Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Wexler, Mark
Kosslyn, Stephen M
and
Berthoz, Alain
1998.
Motor processes in mental rotation.
Cognition,
Vol. 68,
Issue. 1,
p.
77.
Rapoport, Stanley I.
1999.
How did the human brain evolve? a proposal based on new evidence from in vivo brain imaging during attention and ideation.
Brain Research Bulletin,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 3,
p.
149.
Kosslyn, S. M.
Pascual-Leone, A.
Felician, O.
Camposano, S.
Keenan, J. P.
L., W.
Thompson
Ganis, G.
Sukel, K. E.
and
Alpert, N. M.
1999.
The Role of Area 17 in Visual Imagery: Convergent Evidence from PET and rTMS.
Science,
Vol. 284,
Issue. 5411,
p.
167.
Wraga, Maryjane
Creem, Sarah H.
and
Proffitt, Dennis R.
1999.
The influence of spatial reference frames on imagined object- and viewer rotations.
Acta Psychologica,
Vol. 102,
Issue. 2-3,
p.
247.
Karádi, Kázmér
Szabó, Imre
Szepesi, Tímea
Kállai, Ján Os
and
Kovács, Beatrix
1999.
Sex Differences on the Hand Mental Rotation Task for 9-Yr.-Old Children and Young Adults.
Perceptual and Motor Skills,
Vol. 89,
Issue. 3,
p.
969.
Dehaene, S.
Spelke, E.
Pinel, P.
Stanescu, R.
and
Tsivkin, S.
1999.
Sources of Mathematical Thinking: Behavioral and Brain-Imaging Evidence.
Science,
Vol. 284,
Issue. 5416,
p.
970.
Karádi, Kázmér
Szabó, Imre
Szepesi, Tímea
Kállai, Ján Os
and
Kovács, Beatrix
1999.
Sex Differences on the Hand Mental Rotation Task for 9-Yr.-Old Children and Young Adults.
Perceptual and Motor Skills,
Vol. 89,
Issue. 3,
p.
969.
Howseman, A.
Zeki, S.
and
Kosslyn, S. M.
1999.
If neuroimaging is the answer, what is the question?.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences,
Vol. 354,
Issue. 1387,
p.
1283.
Harris, Irina M.
Egan, Gary F.
Sonkkila, Cynon
Tochon-Danguy, Henri J.
Paxinos, George
and
Watson, John D. G.
2000.
Selective right parietal lobe activation during mental rotation.
Brain,
Vol. 123,
Issue. 1,
p.
65.
Thompson, William L.
and
Kosslyn, Stephen M.
2000.
Brain Mapping: The Systems.
p.
535.
Backs, Richard W.
2000.
Application of Psychophysiological Models to Mental Workload.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 21,
p.
3-464.
Sekiyama, Kaoru
Miyauchi, Satoru
Imaruoka, Toshihide
Egusa, Hiroyuki
and
Tashiro, Takara
2000.
Body image as a visuomotor transformation device revealed in adaptation to reversed vision.
Nature,
Vol. 407,
Issue. 6802,
p.
374.
Buxbaum, Laurel J.
Giovannetti, Tania
and
Libon, David
2000.
The Role of the Dynamic Body Schema in Praxis: Evidence from Primary Progressive Apraxia.
Brain and Cognition,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 2,
p.
166.
Duffau, Hugues
Capelle, Laurent
Lopes, Manuel
Faillot, Thierry
Sichez, Jean-Pierre
and
Fohanno, Denis
2000.
The Insular Lobe: Physiopathological and Surgical Considerations.
Neurosurgery,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 4,
p.
801.
Thayer, Zoe C.
Johnson, Blake W.
Corballis, Michael C.
and
Hamm, Jeff P.
2001.
Perceptual and motor mechanisms for mental rotation of human hands.
Neuroreport,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 16,
p.
3433.
Jordan, K.
Heinze, H.-J.
Lutz, K.
Kanowski, M.
and
Jäncke, L.
2001.
Cortical Activations during the Mental Rotation of Different Visual Objects.
NeuroImage,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
143.
Karádi, Kázmér
Kovács, Beatrix
Szepesi, Tímea
Szabó, Imre
and
Kállai, János
2001.
Egocentric mental rotation in Hungarian dyslexic children.
Dyslexia,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 1,
p.
3.
Kosslyn, Stephen M.
Thompson, William L.
Wraga, M.
and
Alpert, Nathaniel M.
2001.
Imagining rotation by endogenous versus exogenous forces: Distinct neural mechanisms.
Neuroreport,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 11,
p.
2519.
Mast, Fred W
Berthoz, Alain
and
Kosslyn, Stephen M
2001.
Mental Imagery of Visual Motion Modifies the Perception of Roll-Vection Stimulation.
Perception,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 8,
p.
945.
Lamm, Claus
Bauer, Herbert
Vitouch, Oliver
Durec, Susanne
Gronister, Roswitha
and
Gstättner, Reinhard
2001.
Restriction of task processing time affects cortical activity during processing of a cognitive task: an event-related slow cortical potential study.
Cognitive Brain Research,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 3,
p.
275.