Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T09:48:05.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Unified Treatment of the Weighting Problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Roderick P. McDonald
Roderick P. McDonald*
Affiliation:
The University of New England, N. S. W., Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A general procedure is described for obtaining weighted linear combinations of variables. This includes as special cases, multiple regression weights, canonical variate analysis, principal components, maximizing composite reliability, canonical factor analysis, and certain other well-known methods. The general procedure is shown to yield certain desirable invariance properties, with respect to transformations of the variables.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , September 1968 , pp. 351 - 381
Copyright
Copyright © 1968 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author wishes to thank Dr. A. J. Cropley for preparing the necessary computer programs for this study.

References

Anderson, T. W. Introduction to multivariate statistical analysis, New York: John Wiley, 1958.Google Scholar
Edgerton, H. A. and Kolbe, L. E. The method of minimum variation for the combination of criteria. Psychometrika, 1936, 1, 183–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. The precision of discriminant functions. Annals of Eugenics, 1940, 10, 422–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, B. F. A note on the calculation of weights for maximum battery reliability. Psychometrika, 1950, 15, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulliksen, H. Theory of mental tests, New York: John Wiley, 1950.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. In Horst, P. (Ed.) The prediction of personal adjustment. Social Science Research Council, 1941.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. Image theory for the structure of quantitative variates. Psychometrika, 1953, 18, 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. Some necessary conditions for common factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1954, 19, 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. “Best possible” systematic estimates of communalities. Psychometrika, 1956, 21, 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, H. H. Modern factor analysis. Univ. of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Harris, C. W. Some Rao-Guttman relationships. Psychometrika, 1962, 27, 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horst, P. Obtaining a composite measure from a number of different measures of the same attribute. Psychometrika, 1936, 1, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horst, P. Relations amongm sets of variables. Psychometrika, 1961, 26, 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotelling, H. The most predictable criterion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1935, 26, 139–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K. Statistical estimation in factor analysis, Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell, 1963.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G. and Stuart, A. The advanced theory of statistics, London: Griffin, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, H. O. The structure of bivariate distributions. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1958, 29, 719–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawley, D. N. A modified method of estimation in factor analysis and some large sample results. In Uppsala symposium on psychological factor analysis. Nordisk Psykologi's Monogr. Ser. No. 3, 1953.Google Scholar
Lord, F. M. Some relations between Guttman's principal components of scale analysis and other psychometric theory. Psychometrika, 1958, 23, 291–296.Google Scholar
Mosier, C. J. On the reliability of a weighted composite. Psychometrika, 1943, 8, 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, E. A. Prediction of a complex criterion and battery reliability. British Journal of Psychology, Statistical Section, 1948, 1, 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, C. R. Estimation and tests of significance in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1955, 20, 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, G. H. Weighting for battery reliability and prediction. British Journal of Psychology, 1940, 30, 357–366.Google Scholar
Whittle, P. On principal components and least square methods of factor analysis. Skandinavisk Aktuarietidskrift, 1952, 35, 223–239.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, J. H. The algebraic eigenvalue problem, Oxford: Clarendon, 1965.Google Scholar
Wilks, S. S. Weighting systems for linear functions of correlated variables when there is no dependent variable. Psychometrika, 1938, 3, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar