Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T14:22:10.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Orthogonal Principal Planes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Peter Filzmoser
Peter Filzmoser*
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, Probability Theory and Actuarial Mathematics, Vienna University of Technology, Austria
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Peter Filzmoser, Department of Statistics, Probability Theory and Actuarial Mathematics, Vienna University of Technology, Wiedner Hauptstr. 8-10, A-1040 Vienna, Austria. E-Mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Factor analysis and principal component analysis result in computing a new coordinate system, which is usually rotated to obtain a better interpretation of the results. In the present paper, the idea of rotation to simple structure is extended to two dimensions. While the classical definition of simple structure is aimed at rotating (one-dimensional) factors, the extension to a simple structure for two dimensions is based on the rotation of planes. The resulting planes (principal planes) reveal a better view of the data than planes spanned by factors from classical rotation and hence allow a more reliable interpretation. The usefulness of the method as well as the effectiveness of a proposed algorithm are demonstrated by simulation experiments and an example.

Keywords

principal component analysisfactor analysisorthogonal rotationsimple structure
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 65 , Issue 3 , September 2000 , pp. 363 - 376
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author is most grateful to the referees, the Associate Editor, and the Editor for helpful suggestions, which resulted in a completely improved version of an earlier manuscript. The author also wants to express his gratitude to Johann Millendorfer, the former head of STUDIA, who initiated the idea of this work.

References

Baaske, W. (1988). Principal planes: Visual structure analysis by cluster biplot projection pursuit in a multinational survey. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 26, 303–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J.B. (1953). An analytic solution for approximating simple structure in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 18, 23–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, J.H. (1987). Exploratory projection pursuit. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(397), 249–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, K.R. (1971). The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika, 58(3), 453–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebhardt, F. (1968). A counterexample to two-dimensional varimax-rotation. Psychometrika, 33, 35–36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golub, G.H., Ortega, J.M. (1993). Scientific computing, An introduction with parallel computing. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Huber, P.J. (1985). Projection Pursuit. The Annals of Statistics, 13(2), 435–475Google Scholar
Kaiser, H.F. (1956). Note on Carroll's analytic simple structure. Psychometrika, 21, 89–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, H.F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mardia, K.V., Kent, J.T., Bibby, J.M. (1979). Multivariate analysis. London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Studia and Albtum Technical Report. (1993). Externe Leistungen der bäuerlichen Landwirtschaft in Bayern [External service of the rural agriculture in Bavaria]. Munich: Author. (In German)Google Scholar
ten Berge, J.M.F. (1984). A joint treatment of varimax rotation and the problem of diagonalizing symmetric matrices simultaneously in the least-squares sense. Psychometrika, 48, 347–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L.L. (1944). Second-order factors. Psychometrika, 9, 71–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar