Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:05:31.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EOG correction: Which regression should we use?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2000

RODNEY J. CROFT  and
ROBERT J. BARRY
RODNEY J. CROFT
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Australia
ROBERT J. BARRY
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Electrooculogram (EOG) correction is used to remove eye-movement-related contamination from electroencephalograms (EEG). Correction is reliant on the regression procedure, although when multiple EOG channels are used in the correction, the appropriate type of regression to use is not known. In the present study, we aimed to resolve this matter. Computer simulations were used to compare the simultaneous, multiple-stage, and single-channel regression methods of correction. EOG propagation was modeled on prior findings, under conditions of varying vertical and horizontal EOG (VEOG/HEOG) correlation. The dependent variable was the correlation between the uncontaminated and the corrected EEG. The simultaneous regression procedure gave the best correction, with its advantage increasing as a function of VEOG/HEOG correlation. It is recommended that the simultaneous regression procedure be used for EOG correction of the EEG.

Keywords

EEGEOG correctionRegression methodEOG artifact
Type
BRIEF REPORT
Information
Psychophysiology , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , January 2000 , pp. 123 - 125
Copyright
© 2000 Society for Psychophysiological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)