Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T11:07:37.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Relationship between Degree of Original Learning and Degree of Transfer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Harold Gulliksen*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

Extract

It has been repeatedly demonstrated that, in a learning situation involving a positive and a negative stimulus, the organism is frequently reacting to the relationship between stimuli rather than to the absolute characteristics of the positive or negative stimulus. For example, if in the original training series an animal has learned to react positively to a ten and negatively to a five centimeter circle, he w,ill, in the majority of trials, when confronted with a ten and a twenty centimeter circle, react positively to the twenty centimeter circle, that is, the larger of the two, and negatively to the ten centimeter circle which was formerly the positive stimulus. This is termed transposition of the relationship greater than from the training or original learning situation to the test or transposition situation.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1936 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

My special thanks and appreciation are extended to Dr. Martin L. Reymert, the Director of the Mooseheart Laboratory for Child Research, for his encouragement in this work, and for furnishing the facilities for the experimental work.

See bibliographical references in Klüver, (3).

References

Fisher, R. A. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh, London: Oliver and Boyd. 1930, 280280.Google Scholar
Gulliksen, Harold, , A rational equation of the learning curve based on Thorndike's law of effect. J. Gen. Psychol., 1934, 2, 395434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluver, Heinrich, , Behavior Mechanisms in Monkeys, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1933.Google Scholar
Lashley, K. S. The mechanism of vision, I. J. Genet. Psychol., 1930, 37, 453460.Google Scholar
Whittaker, E. T. and Robinson, G.The Calculus of Observations. London, Glasgow: Blackie and Son Limited. 1929, 6268.Google Scholar