Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T10:20:26.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Benefits and barriers to the consumption of a vegetarian diet in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2006

Emma Lea  and
Anthony Worsley
Emma Lea*
Affiliation:
School of Health Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia
Anthony Worsley
Affiliation:
School of Health Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

The aim of this study was to examine consumers' perceived benefits and barriers to the consumption of a vegetarian diet.

Design:

Survey (written questionnaire) that included questions on perceived benefits and barriers to the consumption of a vegetarian diet.

Setting:

South Australia.

Subjects:

Six hundred and one randomly selected South Australians.

Results:

The main perceived barriers to adopting a vegetarian diet were enjoying eating meat and an unwillingness to alter eating habits. This was the case for men, women and all age groups, although there were sex and age differences present in over half of the barrier items. For example, family food preferences were a greater problem for women than for men, while the oldest group was more likely to agree that humans are ‘meant’ to eat meat than the younger groups. The main benefits associated with vegetarian diets were health benefits: increased fruit and vegetable intake, decreased saturated fat intake, weight control. Animal welfare-related benefits and disease prevention were also important. Age and sex differences were apparent, although age differences were more important than sex differences.

Conclusions:

The majority of respondents perceived there to be health benefits associated with the consumption of a vegetarian diet, but also, predictably, enjoyed eating meat. Given this, it is likely that interest in plant-based diets that contain some meat is higher than that in no-meat diets. An understanding of the perceived benefits and barriers of consuming a vegetarian diet will allow the implementation of strategies to influence meat and vegetarianism beliefs, dietary behaviour and, hence, public health.

Keywords

BeliefsBenefitsBarriersMeatVegetarianPlant-based dietsHealthSurveyAustralia
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 6 , Issue 5 , August 2003 , pp. 505 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2003

References

1Adams, CJ. The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist–Vegetarian Critical Theory. New York: Continuum, 1990.Google Scholar
2Fiddes, N. Social aspects of meat eating. Proceedings of The Nutrition Society 1994; 53: 271–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Maurer, D. Vegetarianism: Movement or Moment? Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
4American Dietetic Association. How many vegetarians are there?. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1997; 97(11): 1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Gallup. The Realeat Survey 1997 – Changing Attitudes to Meat Consumption. Newport Pagnell, UK: Haldane Foods, 1997.Google Scholar
6Vegetarian Resource Group. How Many Vegetarians Are There? A 2000 National Zogby Poll [online]. Available at: http://www.vrg.org. Accessed 31 March 2000.Google Scholar
7Vegetarian Society UK. Summary of RealEat Polls 1984–1999 [online]. Available at: http://www.vegsoc.org/info/realeat.html. Accessed 9 April 2001.Google Scholar
8Pimentel, D, Houser, J, Preiss, E, White, O. Water resources: agriculture, the environment, and society. Bioscience 1997; 47(2): 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Spedding, CRW. The effect of dietary changes on agriculture. In: Lewis, B, Assmann, G, eds. The Social and Economic Contexts of Coronary Prevention. London: Current Medical Literature, 1990.Google Scholar
10American Dietetic Association. Position of the American Dietetic Association: vegetarian diets. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1997; 97(11): 1317–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Bingham, SA. High-meat diets and cancer risk. Proceedings of The Nutrition Society 1999; 58: 243–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Key, TJ, Davey, GK, Appleby, PN. Health benefits of a vegetarian diet. Proceedings of The Nutrition Society 1999; 58: 271–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Key, TJ, Fraser, GE, Thorogood, M, Appleby, PN, Beral, V, Reeves, G, et al. Mortality in vegetarians and nonvegetarians: detailed findings from a collaborative analysis of 5 prospective studies. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1999; 70(Suppl.): S516–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Potter, JD. Your mother was right: eat your vegetables. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 9(Suppl.1): S10–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Healthy People 2010 – Conference Edition. Washington, DC: US DHHS, 2000.Google Scholar
16World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR). Food, Nutrition and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: AICR, 1997.Google Scholar
17Balch, GI, Loughrey, K, Weinberg, L, Lurie, D, Eisner, E. Probing consumer benefits and barriers for the national 5 A Day campaign: focus group findings. Journal of Nutrition Education 1997; 29: 178–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Cox, DN, Anderson, AS, Lean, MEJ, Mela, DJ. UK consumer attitudes, beliefs and barriers to increasing fruit and vegetable consumption. Public Health Nutrition 1998; 1(1): 61–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Lappalainen, R, Saba, A, Holm, L, Mykkanen, H, Gibney, MJ. Difficulties in trying to eat healthier: descriptive analysis of perceived barriers for healthy eating. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1997; 51(Suppl. 2): S36–40.Google ScholarPubMed
20Lloyd, HM, Paisley, CM, Mela, DJM. Barriers to the adoption of reduced-fat diets in a UK Population. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1995; 95(3): 316–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21McDonell, GE, Roberts, DCK, Lee, C. Stages of change and reduction of dietary fat: effect of knowledge and attitudes in an Australian university population. Journal of Nutrition Education 1998; 30: 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Sparks, P, Guthrie, CA, Shepherd, R. The dimensional structure of the perceived behavioral control construct. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1997; 27(5): 418–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Zunft, HJF, Friebe, D, Seppelt, B, de Graaf, C, Margetts, B, Schmitt, A, et al. Perceived benefits of healthy eating among a nationally-representative sample of adults in the European Union. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1997; 51(Suppl. 2): S41–6.Google ScholarPubMed
24Kalof, L, Dietz, T, Stern, PC, Guagnano, GA. Social psychological and structural influences on vegetarian beliefs. Rural Sociology 1999; 64(3): 500–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Dietz, T, Guagnano, GA, Stern, PC. US National Telephone Survey on Environmental Values. Fairfax, VA: Northern Virginia Survey Research Laboratory, George Mason University, 1994.Google Scholar
26McIntosh, WA, Kubena, KS, Jiang, H, Usery, CP, Karnei, K. An application of the Health Belief Model to reductions in fat and cholesterol intake. Journal of Wellness Perspectives 1996; 12(2): 98–107.Google Scholar
27Nestle, M, Wing, R, Birch, L, DiSogra, L, Drewnowski, A, Middleton, S, et al. Behavioral and social influences on food choice. Nutrition Reviews 1998; 56(5): S50–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Rosenstock, IM. Historical origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Education Monographs 1974; 2(4): 328–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Wolinsky, FD. The Sociology of Health: Principles, Professions and Issues. Boston, MA: Little/Brown, 1980.Google Scholar
30Prochaska, JO, DiClemente, CC, Norcross, JC. In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviors. The American Psychologist 1992; 47(9): 1102–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Prochaska, JO, Velicer, WF, Rossi, JS, Goldstein, MG, Marcus, BH, Rakowski, W, et al. Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychology 1994; 13(1): 39–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Horwath, CC. Applying the transtheoretical model to eating behaviour change: challenges and opportunities. Nutrition Research Reviews 1999; 12: 281–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Beard, L, Wyllie, A, Caswell, S. Towards Understanding Eating Habits in New Zealand: A Qualitative Investigation. Auckland: Department of Community Health, University of Auckland, 1989.Google Scholar
34Kearney, M, Gibney, MJ, Martinez, JA, de Almeida, MDV, Friebe, D, Zunft, HJF, et al. Perceived need to alter eating habits among representative samples of adults from all member states of the European Union. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1997; 51(Suppl. 2): S30–5.Google ScholarPubMed
35Kearney, JM, McElhone, S. Perceived barriers in trying to eat healthier – results of a pan-EU consumer attitudinal survey. British Journal of Nutrition 1999; 81(Suppl. 2): S133–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36Twigg, J. Vegetarianism and the meanings of meat. In: Murcott, A, ed. The Sociology of Food and Eating: Essays on the Social Significance of Food. Aldershot, UK: Gower, 1983; 18–30.Google Scholar
37Lea, E, Worsley, A. Influences on meat consumption in Australia. Appetite 2001; 36(2): 127–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Lea, E, Worsley, A. The cognitive contexts of beliefs about the healthiness of meat. Public Health Nutrition 2002; 5(1): 37–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39Hair, JF, Anderson, RE, Tatham, RL, Black, WC. Multivariate Data Analysis, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1995.Google Scholar
40Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 1996 Census of Population and Housing. Basic Community Profile Software. Canberra: ABS, 1996.Google Scholar
41Crawford, DA, Baghurst, KI. Diet and health: a national survey of beliefs, behaviours and barriers to change in the community. Australian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics 1990; 47(4): 97–104.Google Scholar
42Rozin, P, Markwith, M, Stoess, C. Moralization and becoming a vegetarian: the transformation of preferences into values and the recruitment of disgust. Psychological Science 1997; 8(2): 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43Lewis, S. An opinion on the global impact of meat consumption. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1994; 59(Suppl.): S1099–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Bilderbeck, N, Holdsworth, MD, Purves, R, Davies, L. Changing food habits among 100 elderly men and women in the United Kingdom. Journal of Human Nutrition 1981; 35(6): 448–55.Google ScholarPubMed
45Sjogren, A, Osterberg, T, Steen, B. Intake of energy, nutrients and food items in a ten-year cohort comparison and in a six-year longitudinal perspective: a population study of 70- and 76-year-old Swedish people. Age and Ageing 1994; 23(2): 108–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46Drewnoski, A, Henderson, SA, Driscoll, A, Rolls, BJ. The Dietary Variety Score: assessing diet quality in healthy young and older adults. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1997; 97(3): 266–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47Mann, JI. Optimizing the plant-based diet. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 9(Suppl. 1): S60–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48Baghurst, K. Red meat consumption in Australia: intakes, contributions to nutrient intake and associated dietary patterns. European Journal of Cancer Prevention 1999; 8: 185–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed