Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:24:06.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Testing Whether Independent Treatment Groups have Equal Medians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Rand R. Wilcox
Rand R. Wilcox*
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Rand Wilcox, Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper suggests new methods for comparing the medians corresponding to independent treatment groups. The procedures are based on the Harrell-Davis estimator in conjunction with a slight modification and extension of the bootstrap calibration technique suggested by Loh. Alternatives to the Harrell-Davis estimator are briefly discussed. For the special case of two treatment groups, the proposed procedure always had more power than the Fligner-Rust solution, as well as the procedure examined by Wilcox and Charlin. Included is an illustration, using real data, that comparing medians, rather than means, can yield a substantially different conclusion as to whether two distributions differ in terms of some measure of central location.

Keywords

L-statisticsHarrell-Davis estimatorbootstrapkernel density estimatessmoothing
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 381 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beran, R. (1987). Prepivoting to reduce level error of confidence. Biometrika, 74, 457–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlin, V. L., Wilcox, R. R. (1989). An algorithm for comparing medians. Psychometrika, 54, 345–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dana, E. (1988). Salience of the self and the salience of a standard: Attempts to match self to a standard, Los Angeles: Department of Psychology, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
DiCiccio, T. J., Romano, J. P. (1988). A review of bootstrap confidence intervals (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 50, 338–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D. G., Hsu, J. C. (1983). Multiple comparisons with the best treatment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 965–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, B. (1982). The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans, Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, B. (1987). Better bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, M. (1984). Relative deficiency of kernel type estimators of quantiles. The Annals of Statistics, 12, 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, M. (1985). Asymptotic normality of the kernel quantile estimator. The Annals of Statistics, 13, 428–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fligner, M. A., Policello, (1981). Robust rank procedures for the Behrens-Fisher problem. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 162–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fligner, M. A., Rust, S. W. (1982). A modification of Mood's median test for the generalized Behrens-Fisher problem. Biometrika, 69, 221–226.Google Scholar
Hall, P., Martin, M. A. (1988). Exact convergence rate of bootstrap quantile variance estimator. Theory of Probability and Related Fields, 80, 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrell, F. E., Davis, C. E. (1982). A new distribution-free quantile estimator. Biometrika, 69, 635–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hettmansperger, T. P. (1973). A large sample conservative test for location with unknown scale parameters. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68, 466–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hettmansperger, T. P., Malin, J. S. (1975). A modified Mood's test for location with no shape assumptions on the underlying distribution. Biometrika, 62, 527–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkley, D. V., Shi, S. (1989). Importance sampling and the nested bootstrap. Biometrika, 76, 435–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, M. V. (1988). Importance sampling for bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 709–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaigh, W. D. (1983). Quantile interval estimation. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 12, 2427–2443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaigh, W. D. (1988). O-statistics and their applications. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 17, 2191–2210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaigh, W. D., Lachenbruch, P. A. (1982). A generalized quantile estimator. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 11, 2217–2238.Google Scholar
Loh, W. (1987). Calibrating confidence coefficients. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majumbar, K. L., Bhattacharjee, G. P. (1973). The incomplete beta integral (Algorithm AS 63). Applied Statistics, 22, 409–411.Google Scholar
Maritz, J. S., Jarrett, R. G. (1978). A note on estimating the variance of the sample median. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73, 194–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKean, J. W., Schrader, R. M. (1984). A comparison of methods for studentizing the sample median. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 13, 751–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 156–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. G. (1974). The Jackknife—a review. Biometrika, 61, 1–15.Google Scholar
Mood, A. M. (1954). On the asymptotic efficiency of certain nonparametric two-sample tests. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25, 514–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parr, W. C., Schucany, W. R. (1982). Jackknifing L-statistics with smooth weight functions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 629–638.Google Scholar
Parrish, R. S. (1990). Comparison of quantile estimators in normal sampling. Biometrics, 46, 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potthoff, R. F. (1963). Use of the Wilcoxon statistic for a generalized Behrens-Fisher problem. Annals of Statistics, 34, 1596–1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramberg, J. S., Tadikamalla, P. R., Dudewicz, E. J., Mykytka, E. F. (1979). A probability distribution and its uses in fitting data. Technometrics, 21, 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, R.-D. (1980). One-sided tests for quantiles in certain nonparametric models. In Revesz, P. (Eds.), Nonparametric statistical inference (pp. 759–772). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Scott, D. W., Factor, L. E. (1981). Monte Carlo study of three data-based nonparametric probability density estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, D. W., Tapia, R. A., Thompson, J. R. (1977). Kernel density estimation revisited. Journal of Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Methods and Applications, 1, 339–372.Google Scholar
Sen, P. K. (1964). On some properties of the rank-weighted mean. Journal of the Indian Society for Agricultural Statistics, 16, 51–61.Google Scholar
Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis, London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Silverman, B. W., Young, G. A. (1987). The bootstrap: To smooth or not to smooth. Biometrika, 74, 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, S. M., Davis, C. E. (1985). Distribution-free confidence intervals for quantiles in small samples. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 14, 979–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. C. (1989). Bootstrap choice of the smoothing parameter in kernel density estimation. Biometrika, 76, 705–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, B. (1937). The significance of the difference between two means when the population variances are unequal. Biometrika, 29, 350–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, R. R. (1987). New statistical procedures for the social sciences, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wilcox, R. R. (in press). Comparing the means of two independent treatment groups. Biometrical Journal.Google Scholar
Wilcox, R. R., Charlin, V. (1986). Comparing medians: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanagawa, T. (1969). A small sample robust competitor of Hodges-Lehmann estimate. Bulletin of Mathematical Statistics, 13, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, S. (1985). A smooth nonparametric estimator of a quantile function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80, 1004–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshizawa, C. N., Sen, P. K., Davis, C. E. (1985). Asymptotic equivalence of the Harrell-Davis median estimator and the sample median. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 14, 2129–2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaremba, S. K. (1962). A generalization of Wilcoxon's test. Monatshefte fur Mathematik, 66, 359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar