Acad Med Shangdong 38, 250252 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
18. Jiang, W, Fu, C & Zhu, S (2002) The nutritional status of teachers of middle school in a Liangshuikou mountain area. Suzhou Univ J Med Sci 22, 109111 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
19. Huang, W, Sun, Y & Zhou, D (2010) Investigation on diet among college students in a university of Wuhan. Chin J Public Health 26, 11321133 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
20. Zhao, H (2008) Analysis on changes of residents’ dietary pattern in Qinghai Province during 1985–2005. Modern Prev Med 35, 28702872 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
21. Xue, J, Sun, L & Zhao, C (2009) Analysis of dietary on soldiers of a troop in Shanxi. Modern Prev Med 36, 22682269 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
22. Yi, G, Tang, X, Zhang, C et al. (2006) The changes in dietary pattern of Hubei residents from 1982 to 2002. Acta Nutr Sinica 28, 195197 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
23. Huang, G, Tian, H, Wang, X et al. (2007) Dietary survey of urban and rural residents in Tianjin from 2000 to 2004. Acta Nutr Sinica 29, 435437 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
24. Wang, X, Huang, G, Tian, H et al. (2007) Investigation on dietary nutrition of urban residents in Tianjin from 2000 to 2004. Chin J Public Health 23, 12451247 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
25. Zhou, W, Zhu, Y & Chen, X (2008) Nutrition status of the rural residents’ diet in Wuxi City during from 2000 to 2007. Occup Health 24, 17971799 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
26. Yang, G, Jiang, Y & Sun, L (2007) A survey on the nutrition status of urban residents in Shiyan City in 2006. Pract Prev Med 14, 399400 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
27. Liang, J, Huang, L, Xia, D et al. (2006) The association of diet nutrition and health status in population of Bama county in China. J Youjiang Med Coll Nationalities 28, 170173 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
28. Zhang, Y, Ma, W, Xie, H et al. (2010) Change trend of dietary pattern among Guangdong residents, 1982–2002. S China J Prev Med 36, 15 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
29. Ma, W, Deng, F, Xu, Y et al. (2005) The study on dietary intake and nutritional status of residents in Guangdong in 2002. S China J Prev Med 31, 15 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
30. Yu, H, Qiao, X & Xu, G (2001) Change of inhabitant dietary pattern in Shandong Province during 1988–1997. J Hyg Res 30, 111112 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
31. Tang, Z, Chen, X, Han, Y et al. (2005) The study on nutrition and health status of residents in Guangxi in 2002. Guangxi Prev Med 11, 257263 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
32. Zhang, Y, Jiang, G, Wang, S et al. (1999) Investigation on dietary pattern of residents in urban and rural areas of Guizhou Province. Guang Dong Wei Liang Yuan Su Ke Xue 6, 3739 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
33. Yang, B, Pan, X, Li, Y et al. (2009) Survey of dietary patterns and nutrients intake status of residents in Hainan. China Trop Med 9, 16731676 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
34. Lin, M, Li, G, Liu, J et al. (2004) An analysis of residents’ nutrition and health status in Hunan Province in 2002. Pract Prev Med 11, 11121115 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
35. Zhang, J, Li, S, Yang, Y et al. (2008) Analysis of dietary and nutrition status of Shandong residents. Chin J Food Hyg 20, 6567 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
36. Lu, Z, Ma, J, Guo, X et al. (2008) Study on dietary pattern and nutrition status among rural residents in Midwestern Shandong Province. Chin J Prev Contr Chron Non-commun Dis 16, 612614 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
37. Yuan, B, Pan, X, Dai, Y et al. (2007) Study on transition of dietary pattern in Jiangsu Province. Acta Nutr Sinica 29, 569572 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
38. Wang, C, Liang, Z, Wei, P et al. (2001) Changes in dietary pattern and certain nutrition-related diseases in urban and rural residents of Jiangsu Province in 1990s. J Hyg Res 30, 299301 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
39. Hu, W & Huang, X (2002) Survey of dietary patterns and nutrients intake status of residents in Jiangxi Province from 1990 to 2000. Occup Health 18, 6769 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
40. Zou, S, Shi, A, Gao, W et al. (2006) The changing trend of the dietary pattern in Shanghai residents. Shanghai J Prev Med 18, 311314 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
41. Tang, H, Su, H, Fang, H et al. (2010) Survey on the nutrition and health status of residents in Minhang District of Shanghai. Chin J Dis Contr Prev 14, 11191121 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
42. Liu, H, Liu, H, Wu, J et al. (2008) Analysis on diet nutrition and health status of community residents. Chin J Dis Contr Prev 12, 437440 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
43. Li, X, Du, D & Wang, Z (2007) Survey on nutritional and health status of rural residents in Shimen County. Pract Prev Med 14, 12751277 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
44. Li, Y, Chen, Y & You, K (2006) Study on the dietary nutrition status and change trends of residents in Shunyi. Chin J Food Hyg 18, 5455 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
45. Ning, H, Tang, Y, Liu, H et al. (2007) The changes of dietary pattern of urban resident s in Tangshan from the year 1990 to 2004. Chin J Nat Med 9, 4244 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
46. Li, J, Jiang, G, Yang, Y et al. (2007) Study on diet pattern and association with hyperlipidemia in residents of Tianjin City. Chin J Prev Contr Chron Non-commun Dis 15, 228230 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
47. Zhou, W & Wu, Y (2006) Survey on dietary pattern of residents in Wuxi. Modern Prev Med 33, 18971898 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
48. Wu, Y & Xu, Z (2006) Analysis on nutritional status of residents in rural area of Wuxi. Chin Primary Health Care 20, 8384 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
49. Wang, C, Wei, P, Yu, J et al. (2001) The effect of food consumption changes on the morbidity of certain nutrition- related diseases in Xuzhou urban residents during the past decade. Acta Acad Med Xuzhou 21, 332335 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
50. Chen, X, Tang, Z, Han, Y et al. (2006) Assessment of dietary pattern of residents in Guangxi with Chinese balance dietary pagoda. Appl Prev Med 12, 265268 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
51. Yuan, J & Wan, Q (2004) The transition of dietary pattern of residents in rural and urban of Yunnan between 1982 and 2002. Acad J Kunming Med Coll 25, 49 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
52. Zhong, J, Yu, M, Liu, L et al. (2006) Study on the dietary nutrition intake level in Zhejiang Province. Dis Surveill 21, 670672 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
53. Zhu, S, Fu, C, Jiang, W et al. (2004) The ten years’ changes of diet and nutrition in peasants in the coast of Zhejiang Province. Acta Nutr Sinica 26, 7173 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
54. Gong, Q, Shao, S, Li, Z et al. (2006) Analysis of dietary pattern of different groups of residents in Zhengzhou City. Modern Prev Med 33, 18931895 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
55. Liu, P, Zhang, Y & Zhao, M (2000) Analysis of dietary pattern and nutritional status of rural inhabitants in Chongqing. Acta Univ Sci Med Chongqing 25, 144147 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
56. Liu, P, Li, J, Lian, X et al. (1999) Survey and analysis of dietary pattern and nutritional status of the urban residents in Chongqing. Acta Univ Sci Med Chongqing 24, 146149 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
57. Liu, X, Liu, D, Yang, X et al. (2007) Analysis on dietary pattern and nutritional status of Chongqing residents. Modern Prev Med 34, 33213323 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
58. Zhang, H, Yang, X, Xiang, X et al. (2005) The investigation of nutrition for Chongqing citizen. Modern Prev Med 32, 13601363 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
59. Yang, Y, Wang, G & Pan, X (2009) China Food Composition. Book 1, 2nd ed., pp. 4301. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
60. Yin, S & Yang, Y (2009) Nutrient Reference Values for Labeling Purposes in China, pp. 192193. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House (in Chinese).Google Scholar
61. Ma, G, Zhu, D, Hu, X et al . (2005) The drinking practice of people in China. Acta Nutr Sinica 27, 362364 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
62. Ma, G, Du, S, Hao, L et al . (2009) The prevalence of heavy drinking among adults in China. Acta Nutr Sinica 31, 213217 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
63. Malik, VS, Schulze, MB & Hu, FB (2006) Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 84, 274288.Google Scholar
64. Li, M, Piao, J & Yang, X (2009) Analysis of the energy value in familiar beverages of Beijing supermarket. Acta Nutr Sinica 31, 9495 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
65. US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (2009) Guidance for industry. A food labeling guide. XIV. Appendix F: calculate the per cent daily value for the appropriate nutrients. http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/GuidanceDocuments/FoodLabelingNutrition/FoodLabelingGuide/default.htm (accessed February 2011).Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Energy and nutrient contents per 100 g in thirteen groups of common foods

Figure 1

Table 2 The T-DDP score model proposed by Chen(3)

Figure 2

Table 3 The N-DDP score model and example to calculate N-DDP score

Figure 3

Table 4 The description of DDP scores and NRF9·3 indices of the three dietary data sets

Figure 4

Fig. 1 Linear regression of desirable dietary pattern (DDP) score v. nutrient-rich foods (NRF9·3) index for Chinese diets. (A1), (A2), (A3), (A4) and (A5) show the linear regression of DDP scores obtained by the traditional DDP (T-DDP) score model v. NRF9·3 indices in dietary data set 1, dietary data set 2 (fatty liver group), dietary data set 2 (control group), dietary data set 2 (total subjects) and dietary data set 3, respectively. (B1), (B2), (B3), (B4) and (B5) show the linear regression of DDP scores obtained by the new DDP (N-DDP) score model v. NRF9·3 indices in dietary data set 1, dietary data set 2 (fatty liver group), dietary data set 2 (control group), dietary data set 2 (total subjects) and dietary data set 3, respectively

Figure 5

Table 5 Results from the linear regression analyses of DDP scores v. NRF9·3 indices of the three dietary data sets

Figure 6

Table 6 DDP scores and NRF9·3 indices of Chinese diets