Obesity, diabetes and hypertension disproportionately affect racial/ethnic minority groups and diverse Asian-American ethnic subgroups face unique challenges related to chronic health problems. Diet-related health conditions including cancer, heart disease and stroke are among the leading causes of death in Asian-American subgroups( 1 ). Further, estimates of diabetes rates range from 3·9 % for Chinese individuals to 36·4 % for Filipino women( Reference Staimez, Weber and Narayan 2 ). Asian Americans are also often diagnosed with diabetes at a lower BMI threshold than other ethnic groups( 3 ), creating added risk for delayed or missed diabetes diagnoses. Furthermore, obesity prevalence tripled among Asian-American adults from 2·7 % in 1992 to 13·3 % in 2010 and overweight prevalence nearly doubled from 23·2 to 43·1 %( Reference Singh and Lin 4 ). In contrast, the obesity prevalence for the US adult population doubled during the same time interval( Reference Singh and Lin 4 ). In New York City, obesity prevalence among adults and children is 42·9 and 24·6 %, respectively( Reference Au, Kwong and Chou 5 , Reference Rajpathak and Wylie-Rosett 6 ).
Food marketing has been identified as a major driver of obesity and diet-related diseases, which is largely due to promotion of products high in fat and/or energy( Reference Seiders and Petty 7 ). Companies advertise products in ways that create positive attitudes that influence social norms towards increased consumption of products( Reference Grier, Mensinger and Huang 8 ). Targeted marketing refers to the use of common characteristics, needs and behaviours that appeal to a certain consumer group and the positioning of products in the mediums most likely to reach those consumers (e.g. McDonald’s television advertisement (ad) in Mandarin)( Reference Grier and Kumanyika 9 ). While targeted marketing campaigns can serve as health promotion tools, targeted ads have also been shown to promote unhealthy products (e.g. tobacco) to communities of colour( Reference Singh and Lin 4 ). Most public health research on racial/ethnic-targeted food marketing has focused primarily on Black and Latino communities, showing disproportionate promotion of high-energy and low-nutrient foods to these groups( Reference Grier and Kumanyika 9 , Reference Yancey, Cole and Brown 10 ), despite industry leaders’ recognition that Asian-American communities represent a critical growth sector across all industries( 11 ). Additionally, research on tobacco point-of-sale advertising shows that placing ads where the product can be purchased influences access to products, experimentation with products and increases the likelihood of future purchases( 12 , Reference Donovan, Jancey and Jones 13 ).
Given Asian Americans are the fastest growing minority group in the USA, increasing in size by 43·3 % between 2000 and 2010( Reference Hoeffel, Rastogi and Kim 14 ) and are expected to comprise 9·0 % of the total US population by 2050( Reference Passel and Cohn 15 ), more research is needed to assess factors that can negatively influence the dietary choices of Asian Americans. The current study aimed to: (i) quantify the number and type of ads located in a Chinese-American neighbourhood in New York City; and (ii) catalogue the targeted marketing themes used in the food/beverage ads (e.g. language).
Methods
Researchers developed a qualitative codebook based on content analysis guidelines described by Lombard and colleagues( Reference Lombard, Snyder-Duch and Bracken 16 ). The ten-item codebook was based on a similar tool( Reference Bragg, Liu and Roberto 17 ) and addressed the following factors: type of product advertised (e.g. movies, foods/beverages); type of food/beverage (e.g. pizza); location of the ad (e.g. billboard, front-of-store display); street name where the ad was seen; cultural relevance of beverage (e.g. pearl tea (Asian) v. Coca-Cola (generic)); company that advertised the product (e.g. Coca-Cola); individual featured in the ad (e.g. character holding product); use of imagery that targeted children (e.g. cartoon characters); relevance to Asian culture (e.g. Asian flags); and relevance to any Asian language.
Food products were coded using the following categories: candy/dessert (e.g. cake); sauce/snack/processed/grocery store items (e.g. granola bars); fruits; vegetables; away-from-home fast food (e.g. Subway; street food vendor); and away-from-home restaurant (e.g. Denny’s; P.F. Chang’s China Bistro). Food/beverage ads were categorized based on the type of product rather than the type of food/beverage brand. ‘Non-dessert fast food’ refers to food (e.g. burgers, fries) purchased in carry-out eating establishments without wait service( Reference French, Harnack and Jeffery 18 ) while dessert items from fast-food venues were included in the ‘dessert’ category. The distinction between fast food and desserts was made to fully characterize these categories and to prevent the dessert category from being overlooked by or subsumed under ‘fast food’. ‘Restaurants’ refers to establishments where staff members service customers at their tables. This distinction between fast-food venues and restaurants was made because research suggests that consumption of fast food, but not restaurant food, is positively associated with negative health outcomes( Reference Duffey, Gordon-Larsen and Jacobs 19 , Reference Duffey, Gordon-Larsen and Steffen 20 ). Researchers looked through the window and noted whether the venue was a restaurant (i.e. table service) or fast-food establishment (i.e. counter service).
All ads were coded once unless more than one type of food or beverage product was featured in the same ad (i.e. an ad with soda and fries was coded to acknowledge both products). Beverages were coded into these categories: yoghurt drinks, teas, sodas, bubble/pearl teas, energy drinks, canned drinks, fruit beverages (e.g. smoothies), coconut milk/water, brewed tea, ethnic beverage (e.g. plum drink), alcohol, coffee and milk.
The Social Explorer Demographic Research Tool was used to find New York City neighbourhoods where more than 60·0 % of residents identify as Asian/Asian American. A 0·6 mile2 (1·6 km2) area where 85·0 % of residents identify as Chinese/Chinese American met this criterion and was selected as the data collection site. Ten pairs of research assistants visited thirty streets in this area during July 2015 and photographed every outdoor ad including signs, front-of-store displays and billboards, and excluding graffiti. Because the study was observational and research assistants did not enter any of the stores, storeowners were not alerted about data collection beforehand.
Research assistants were trained to use the codebook with pilot images not associated with the collected data. Ten per cent (10·0 %) of the photographs were randomly chosen and coded, and researchers assessed intercoder reliability, requiring a Krippendorf’s α value of at least 0·7 or percentage agreement of 90·0 %( Reference Lombard, Snyder-Duch and Bracken 16 ). After establishing reliability and excluding variables that were associated with unreliable coding results, the remaining 90·0 % of photos were then coded. Each ad was coded once, unless a duplicate ad was photographed at a different location. Finally, the entire data set was analysed using the statistical software package IBM SPSS Statistics version 23.0, and frequencies were run to determine the percentage of ads associated with various codebook items.
Results
Researchers photographed 1366 ads in the designated neighbourhood. Based on the results of inter-rater reliability assessments, all variables met the cut-off for Krippendorf’s α and percentage of agreement and were included in the final analyses.
In the current study, most ads appeared as signs (53·5 %, n 731; e.g. sidewalk chalkboard) or front-of-store displays (35·7 %, n 488; e.g. deli window ad). Ad prevalence was calculated to demonstrate the percentage of each ad type in this area (Table 1). The sample included food ads (n 183), beverage ads (n 181), and food and beverage ads (n 43), making the total 407 food and beverage ads. Thirty per cent (29·7 %, n 407) of ads in the sample featured food and/or beverage products (Table 1), while ‘services’ (e.g. bus ads) were the second largest category (21·0 %, n 288). Ads featured Asian and English text (n 559, 40·9 %) and English text (n 557, 40·8 %) most frequently in comparison to ads written in Asian text (n 209, 15·3 %), English and non-Asian text (n 8, 0·6 %) and non-Asian/non-English text (e.g. Spanish; n 5, 0·4 %).
Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) are drinks that contain added caloric sweeteners (e.g. sucrose) and include regular sodas, fruit drinks, sports drinks, sweetened teas and pre-mixed sweetened coffees( 21 ). This beverage ad type accounted for 66·9 % (n 113) of all beverage ads. The three largest beverage categories included bubble/pearl teas (28·2 % of beverage ads, n 51), alcoholic beverages (26·5 % of food/beverage ads, n 48) and sodas (12·7 % of beverage ads, n 23; Table 2).
SSB, sugar-sweetened beverage.
* Aloe drinks, plum drinks and jelly drinks with unclear nutrition information.
† Added sugar content for three of eleven beverages was unavailable and they were not included in the SSB count.
‡ Seven beverage products did not feature any text.
§ Forty-three ads featured food and beverage products.
║ Total number of beverage ads was calculated by adding beverage only and food and beverage only ads.
¶ Ten ads featuring a food and beverage product were coded as ‘Unknown‘ because they featured a generic cup that was also opaque.
** Some ads showed more than one beverage. As a result, the number of beverage products exceeds the number of beverage ads.
Fast food accounted for 42·5 % (n 89) of the food ads (Table 3), followed by candy/desserts (24·8 %, n 52) and sauce/snack/processed/grocery store items (14·8 %, n 31). Additionally, there were slightly more ads for non-Asian foods/beverages (n 210, 51·6 %) than Asian foods/beverages (n 201, 49·4 %).
* Only two ads coded as ‘dessert‘ were from non-dessert food companies.
† Some ads showed more than one food product.
‡ Forty-three ads featured food and beverage products.
Over half of food/beverage ads (54·9 %, n 200) were relevant to Chinese culture (e.g. Asian model). Fifty-one per cent (51·1 %, n 186) of food/beverage ads used English text only, while 36·0 % used both Chinese text and English, and 8·2 % used Chinese text only. Fifty-nine per cent (58·6 %) of food/beverage ads were for products sold by small companies (i.e. fewer than twenty chain restaurants), while 21·9 % of ads were for a major multinational company (e.g. McDonald’s). Only 8·2 % of food/beverage ads were child-targeted.
Discussion
Findings from the current study reflect previous research results showing that outdoor ads promote unhealthy food/beverage products more often than healthy products, which may contribute to obesogenic food environments( Reference Seiders and Petty 7 ). Food/beverages were the largest category (26·6 %) of ads in the sample and the prominence of SSB ads (66·9 % of beverage ads) in this area is alarming given the high rates of diabetes in some Asian subgroups. In fact, a large study of outdoor ads targeting White, Latino and Black neighbourhoods reported that SSB ads made up just 4·1 % of ads in zip codes from four major cities (Austin, TX; Los Angeles, CA; New York, NY; Philadelphia, PA)( Reference Yancey, Cole and Brown 10 ), whereas SSB ads made up 8·7 % of ads in this sample.
The current findings also suggest a need to tailor policies and interventions to address unique products that may contribute to poor health outcomes. Several major food/beverage companies in this sample used elements of Asian culture to appeal to Asian consumers. Further, the majority of ads promoted food products from small businesses (58·6 %) compared with national mainstream brands (21·9 %), highlighting a need to engage small businesses in advancing patron-level healthy living initiatives (e.g. energy labelling). The targeted nature of the food/beverage ads in our sample demonstrates companies’ ability to tailor ads to specific ethnic groups based on their prevalence in particular neighbourhoods, which can be a public health asset when ads promote health (e.g. health insurance) or a liability (e.g. SSB ads).
The high prevalence of ads (n 1366) in this 0·60 mile2 (1·55 km2) area in New York City is concerning because 29·7 % of ads featured foods or beverages. Given research showing the negative effects of food ad exposure on eating behaviours( Reference Cairns, Angus and Hastings 22 ) and that obesity prevalence ranges from 2·4 to 47·0 % among Chinese Americans in the USA( 3 ), there is a need for policies to promote healthier lifestyle choices. Tailored policies are particularly important for Asian-American communities because their obesity rates vary widely. For instance, the obesity rate for third-generation (i.e. US-born parents and children) Chinese Americans is 22·1 % compared with 2·6 % for first-generation (i.e. foreign-born parents and children) Chinese Americans( Reference Bates, Acevedo-Garcia and Alegría 23 ). This difference reinforces the environment’s impactful role in contributing to unhealthy dietary behaviours.
In the current study, ad prevalence varied by street, where some featured no ads while others featured over 100 ads. Other studies show that outdoor food ads were clustered in Black communities( Reference Hillier, Cole and Smith 24 ) and unhealthy food ads in subway stations were clustered more heavily in neighbourhoods with higher poverty rates and Latino residents( Reference Lucan, Maroko and Sanon 25 ). These findings suggest communities of colour face high levels of food ad exposure, but we did not collect data on the types of surrounding venues in our study and cannot report whether the distribution of ads on these streets might cluster in ways that expose certain populations to more ads. Still, identifying culturally relevant food ads is important because research shows that various marketing strategies act as environmental cues, triggering consumers to make unplanned purchases and increase consumption of unhealthy food/beverage products( Reference Pasch, Komro and Perry 26 , Reference Moodie, Stuckler and Monteiro 27 ). Alternatively, research shows that health promotion efforts (e.g. food labels) do not significantly reduce consumption( Reference Sharma, Teret and Brownell 28 - Reference Harnack, French and Oakes 30 ) yet high demand for unhealthy products remains, driving heavy promotion by food/beverage companies( Reference Polin 31 ). Additionally, advertising is protected under the First Amendment, preventing restriction of its messages, ideas, subject matter or content( Reference Polin 31 ), which limits consumers’ ability to avoid unhealthy ads. Because these protections also prevent zoning restrictions on advertising, our findings could instead be utilized by community organizations and government agencies when developing counter-advertising campaigns (e.g. ‘Pouring on the Pounds’)( 32 ), which should include ethnically relevant foods/beverages (e.g. bubble tea).
Limitations
The current study is limited by the small scale of the 0·60 mile2 (1·55 km2) area of focus as well as the focus on one neighbourhood, which prohibits our ability to compare the extent of targeted marketing across demographic groups. However, the present study is the first, to our knowledge, to systematically assess food/beverage ads in neighbourhoods where residents are predominantly Chinese American and where ads target a variety of Asian ethnic subgroups. Findings suggest a need for policies and interventions to address the unique food/beverage products and advertising techniques that may negatively contribute to health in Asian-American communities.
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank the following NYU SeedProgram Research Assistants for their assistance with coding the data and preparing the manuscript: Alysa Miller, Margaret Eby, Natasha Pandit, Joshua Arshonsky, Alexia Akbay, Tiffany Cheng, Carolyn Fan and Eleni Papaiacovou-Lane. Financial support: This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of the Director (OD; grant number DP5OD021373-01); the NIH National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD; grant number P60MD000538); and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC; grant number U58DP005621). The NIH/OD, NIH/NIMHD and CDC had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article. Conflict of interest: None. Authorship: M.A.B. originated the idea for the manuscript and reviewed relevant literature on the topic. Y.K.P. assisted with data collection and analysis and helped with the development of the manuscript. O.H.-V. assisted with data collection and helped with the development of the manuscript. S.A.K. provided critical feedback on drafts of the manuscript and assisted in framing the issues. S.C.K. provided critical feedback on drafts of the manuscript and assisted in framing the issues. Ethics of human subject participation: This study did not involve human subjects and thus did not require institutional review board approval.