Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T04:05:40.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Three Notes on ALSCAL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Forrest W. Young*
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina
Yoshio Takane
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Forrest Young, Psychometric Laboratory, Davie Hall 013-A, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514.

Abstract

It is reported that (1) a new coordinate estimation routine is superior to that originally proposed for ALSCAL; (2) an oversight in the interval measurement level case has been found and corrected; and (3) a new initial configuration routine is superior to the original.

Type
Notes And Comments
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr. Takane is currently at McGill University, Department of Psychology.

References

Reference Notes

de Leeuw, J., Pruzansky, S. A new computational method to fit the weighted euclidean distance model. (Tech. Mem. 75-1299-12), 1975, Murray Hill, New Jersey: Bell Laboratories.Google Scholar
de Leeuw, J. Personal communication, 1976.Google Scholar

References

Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J. J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition. Psychometrika, 1970, 35, 238319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönemann, P. H. An algebraic solution for a class of subjective metrics models. Psychometrika, 1972, 37, 441451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takane, Y., Young, F. W., & de Leeuw, J. Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features. Psychometrika, 1977, 42, 767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar