Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:07:21.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the reliable assessment of cardiovascular recovery: An application of curve-fitting techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2000

NICHOLAS CHRISTENFELD
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, USA
LAURA M. GLYNN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Irvine, USA
WILLIAM GERIN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Cornell University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA National Institutes of Health, Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
Get access

Abstract

The underuse of cardiovascular recovery as an adjunct to reactivity may stem from a lack of research on how to assess the process reliably. We explore the test–retest reliability of three simple, intuitive approaches to measuring recovery, and of a more sophisticated curve-fitting technique. Eighteen young normotensive subjects experienced three stressors twice each, with 10-min baseline, 3-min task, and 20-min recovery periods and continuous monitoring of heart rate and blood pressure. Reactivity showed moderate reliability, but the three simple approaches to measuring recovery revealed essentially none. However, the curve-fitting approach, using a three-parameter (amount, speed, and level of recovery) logistic function was reliable. This approach, capturing the inherently dynamic process of cardiovascular recovery, may allow researchers to usefully add the assessment of recovery to paradigms exploring reactivity as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2000 Society for Psychophysiological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)