Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T11:57:43.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three Common Factor Models for Groups of Variables

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Roderick P. McDonald
Roderick P. McDonald*
Affiliation:
The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For the case of two or more groups of variables (batteries), generalizations on three common factor models, the Equal Residual Variances model, the Image model of Jöreskog, and the Canonical Factor Analysis model, are described and illustrated with empirical examples.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , March 1970 , pp. 111 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author is indebted to Dr. E. J. Burr for his valuable criticisms.

References

Anderson, T. W. and Rubin, H. Statistical inference in factor analysis. Proceedings of the third Berkeley Symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. Vol. V, 1956.Google Scholar
Bartlett, M. S. The statistical conception of mental factors. British Journal of Psychology, 1937, 28, 97–104.Google Scholar
Gibson, W. A. An asymmetric approach to multiple-factor analysis. British Journal of statistical Psychology, 1961, 14, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P. and Michael, W. B. Approaches to univocal factor scores. Psychometrika, 1948, 13, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guttman, L. Image theory for the structure of quantitative variates. Psychometrika, 1953, 18, 277–296.Google Scholar
Harman, H. H. Modern factor analysis, 1960, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harris, C. W. Some Rao-Guttman relationships. Psychometrika, 1962, 27, 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. W. On factors and factor scores. Psychometrika, 1967, 32, 363–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horst, P. Relations among m sets of variables. Psychometrika, 1961, 26, 129–150.Google Scholar
Horst, P. Factor analysis of data matrices, 1965, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Hotelling, H. The most predictable criterion. Journal of educational Psychology, 1935, 26, 139–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K. Statistical estimation in factor analysis, 1963, Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Kristof, W. Orthogonal inter-battery factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1967, 32, 199–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawley, D. N. A modified method of estimation in factor analysis and some large sample results. In Uppsala symposium on psychological factor analysis, Nordisk Psykologi's Monogr. Ser. No. 3, 1935.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. P. A unified treatment of the weighting problem. Psychometrika, 1968, 33, 351–381.Google ScholarPubMed
McDonald, R. P. and Burr, E. J.. A comparison of four methods of constructing factor scores. Psychometrika, 1967, 32, 381–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, C. R. Estimation and tests of significance in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1955, 20, 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, L. R. An inter-battery method of factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1958, 23, 111–136.Google Scholar
Tucker, L. R. The extension of factor analysis to three-dimensional matrices. In Frederiksen, N., and Gulliksen, H. (Eds.), Contributions to mathematical psychology, 1964, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Tucker, L. R. Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1966, 31, 279–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittle, P. On principal components and least square methods of factor analysis. Skandinavisk Aktuarietidskrift, 1952, 35, 223–239.Google Scholar