Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T14:35:09.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of dietary habits among women in Japan and Hawaii

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Yumie Takata
Affiliation:
Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, 1236 Lauhala Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
Gertraud Maskarinec*
Affiliation:
Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, 1236 Lauhala Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
Adrian Franke
Affiliation:
Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, 1236 Lauhala Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
Chisato Nagata
Affiliation:
Gifu University School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
Hiroyuki Shimizu
Affiliation:
Gifu University School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To compare the dietary habits of Japanese women in Japan with those of Japanese and Caucasian women living in Hawaii.

Design:

Data from two previous cross-sectional studies conducted within two years in Hawaii and Gifu, Japan were pooled and analysed. Dietary intakes were assessed with validated food-frequency questionnaires and urine samples were collected for isoflavone measurement.

Setting:

Participants were recruited through mammography clinics in both locations.

Subjects:

In Hawaii, 164 Caucasian and 146 Japanese women; in Japan, 206 women.

Results:

Dietary habits differed considerably by ethnicity and location. In comparison to the Caucasian diet, the diet in Japan was relatively low in fat and high in carbohydrates and protein, whereas the Japanese women in Hawaii reported intermediate intakes. Japanese women in Gifu consumed a diet that was relatively high in fish, soy, eggs and vegetables, and low in fruits, dairy products and meat. In contrast, the Caucasian women consumed the most dairy products and fruits and the Japanese women in Hawaii reported the highest grain and meat intakes.

Conclusions:

The diet of Japanese women in Hawaii appeared to be a combination of foods eaten in Japan and the dietary habits of Caucasian women in Hawaii, but eating habits in Japan are also different from traditional nutritional patterns. This study illustrates several problems related to dietary comparisons across populations and provides information for future investigations on chronic disease risk.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © CAB International 2004

References

1Ferlay, J, Bray, F, Pisani, P, Parkin, DM. GLOBOCAN 2000: Cancer Incidence Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) CancerBase No. 5. Lyon: IARC Press, 2001.Google Scholar
2Willett, W. Nutritional Epidemiology, New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Kolonel, LN. Variability in diet and its relation to risk in ethnic and migrant groups. Basic Life Sciences 1988; 43: 129–35.Google ScholarPubMed
4World Cancer Research Fund. Food, Nutrition and The Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: American Institute for Cancer Research, 1997.Google Scholar
5Landman, J, Cruickshank, JK. A review of ethnicity, health and nutrition-related diseases in relation to migration in the United Kingdom. Public Health Nutrition 2001; 4: 647–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Le Marchand, L, Wilkens, LR, Hankin, JH, Kolonel, LN, Lyu, LC. A case–control study of diet and colorectal cancer in a multiethnic population in Hawaii (United States): lipids and foods of animal origin. Cancer Causes & Control 1997; 8: 637–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Le Marchand, L, Hankin, JH, Pierce, LM, Sinha, R, Nerurkar, PV, Franke, AA, et al. Well-done red meat, metabolic phenotypes and colorectal cancer in Hawaii. Mutation Research 2002; 506–507: 205–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Yano, K, Reed, DM, Kagan, A. Coronary heart disease, hypertension and stroke among Japanese-American men in Hawaii: the Honolulu Heart Program. Hawaii Medical Journal 1985; 44: 297321.Google ScholarPubMed
9McGee, DL, Reed, DM, Yano, K, Kagan, A, Tillotson, J. Ten-year incidence of coronary heart disease in the Honolulu Heart Program. Relationship to nutrient intake. American Journal of Epidemiology 1984; 119: 667–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Satia-Abouta, J, Patterson, RE, Neuhouser, ML, Elder, J. Dietary acculturation: applications to nutrition research and dietetics. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2002; 102: 1105–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Huang, B, Rodriguez, BL, Burchfiel, CM, Chyou, PH, Curb, JD, Yano, K. Acculturation and prevalence of diabetes among Japanese-American men in Hawaii. American Journal of Epidemiology 1996; 144: 674–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Kudo, Y, Falciglia, GA, Couch, SC. Evolution of meal patterns and food choices of Japanese-American females born in the United States. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 54: 665–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Kida, K, Ito, T, Yang, SW, Tanphaichitr, V. Effects of Western diet on risk factors of chronic diseases in Asia. In: Bendich, A, Deckelbaum, RJ. eds. Preventive Nutrition: The Comprehensive Guide for Health Professionals. Totowa, NJ: Human Press Inc., 2001; 435–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Tominaga, S, Kuroishi, T. An ecological study on diet/nutrition and cancer in Japan. International Journal of Cancer. 1997; (Suppl. 10): 26.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Maskarinec, G, Meng, L, Ursin, G. Ethnic differences in mammographic densities. International Journal of Epidemiology 2001; 30: 959–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Maskarinec, G, Nagata, C, Shimizu, H, Kashiki, Y. Comparison of mammographic densities and their determinants in women from Japan and Hawaii. International Journal of Cancer 2002; 102: 2933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Shimizu, H, Ohwaki, A, Kurisu, Y, Takatsuka, N, Ido, M, Kawakami, N, et al. Validity and reproducibility of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire for a cohort study in Japan. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 1999; 29: 3844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Stram, DO, Hankin, JH, Wilkens, LR, Henderson, B, Kolonel, LN. Calibration of the dietary questionnaire for a multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles. American Journal of Epidemiology 2000; 151: 358–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Maskarinec, G, Singh, S, Meng, L, Franke, AA. Dietary soy intake and urinary isoflavone excretion among women from a multiethnic population. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 1998; 7: 613–19.Google ScholarPubMed
20United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). United States Department of Agriculture Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Riverdale, MD: USDA, 1993.Google Scholar
21Committee on Resources, Science Bureau of Japan. Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan. Tokyo: Printing Office, Ministry of Finance, 1983.Google Scholar
22Franke, AA, Hankin, JH, Yu, MC, Maskarinec, G, Low, SH, Custer, LJ. Isoflavone levels in soy foods consumed by multiethnic populations in Singapore and Hawaii. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1999; 47: 977–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Wakai, K, Egami, I, Kato, K, Kawamura, T, Tamakoshi, A, Lin, Y, et al. Dietary intake and sources of isoflavones among Japanese. Nutrition and Cancer 1999; 33: 139–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Seow, A, Shi, CH, Franke, AA, Hankin, H, Lee, HP, Yu, MC. Isoflavonoid levels in spot urine predict frequency of dietary soy intake in a population-based sample of middle-aged Chinese in Singapore. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 1998; 7: 135–40.Google Scholar
25Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization (WHO)/United Nations University. Energy and Protein Requirements. Report of a Joint Expert Consultation. Technical Report Series No. 724. Geneva: WHO, 1985.Google Scholar
26Goldberg, GR, Black, AE, Jebb, SA, Cole, TJ, Murgatroyd, PR, Coward, WA, et al. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1991; 45: 569–81.Google ScholarPubMed
27Black, AE. Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake:basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 2000; 24: 1119–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Merrill, AL, Watt, BK. Agriculture Handbook No. 74, Energy Value of Foods. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1973.Google Scholar
29SAS, Institute. SAS OnlineDoc®, Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 2002.Google Scholar
30US Department of Agriculture, US Department of Health and Human Services. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Pueblo, CO: Consumer Information Center, 2000.Google Scholar
31Kolonel, LN, Henderson, BE, Hankin, JH, Nomura, AMY, Wilkens, LR, Pike, MC, et al. A multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: baseline characteristics. American Journal of Epidemiology 2000; 151: 346–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Huang, MH, Schocken, M, Block, G, Sowers, M, Gold, E, Sternfeld, B, et al. Variation in nutrient intakes by ethnicity: results from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Menopause 2002; 9: 309–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Shimizu, H. A Basic Report on Takayama Study. Gifu: Department of Public Health, University School of Medicine, 1996.Google Scholar
34Wilkinson, CE, Goldman, JD, Cook, A. Trends in food and nutrient intakes by adults: NFCS 1977–78, CSFII 1989–91, and CSFII 1994–95. Family Economics and Nutrition Review 1997; 10: 215.Google Scholar
35Freire, RD, Cardoso, MA, Shinzato, AR, Ferreira, SR. Nutritional status of Japanese-Brazilian subjects: comparison across gender and generation. British Journal of Nutrition 2003; 89: 705–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36Anon. Nutritional Trends in Japan after World War 2. Tokyo: Daiichi Shuppan, 1998.Google Scholar
37Subar, AF, Krebs-Smith, SM, Cook, A, Kahle, LL. Dietary sources of nutrients among US adults, 1989 to 1991. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1998; 98: 537–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Kimira, M, Nakatani, Y, Takahashi, T, Iidoi, Y, Iwase, Y, Kuriki, T, et al. Research in methods used in health and nutrition evaluation of community nutrition planning [abstract]. Japanese Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics 2002; 60(Suppl. 5): 294.Google Scholar
39Chessler, SD, Fujimoto, WY, Shofer, JB, Boyko, EJ, Weigle, DS. Increased plasma leptin levels are associated with fat accumulation in Japanese Americans. Diabetes 1998; 47: 239–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. The National Nutrition Survey in Japan, 2000. Tokyo: Daiichi Shuppan, 2002.Google Scholar
41Shu, XO, Jin, F, Dai, Q, Wen, W, Potter, JD, Kushi, LH, et al. Soyfood intake during adolescence and subsequent risk of breast cancer among Chinese women. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 2001; 10: 483–8.Google ScholarPubMed
42Wu, AH, Wan, P, Hankin, J, Tseng, CC, Yu, MC, Pike, MC. Adolescent and adult soy intake and risk of breast cancer in Asian-Americans. Carcinogenesis 2002; 23: 1491–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Deharveng, G, Charrondiere, UR, Slimani, N, Southgate, DA, Riboli, E. Comparison of nutrients in the food composition tables available in the nine European countries participating in EPIC. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1999; 53: 6079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Dai, Q, Franke, AA, Jin, F, Shu, XO, Hebert, JR, Custer, LJ, et al. Urinary excretion of phytoestrogens and risk of breast cancer among Chinese women in Shanghai. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 2002; 11: 815–21.Google ScholarPubMed
45Kono, S, Ahn, YO. Vegetables, cereals and colon cancer mortality: long-term trend in Japan. European Journal of Cancer Prevention 2000; 9: 363–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46Whittemore, AS, Kolonel, LN, Wu, AH, John, EM, Gallagher, RP, Howe, GR, et al. Prostate cancer in relation to diet, physical activity, and body size in blacks, whites, and Asians in the United States and Canada. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1995; 87: 652–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar