Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T11:07:40.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Symmetric Treatment of an Asymmetric Approach to Factor Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

W. A. Gibson*
Affiliation:
Queens College of The City University of New York

Abstract

On the assumption that a partitioning can be found such that three mutually exclusive test vector configurations span the same factor space, a procedure is derived whereby symmetric parts of the correlation matrix are estimated from functions of asymmetric parts treated symmetrically. This yields an explicit matrix formula for communality estimation which generalizes earlier work by Albert. Conventional factoring methods, with all their computational and fitting advantages, can be applied once the symmetric portions of the correlation matrix have been estimated. Extension to four subgroups of test vectors allows for a matrix generalization of the old tetrad difference criterion to the multiple-factor case.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1963 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, A. A. The matrices of factor analysis. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., 1944, 30, 9095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albert, A. A. The minimum rank of a correlation matrix. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., 1944, 30, 144146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckart, C. and Young, G. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika, 1936, 1, 211218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, W. A. An asymmetric approach to multiple-factor analysis. Brit. J. statist. Psychol., 1961, 14, 97107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. Multiple-factor analysis, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Tucker, L. R. An inter-battery method of factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1958, 23, 111136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar