Hypertension is the most important risk factor for CVD and contributes more than other diseases to the global burden of disease( Reference Lim, Vos and Flaxman 1 , 2 ). Changes of lifestyle, especially weight reduction, physical activity, high potassium consumption and the reduction of alcohol and salt intakes, could stop the high prevalence of suboptimal blood pressure and the incidence of hypertension( Reference Appel 3 , Reference Dickinson, Mason and Nicolson 4 ). There is convincing evidence that high sodium intake is directly associated with suboptimal blood pressure and hypertension( Reference Mozaffarian, Fahimi and Singh 5 – Reference Graudal, Hubeck-Graudal and Jurgens 8 ) and consequently with increased risk of developing CVD( Reference Mozaffarian, Fahimi and Singh 5 , Reference Aburto, Ziolkovska and Hooper 7 , Reference Strazzullo, D’Elia and Kandala 9 ). Therefore, the WHO recommends a restriction of salt intake in adults to 5 g/d and of sodium consumption to <2 g/d. For children, the maximum level for adults should be adjusted downwards respecting their energy requirements( 10 ). However, the results of recently published studies and meta-analyses show that salt and sodium intakes are considerably higher than recommended in most countries worldwide( Reference Mozaffarian, Fahimi and Singh 5 , Reference Brown, Tzoulaki and Candeias 11 ).
In addition to the high morbidity and mortality, CVD also leads to a high economic burden. The global cost of CVD was estimated at $US 863 billion in 2010 and is projected to rise by 21 % to $US 1044 billion in 2030( Reference Bloom, Cafiero and Jané-Llopis 12 ). It is hypothesized that a considerable amount of these expenses could be saved by a reduction of salt intake( Reference McLaren 13 , Reference Cappuccio, Capewell and Lincoln 14 ).
Two strategies to prevent CVD are possible: (i) the high-risk approach, targeting individuals with hypertension; or (ii) population-wide interventions, targeting the entire population( Reference Rose 15 , Reference Knorpp and Kroke 16 ). To date, several targeted or population-wide interventions aimed at reducing salt intake have been introduced in various countries worldwide, including salt reduction in processed foods by the food industry (either voluntary or mandatory), taxes on salty foods, use of salt substitutes, health education campaigns via mass media or in schools, declaration of salt content on food packaging as a label or traffic light, and dietary advice for people of a certain age and/or blood pressure( Reference McLaren 13 , 17 – Reference Karppanen and Mervaala 20 ).
Both the high incidence and prevalence of CVD worldwide and the knowledge that risk factors like salt intake are modifiable indicate the relevance of this public health nutrition topic. However, economic efficiency – additionally to effectiveness – should be a major issue within decision making in public health nutrition. Thereby, an optimal allocation of scarce resources can be secured and a comparison with other, including therapeutic options, is possible( Reference Hughes and Margetts 21 – Reference Knorpp and Kroke 23 ).
Different study types exist to analyse economic consequences: full economic evaluations consider both cost and benefits and compare these among at least two alternative interventions, such as cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and cost-utility analysis (CUA); while partial evaluations examine either cost or benefits and do not compare different alternatives( Reference Hughes and Margetts 21 , Reference Drummond, Sculpher and Torrance 24 ). So far, some efforts to structure and analyse the cost-effectiveness of salt reduction activities have been undertaken( Reference Wang and Bowman 25 – Reference Neal 27 ). However, these studies included both partial and full economic evaluations worldwide that reported cost-effectiveness or potential cost savings due to a salt reduction. Consequently, the in-depth comparison of results between the different study types and countries was not possible. Therefore, by including only full economic evaluations conducted in member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the present systematic literature review aimed to examine whether different approaches of population-wide and targeted salt reduction interventions are cost-effective.
Methods
Search strategy and study selection criteria
The systematic literature search was undertaken in July 2016 in the databases EMBASE, MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, Health Technology Assessment Database and web search engines. Search items were ‘salt’ or ‘sodium’ with ‘intake’, ‘restriction’ or ‘reduction’, ‘cardiovascular disease’, ‘hypertension’, ‘blood pressure’ or ‘cardiovascular risk’. To limit results to economic studies, ‘economic evaluation’, ‘economic/cost-analysis’, ‘cost–benefit’, ‘cost-effectiveness’, ‘health care cost’, ‘resource allocation’ and ‘quality adjusted life year’ were added to the search string (see online supplementary material, Table S1). In addition, reference lists of full-text articles meeting the study selection criteria were reviewed. Studies were restricted to English, German or French publications. There was no time limit placed on the literature search. Two of the authors (E.S., D.N.) independently reviewed each article and studies were selected by eligibility criteria set a priori. Inclusion was limited to CEA and CUA reporting findings of population-wide or targeted salt reduction interventions. Only studies from OECD member countries were included to enable better comparability. Outcomes were measured as life years gained (LYG), disability-adjusted life years (DALY) or quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Cost-effectiveness was shown in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). All comparators were eligible for inclusion, but usually ICER were reported against the alternative ‘status quo’ or ‘no intervention’.
Data extraction, synthesis and study quality assessment
Data were extracted with a data extraction form based on the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination( 28 ). Results relating to cost-effectiveness were synthesized by comparing the given ICER.
Additionally, incremental costs were converted to international dollars (Intl.$) in 2015 by using the OECD purchasing power parity coefficient( 29 ) adjusted by the OECD deflator( 30 ). Quality assessments were based on the guidelines for economic submissions to the British Medical Journal by Drummond and Jefferson( Reference Drummond and Jefferson 31 ) to detect common flaws. One item relating to generalizability issues was added, as recommended( 28 ). Differences in methodology were discussed.
Results
A total of 1351 articles were identified. After screening and applying the eligibility criteria, fourteen full economic analyses( Reference Nghiem, Blakely and Cobiac 32 – Reference Selmer, Kristiansen and Haglerød 45 ) describing cost-effectiveness of salt reduction in Australia, Europe, New Zealand and the USA were included. Figure 1 shows the study selection process.
Fig. 1 Flowchart showing the selection of studies included in the present review, search conducted in July 2016 (NHS EED, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database; HTA, Health Technology Assessment Database; DALY, disability-adjusted life years; QALY, quality-adjusted life years; LYG, life years gained)
Basic characteristics of the included studies
The included studies analysed one to ten different salt-specific interventions to prevent hypertension and CVD with the same model (Table 1). Altogether, sixty-two simulations are presented, which can be classified into seven population-wide or targeted interventions to reduce salt intake: (i) voluntary and (ii) mandatory salt reductions in processed foods in general or in particular food groups by the food industry through the setting of maximum salt levels or the regulation of the use of salt substitutes; (iii) a sodium or salt tax; (iv) targeted dietary advice for people of a certain age or with certain blood pressure; (v) declaration of salt content on food packaging (labelling); (vi) salt awareness campaigns via mass media; and (vii) a cap-and-trade approach, setting a maximum amount of food-grade salt released to the market. Additionally, in three studies a combination of different approaches was modelled and in further two studies unspecified interventions assuming a certain salt reduction were analysed. The methods applied in the included studies differed in model, time horizon, perspective, outcome measurement, assumption of effectiveness and types of considered cost (Table 1). The choice of perspective (e.g. of society, the health system or patients) influenced which types of cost and which outcomes were considered in the analysis( Reference Drummond, Sculpher and Torrance 24 ). A societal perspective for judging the cost-effectiveness of salt reduction interventions was taken by six studies. Regarding the effectiveness of the individual interventions, a wide span of achieved salt reduction (0·0 to 4·6 g/d) was assumed. Depending on this reduction, the modelled decrease of systolic blood pressure showed a similar range from 0·0 up to 10 mmHg. The different cost types covered the health cost (i.e. potential cost savings due to reduced incidence and prevalence of CVD as well as additional health costs associated with the gain of life years), the cost of implementing and maintaining the salt-specific intervention, and productivity costs reflecting potential savings in productivity losses due to absenteeism caused by CVD (Table 1).
Table 1 Summary of the fourteen studies included in the present systematic review
SBP, systolic blood pressure; HC, health cost; IC, intervention cost; PC, productivity cost; LL, lifelong; HS, health system; SC, society; QALY, quality-adjusted life years; LYG, life years gained; DALY, disability-adjusted life years; Y, yes; N, no.
* In cases where reductions of salt and SBP were not given explicitly in the studies, estimates were recalculated using the indicated sources.
† Nghiem et al. (2016), Wilson et al. (2016) and Nghiem et al. (2015) are based on the same model.
‡ European sub-region with very low mortality rates.
§ 0·4–0·5 g/h (gender-specific) with 4600 h/year.
║ Gender-specific.
¶ Depending on elapsed time after intervention’s uptake.
** Age-specific.
†† Depending on current blood pressure and ethnicity.
‡‡ Depending on reference.
Cost-effectiveness of reducing salt
The gain in QALY over the time horizon compared with no intervention or the status quo ranged from 200 by dietary advice in New Zealand( Reference Nghiem, Blakely and Cobiac 34 ) to 2·06 million by a voluntary salt reduction in the USA( Reference Smith-Spangler, Juusola and Enns 43 ). Studies that analysed the outcome as LYG reported an increase of 1970 by a declaration of salt content on food packaging (labelling) in England( Reference Collins, Mason and O’Flaherty 35 ) up to 1·3 million by the voluntary salt reduction in the USA mentioned before( Reference Smith-Spangler, Juusola and Enns 43 ). DALY averted amounted to 1700 by dietary advice in Australia( Reference Cobiac, Vos and Veerman 42 ) up to 1·3 million by a mandatory salt reduction in Europe( Reference Murray, Lauer and Hutubessy 44 ).
As an additional benefit cost savings could be achieved. The incremental cost comprised the health-care cost in the case of no intervention or the status quo minus the sum of the intervention cost and potential cost savings in health care and/or productivity due to a salt reduction over the time horizon. This total incremental cost in international dollars (in 2015) ranged from an actual cost of 517 million Intl.$ over a lifelong time horizon by dietary advice in Australia( Reference Cobiac, Vos and Veerman 42 ) to a cost saving of −109 billion Intl.$ over 10 years by an unspecified intervention in the USA( Reference Bibbins-Domingo, Chertow and Coxson 41 ). The majority of simulations (fifty-seven out of sixty-two) resulted in net cost savings.
The total incremental benefit and cost of each simulation are shown in Fig. 2(a). To provide a more detailed view on the fifty-one scenarios showing similar incremental benefits and costs, an enlarged section of this cost-effectiveness plane is displayed in Fig. 2(b). Most estimates are in the fourth quadrant, meaning they are associated with higher benefit at lower cost and therefore are considered cost-effective. Five simulations are in the first quadrant, so they bring higher benefit at higher cost. The combined consideration of costs and benefits by means of the ICER (Table 2) shows that the five simulations with a positive ICER are simulations of voluntary and mandatory salt reduction in Europe as well as dietary advice in New Zealand and Australia. According to the authors( Reference Murray, Lauer and Hutubessy 44 ), the two simulations of a salt reduction in processed foods are considered highly cost-effective according to the standard of the WHO (ICER<per capita gross domestic product/DALY).
Fig. 2 Cost-effectiveness plane of salt reduction scenarios: (a) display of the sixty-two modelled scenarios in the included studies; (b) enlarged display of fifty-one scenarios as indicated by the selection box in Fig. 2(a). Incremental benefit is measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained, life years gained (LYG) or disability-adjusted life years (DALY) saved, incremental cost in international dollars (Intl.$) in 2015 (base scenarios of original studies); ●, voluntary salt reduction; ▲, mandatory salt reduction; ■, sodium/salt tax; 
, not specified; +, dietary advice; –, salt-specific health education (via labelling or salt awareness campaigns); ♦, combination of different approaches (e.g. health education, salt reduction in processed foods, labelling and/or taxes); 
, cap-and-trade approach. Outcome measure as: ■, QALY; 
, LYG; 
, DALY. Note: Interventions in the 4th quadrant (IV) are considered cost-saving (i.e. higher benefit at lower cost compared with status quo); results in the 1st quadrant (I) are associated with higher benefit at higher cost
Table 2 Summary of the cost-effectiveness of salt reductions, as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in international dollars (Intl.S) in 2015
QALY, quality-adjusted life years; LYG, life years gained; DALY, disability-adjusted life years; LL, lifelong; HS, health system; SC, society.
* Transforming ICER into Intl.$ 2015 is based on point estimates of base scenarios in original studies; confidence intervals or results of sensitivity analyses were not considered.
† Depending on assumed effectiveness.
‡ Depending on included types of processed foods.
§ Depending on included measures.
║ Depending on target group.
¶ European sub-region with very low mortality rates.
Altogether, a particularly low ICER of <−3072 Intl.$/QALY gained, −6187 Intl.$/LYG and <584 Intl.$/DALY saved, respectively, was assessed for population-wide salt reductions, like a tax on sodium or salt, voluntary or legislative collaboration with industry to reduce salt content in processed foods and the declaration of salt content on food packaging (Table 2). Combinations of different population-wide interventions (e.g. salt reduction in processed foods, salt tax, labelling and/or awareness campaigns) also were cost-saving (−3690 Intl.$/QALY and <−3250 Intl.$/LYG, respectively). Dietary advice for a high-risk group was a rather cost-ineffective intervention (24 600 Intl.$/QALY and up to 303 900 Intl.$/DALY) compared with population-wide approaches. As can be seen from Table 2, the estimates of five scenarios in the USA and England show considerably lower ICER with up to −109 324 Intl.$/QALY gained by a not further specified population-wide salt reduction of 3 g/d and −316 870 Intl.$/LYG by labelling over 10 years compared with the status quo. While the scenarios in the USA are associated with both high savings in medical costs and a high increase of QALY, the low ICER of the labelling in England is attributable to high cost savings and comparatively low LYG of 1970.
In nine studies the cost-effectiveness of different interventions to reduce salt intake were evaluated and compared with the same model. Here, the salt reduction in processed foods in general or in particular food groups was dominant – that is, higher benefit at lower costs or cost savings – compared with dietary advice( Reference Nghiem, Blakely and Cobiac 32 , Reference Nghiem, Blakely and Cobiac 34 , Reference Dodhia, Phillips and Zannou 38 , Reference Cobiac, Vos and Veerman 42 ), and a salt awareness campaign was dominant compared with labelling( Reference Nghiem, Blakely and Cobiac 34 , Reference Mason, Shoaibi and Ghandour 36 ). Other results were inconsistent; for example, the comparison of salt reduction in processed foods showed both lower( Reference Collins, Mason and O’Flaherty 35 , Reference Cobiac, Vos and Veerman 42 ) and higher( Reference Wilson, Nghiem and Eyles 33 , Reference Murray, Lauer and Hutubessy 44 ) ICER for a voluntary compared with a mandatory approach, and a salt/sodium tax was both dominant( Reference Smith-Spangler, Juusola and Enns 43 ) to a salt reduction by the food industry and dominated( Reference Nghiem, Blakely and Cobiac 34 ) by it (Table 2).
Methodological quality of included studies
The quality assessment showed flaws in the conduct of nearly each study. Compared with the Drummond and Jefferson/British Medical Journal checklist( Reference Drummond and Jefferson 31 ), no study fulfilled all thirty-six items (Table 3). The most frequent flaws were missing details of input data (items 8 to 13), a missing justification of choice of economic evaluation (item 7) and no discussion of the generalizability of the results (item 36). Instead of giving details of the design and results of the effectiveness studies (items 9 and 10) or the methods to value health states (items 12 and 13), most studies stated the reference of the original study. Altogether, four out of fourteen studies presented insufficient details of the methods for the estimation of costs (item 17) or the model used (item 20), and eight studies missed details regarding the execution of sensitivity analysis (items 26 to 29). Nine studies from New Zealand, England, Turkey, Finland, USA and Europe used validated models.
Table 3 Quality assessment of included studies: number of studies fulfilling the items of the Drummond and Jefferson/British Medical Journal checklist( 28 , Reference Drummond and Jefferson 31 )
?, not clear; NA, not appropriate.
Discussion
The present systematic review of fourteen full economic evaluations showed that the vast majority (95 %) of modelled interventions aiming at a salt reduction were cost-effective or even cost-saving. Especially low ICER were found for an unspecified intervention, salt/sodium taxes, voluntary or mandatory salt reductions in processed foods by the food industry and the declaration of salt content on food packaging (labelling). Interestingly, salt-specific health education like salt awareness campaigns via mass media or labelling had a surprisingly low ICER( Reference Collins, Mason and O’Flaherty 35 , Reference Mason, Shoaibi and Ghandour 36 ), although a combination of the provision of information and structural changes might be the most effective strategy to facilitate behavioural modifications( 46 , 47 ). The low ICER of salt awareness campaigns can be attributed to the wide reach of this intervention and its comparatively low cost per subject. Targeted dietary advice for people of a certain age or with certain blood pressure was a rather cost-ineffective approach. Thus, the results demonstrate that especially population-wide salt reductions might be a cost-effective way to prevent hypertension and CVD in OECD member countries. As the salt intake through processed foods is high in OECD member countries( Reference Brown, Tzoulaki and Candeias 11 ), a reduction of salt content by the food industry and gastronomy seems to be effective, for example collaborating with food manufacturers and sellers, by setting maximum levels of salt content, by regulating salt substitution or by implementing taxes on salt. Especially a salt reduction in staple foods like bread could effectively lower salt intake, probably without influencing quality( Reference Kanzler, Hartmann and Gruber 48 ) or even being noticed by consumers( Reference Girgis, Neal and Prescott 49 ). However, comprehensive analyses of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of salt reduction in gastronomy are lacking until now.
A published review( Reference Wang and Labarthe 26 ), recently updated( Reference Wang and Bowman 25 ), concluded there is economic evidence that interventions aiming at a reduction of salt intake in the whole population, like salt reduction in processed foods, mass media campaigns, taxes and not further specified approaches, are very cost-effective in the prevention of hypertension. According to the authors, these kinds of interventions are associated with a gain in QALY, provide savings in medical costs and productivity costs due to averted hypertension cases, and/or are low in cost of implementation. Altogether the authors narratively described the results of seventeen studies, of which twelve analysed costs and benefits of salt reduction in OECD member countries: six partial and six full economic evaluations. Furthermore, the results of these reviews demonstrate that salt reductions – either population-wide or targeted – in non-OECD member countries are cost-effective as well, suggesting that they are one of the ‘best buys’ globally( 50 ). To achieve a salt reduction a combined strategy of food reformulation by the food industry and gastronomy, public awareness campaigns and changes in the environment is recommended by the WHO( 46 ) and EU( 47 ). Interestingly, such a combination of different approaches was associated with higher ICER( Reference Nghiem, Blakely and Cobiac 34 , Reference Mason, Shoaibi and Ghandour 36 ). Therefore, this approach might be most effective to achieve a salt reduction, but it might not be the most cost-effective approach.
A comparison of ICER of different studies has to be done carefully due to the different methods and assumptions applied in each model. Consequently, the comparison of results in the studies that analysed different interventions with the same model gives the best hint on the most cost-effective strategy. Unfortunately, the results are not consistent, showing that the assumptions made might be more important than the chosen intervention in influencing the resulting cost-effectiveness.
Measurement of cost-effectiveness
Therefore, the results are highly influenced by the methods applied and have to be seen in the context of the simplifications and assumptions made. Especially the chosen perspective for an economic analysis has an important impact on the resulting cost-effectiveness( Reference Drummond, Sculpher and Torrance 24 ). Of the different possible viewpoints, the societal perspective is the broadest one and might be the most appropriate for addressing public health topics. Nevertheless, only half of the included studies applied this perspective. Furthermore, the quality assessment showed flaws in all included studies. Particularly the missing details of the input data led to a lack of transparency and comprehensibility of the composition of the ICER. Similarly, the authors of earlier reviews( Reference Wang and Bowman 25 ) stated that until now economic evaluations of population-wide salt reductions lack consideration of all key aspects to provide convincing and robust data on cost-effectiveness. This is partly attributed to imprecise model development or lack of transparency and partly to general problems assessing the costs and the benefits in public health nutrition.
Assessment of the cost of a salt reduction
Measuring the total costs from a societal perspective means to consider almost all occurring expenditures and savings independently of any stakeholder group( Reference Hughes and Margetts 21 , Reference Drummond, Sculpher and Torrance 24 ). Beside direct and indirect health and intervention costs arising at the health system, for patients or society, this includes changes in the consumption of resources in other sectors; for example, in the food industry due to demanding costly food reformulations or in the salt industry by decreasing sales. The assessment of these aspects is complex or even impossible, and sometimes also negligible( Reference Hughes and Margetts 21 , Reference Drummond, Sculpher and Torrance 24 ). For example, as products are reformulated within the natural product life cycle, it is often assumed that consideration of cost for the reformulation might lead to an overestimation of costs of implementation( Reference Collins, Mason and O’Flaherty 35 , Reference Smith-Spangler, Juusola and Enns 43 ). Similarly, there are various methods and recommendations for the measurement of indirect costs like productivity losses( Reference Drummond, Sculpher and Torrance 24 ).
Assessment of the health benefits of a salt reduction
The measurement of benefits, on the other hand, is complicated by the assessment of the effectiveness of a salt reduction owing to inconsistent data on the resulting systolic blood pressures and cardiovascular events. Although several meta-analyses show the effectiveness of a salt reduction in decreasing blood pressure( Reference He, Li and MacGregor 6 , Reference Aburto, Ziolkovska and Hooper 7 ), the impact on cardiovascular mortality is less obvious, showing both significant reductions of CVD and stroke deaths( Reference Aburto, Ziolkovska and Hooper 7 , Reference Strazzullo, D’Elia and Kandala 9 ) and the denying of positive effects( Reference Taylor, Ashton and Moxham 51 ). Additionally, due to a rather small benefit for individuals from population-wide salt reductions, this small benefit can easily be compensated by a small risk of negative effects( Reference Rose 15 ). That is why there are still some critics questioning the effectiveness and appropriateness of population-wide reductions of salt intake, especially pronouncing the so-called J-curve phenomenon with a higher cardiovascular risk for sodium under 3 g/d and over 7 g/d (<7·5 and >18 g salt daily) compared with a sodium consumption of 4–6 g/d( Reference O’Donnell, Mente and Rangarajan 52 ). The discussion about flawed results, reverse causality, insufficient sample size and appropriateness of the measurement of sodium and salt intakes following the publication of new results on the association between salt intake and cardiovascular events illustrates the fixed positions of salt proponents and opponents. However, this leads to inconsistent data and eventually to confusion of and refusal to act by policy decision makers and public health practitioners.
Unfortunately, until now there are only few analyses of the effectiveness of real-life interventions aiming at a salt reduction. Only five studies in the present review( Reference Nghiem, Blakely and Cobiac 34 , Reference Collins, Mason and O’Flaherty 35 , Reference Cobiac, Magnus and Lim 37 , Reference Cobiac, Vos and Veerman 42 , Reference Smith-Spangler, Juusola and Enns 43 ) used realistic assumptions based on experiences made in New Zealand and Great Britain. Therefore, the chosen interventions to achieve a certain salt reduction differed in the included CEA, as well as the assumed effectiveness – depending on compliance, reach or duration. Table 1 shows that these input parameters vary in the studies and gives an explanation for the wide range of results. This is emphasized by the results of the sensitivity analyses of one research team( Reference Wilson, Nghiem and Eyles 33 , Reference Nghiem, Blakely and Cobiac 34 ), showing that the uncertainty in the assumed salt reduction and the effect on the CVD risk contributed the most to uncertainty in the resulting incremental cost and benefit.
Other relevant aspects
There are other relevant factors influencing the cost-effectiveness of a salt reduction, but which are neglected in most CEA and CUA until now. One example is the delay in benefit accumulation after the implementation of the intervention, which occurs first due to a lag in blood pressure reduction( Reference Lewington, Clarke and Qizilbash 53 ) and second as a stepwise salt reduction seems the most accepted method( Reference Penney 54 ).
Furthermore, most studies concentrate on the adult population, although the long-term health gains of a salt reduction probably would be the highest among the youngest. In the current review only one study( Reference Murray, Lauer and Hutubessy 44 ) explicitly considered children in its analyses. Unintended changes of the eating pattern following a population-wide salt reduction, such as due to a negative cross-price elasticity after introducing a salt tax( Reference Mytton, Gray and Rayner 55 ), could diminish the overall benefit of this intervention. On the other hand, preventive effects regarding cancer and other diseases( Reference He and MacGregor 56 ) suggest additional benefits of a salt reduction and therefore a higher cost-effectiveness. The exclusion of these aspects reduces the complexity of the model but might also lead to biased estimates about the overall cost-effectiveness of salt reductions. But this is a general problem of complex public health (nutrition) interventions and not unique for salt reduction strategies.
Limitations
Some limitations of the present review have to be mentioned. First, publication bias was not investigated here. Second, it might be possible that suitable analyses, for example unpublished grey literature by governments or non-profit organizations, were not detected in our search. In addition, some methodological aspects impeded the summarizing of economic evidence. The heterogeneity in the applied modelling techniques, the study perspective and the considered cost types made it harder to establish comparable results. Additionally, direct medical costs are country-specific as they are influenced by national treatment standards and the medical compensation system of each country( Reference Reinhold, Brüggenjürgen and Schlander 57 ) and the effectiveness of a salt reduction depends on the current salt consumption of the population: the reduction of high salt intakes is rather easy while the further reduction of moderate salt levels seems to be more difficult – as seen in the UK( 58 ). Therefore, the results show the current state of research, which is in favour of population-wide salt reductions. Nevertheless, the precise results might not be generalized or transferred to other settings and countries easily due to the methodological aspects mentioned before. More likely, the major benefit of the current systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of salt reduction strategies might be the identification of the different methods, models and assumptions applied, as proposed elsewhere( Reference Anderson 59 ). The strengths and weaknesses as well as the key variables shown might help to develop further models of salt reduction in different countries and settings.
Conclusion
In summary, the present systematic review of full economic evaluations highlights that salt reductions could be cost-effective in the prevention of hypertension and CVD. Especially single population-wide approaches had a favourable ICER, whereas combinations of different (population-wide) strategies were associated with lower cost savings and targeted interventions mostly were not cost-effective. Although the results might be highly influenced by the specific context, the chosen models and perspectives, the assumptions made and the considered costs, the consistent results regarding cost-effectiveness in 95 % of the modelled scenarios emphasize the introduction of salt reductions in OECD member countries.
Nevertheless, so far, published CEA of targeted and population-based salt reductions have insufficiently included all relevant aspects in their models, due to a lack of data, difficulties in assessing the cost and benefits, and simplified assumptions to reduce the complex models. Of particular note are the inconsistent and sometimes confusing results concerning a realistic estimation of the effectiveness and potential negative effects of a salt reduction. Reflecting the quote of G. Box, ‘All models are wrong, but some are useful’, it should at least be tried to obtain better model estimates and an improved comparability between studies and settings, enabling conclusions about the economic effects of salt reduction to be derived.
Acknowledgements
Financial support: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Conflict of interest: None. Authorship: E.S. was responsible for study concept and design, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript drafting. D.N. was responsible for study concept and design, data analysis, supervision, manuscript revision. A.K. was responsible for study concept and design, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. Ethics of human subject participation: Not applicable.
Supplementary Material
To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980017000593
