Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T11:24:21.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Relationship between Harris Factors and Guttman’s Sixth Lower Bound to Reliability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

W. Alan Nicewander
W. Alan Nicewander*
Affiliation:
University of Oklahoma
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using an approach nearly identical to one adopted by Guttman, it is established that within the framework of classical test theory the squared multiple correlation for predicting an element of a composite measure from the n − 1 remaining elements is a lower-bound to the reliability of the element. The relationship existing between the reliabilities of the elements of a composite measure and their squared-multiple correlations with remaining elements is used to derive Guttman’s sixth lower bound (λ6) to the reliability of a composite measure. It is shown that Harris factors of a correlation matrix R are associated with a set of (observable) uncorrelated latent variables having maximum coefficients λ6.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , June 1975 , pp. 197 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Parts of this paper were presented at the Spring Psychometric Society Meetings, Stanford University, March, 1974.

References

Bentler, P. M.. Alpha-maximized factor analysis (alphamax) and its relation to canonical and alpha factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1968, 33, 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L.. A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 1945, 10, 255–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guttman, L.. The determinacy of factor score matrices, with implications for five other basic problems of common factor theory. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1955, 8, 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. W.. Some Rao-Guttman relationships. Psychometrika, 1962, 27, 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotelling, H.. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1933, 24, 417–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, H. F.. Image analysis. In Harris, C. W. (Eds.), Problems in measuring change. Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press. 1963, 156–166.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H. F., and Caffrey, J.. Alpha Factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1965, 30, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lord, F. M., and Novick, M.. Statistical theories of mental test scores, 1968, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Rao, C. R.. Estimation and tests of significance in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1955, 20, 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönemann, P. H.. The minimum average correlation between equivalent sets of uncorrelated factors. Psychometrika, 1971, 36, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar