Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:39:24.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Unifying Expression for the Maximal Reliability of a Linear Composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Heng Li
Heng Li*
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics and Biostatistics, University of Rochester
*
Requests for reprints should be addressed to Heng Li, Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 630, Rochester, NY 14642.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A formally simple expression for the maximal reliability of a linear composite is provided, its theoretical implications and its relation to existing results for reliability are discussed.

Keywords

maximal reliabilityreliabilitySpearman-Brown equation
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 62 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 245 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author would like to thank the editor, an associate editor, and their reviewers for very helpful comments on the earlier drafts of this work. He is indebted to Donald B. Rubin for his continual guidance, and to Robert Rosenthal for man), enlightening discussions. Preparation of this article was partially supported by the National Science Foundation through grant SBR-9207456. Most of this work was completed while the author was with the Department of Statistics at Harvard University.

References

Conger, A. J. (1980). Maximally reliable composites for unidimensional measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 367–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldt, L. S., Brennan, R. L. (1989). Reliability. In Linn, R. L. (Eds.), Educational measurement (pp. 105–146). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristof, W. (1971). On the theory of a set of tests which differ only in length. Psychometrika, 36, 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H., Rosenthal, R., Rubin, D. B. (1996). Reliability of measurement in psychology: From Spearman-Brown to maximal reliability. Psychological Methods, 1, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Mulaik, S. A. (1972). The foundations of factor analysis, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Thomson, G. H. (1940). Weighting for battery reliability and prediction. British Journal of Psychology, 30, 357–366.Google Scholar