Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T03:39:33.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Additional Results on Principal Components Analysis of Three-Mode Data by Means of Alternating Least Squares Algorithms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Jos M. F. ten Berge ,
Jan de Leeuw  and
Pieter M. Kroonenberg
Jos M. F. ten Berge*
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
Jan de Leeuw
Affiliation:
University of Leiden
Pieter M. Kroonenberg
Affiliation:
University of Leiden
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Jos M. F. ten Berge, Subfakulteit Psychologie, RU Groningen, Grote Markt 32, 9712 HV Groningen, THE NETHERLANDS.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kroonenberg and de Leeuw (1980) have developed an alternating least-squares method TUCKALS-3 as a solution for Tucker's three-way principal components model. The present paper offers some additional features of their method. Starting from a reanalysis of Tucker's problem in terms of a rank-constrained regression problem, it is shown that the fitted sum of squares in TUCKALS-3 can be partitioned according to elements of each mode of the three-way data matrix. An upper bound to the total fitted sum of squares is derived. Finally, a special case of TUCKALS-3 is related to the Carroll/Harshman CANDECOMP/PARAFAC model.

Keywords

partitioning of least-squares fitrank-constrained regressionCandecompParafac
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , March 1987 , pp. 183 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carroll, J. D., Pruzansky, S. (1984). The CANDECOMP/CANDELINC family of models and methods for multidimensional data analysis. In Law, H. G., Snyder, C. W., Hattie, J. A., McDonald, R. P. (Eds.), Research methods for multimode data analysis (pp. 372–402). New-York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Eckart, C., Young, G. (1936). The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika, 1, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harshman, R. A. (1970). Foundations of the Parafac procedure: Models and conditions for an ‘explanatory’ multi-mode factor analysis, Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Harshman, R. A., Lundy, M. E. (1984). The PARAFAC model for three-way factor analysis and multidimensional scaling. In Law, H. G., Snyder, C. W., Hattie, J. A., McDonald, R. P. (Eds.), Research methods for multimode data analysis (pp. 122–215). New-York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Harshman, R. A., Lundy, M. E. (1984). Data preprocessing and the extended PARAFAC model. In Law, H. G., Snyder, C. W., Hattie, J. A., McDonald, R. P. (Eds.), Research methods for multimode data analysis (pp. 216–284). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kroonenberg, P. M. (1983). Three-mode Principal Component Analysis, Leiden: DSWO-Press.Google Scholar
Kroonenberg, P. M., de Leeuw, J. (1980). Principal component analysis of three-mode data by means of alternating least squares algorithms. Psychometrika, 45, 69–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, R. (1956). On the best approximate solutions of linear matrix equations. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 52, 17–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ten Berge, J. M. F. (1983). A generalization of Kristof's theorem on the trace of certain matrix products. Psychometrika, 48, 519–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, L. R. (1963). Implications of factor analysis of three-way matrices for measurement of change. In Harris, C. W. (Eds.), Problems in measuring change, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, L. R. (1964). The extension of factor analysis to three-dimensional matrices. In Gulliksen, H., Frederiksen, N. (Eds.), Contributions to mathematical psychology, New-York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Tucker, L. R. (1966). Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika, 31, 279–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weesie, H. M. & van Houwelingen, J. C. (1983). GEPCAM User's Manual. Unpublished manuscript, University of Utrecht, Institute for Mathematical Statistics.Google Scholar