Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:37:08.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mental fatigue and task control: Planning and preparation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2000

MONICQUE M. LORIST
Affiliation:
Experimental and Work Psychology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
MEREL KLEIN
Affiliation:
Experimental and Work Psychology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
SANDER NIEUWENHUIS
Affiliation:
Department of Psychonomics, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
RITSKE DE JONG
Affiliation:
Experimental and Work Psychology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
GIJSBERTUS MULDER
Affiliation:
Experimental and Work Psychology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
THEO F. MEIJMAN
Affiliation:
Experimental and Work Psychology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

The effects of mental fatigue on planning and preparation for future actions were examined, using a task switching paradigm. Fatigue was induced by “time on task,” with subjects performing a switch task continuously for 2 hr. Subjects had to alternate between tasks on every second trial, so that a new task set was required on every second trial. Manipulations of response–stimulus intervals (RSIs) were used to examine whether subjects prepared themselves for the task change. Behavioral measurements, event-related potentials (ERPs), and mood questionnaires were used to assess the effects of mental fatigue. Reaction times (RTs) were faster on trials in which no change in task set was required in comparison with switch trials, requiring a new task set. Long RSIs were used efficiently to prepare for the processing of subsequent stimuli. With increasing mental fatigue, preparation processes seemed to become less adequate and the number of errors increased. A clear poststimulus parietal negativity was observed on repetition trials, which reduced with time on task. This attention-related component was less pronounced in switch trials; instead, ERPs elicited in switch trials showed a clear frontal negativity. This negativity was also diminished by time on task. ERP differences between repetition and switch trials became smaller with increasing time on task.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Society for Psychophysiological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)