Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
McLean, Leslie D.
1966.
Chapter I: Design and Analysis Methodology—An Overview.
Review of Educational Research,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 5,
p.
491.
Cronbach, Lee J.
1968.
Intelligence? Creativity? A Parsimonious Reinterpretation of the Wallach-Kogan Data.
American Educational Research Journal,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 4,
p.
491.
Carroll, John B.
and
Wilson, Gertrude F.
1969.
AN INTERACTIVE‐COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR THE JOHNSON‐NEYMAN TECHNIQUE IN THE CASE OF TWO GROUPS, TWO PREDICTOR VARIABLES, AND ONE CRITERION VARIABLE.
ETS Research Bulletin Series,
Vol. 1969,
Issue. 2,
Cahen, Leonard S.
1969.
APTITUDE‐TREATMENT INTERACTIONS: SOME CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS1.
ETS Research Bulletin Series,
Vol. 1969,
Issue. 2,
Carroll, John B.
and
Wilson, Gertrude F.
1970.
An Interactive-Computer Program for the Johnson-Neyman Technique in the Case of Two Groups, Two Predictor Variables, and One Criterion Variable.
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 1,
p.
121.
Cahen, Leonard S.
and
Linn, Robert L.
1970.
REGIONS OF SIGNIFICANT CRITERION DIFFERENCES IN APTITUDE‐TREATMENT‐INTERACTION RESEARCH1.
ETS Research Bulletin Series,
Vol. 1970,
Issue. 2,
Bracht, Glenn H.
1970.
Experimental Factors Related to Aptitude-Treatment Interactions.
Review of Educational Research,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 5,
p.
627.
Cahen, Leonard S.
and
Linn, Robert L.
1971.
Regions of Significant Criterion Differences in Aptitude-Treatment-Interaction Research.
American Educational Research Journal,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 3,
p.
521.
Aitkin, Murray A.
1972.
FIXED‐WIDTH CONFIDENCE INTERVALS IN LINEAR REGRESSION WITH APPLICATIONS TO THE JOHNSON‐NEYMAN TECHNIQUE.
ETS Research Bulletin Series,
Vol. 1972,
Issue. 1,
Borich, Gary D.
and
Wunderlich, Kenneth W.
1973.
Johnson-Neyman Revisited: Determining Interactions Among Group Regressions and Plotting Regions of Significance in the Case of Two Groups, Two Predictors, and One Criterion.
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 1,
p.
155.
Pigache, R.M.
Graham, B.R.
and
Freedman, L.
1976.
A modification of the Johnson-Neyman technique comparing two regressions, applied to treatment effects dependent on baseline levels.
Biological Psychology,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 3,
p.
213.
Sheehan, Daniel S.
and
Hambleton, Ronald K.
1977.
Adapting instruction to student differences in an individualized science program.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
27.
Gustafsson, Jan‐Eric
1977.
Differential Effects of Imagery Instructions on Pupils with Different Abilities.
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 1,
p.
157.
NAMIKI, HIROSHI
and
HAYASHI, JUNKO
1977.
DETERMINATION OF OPTIMAL INSTRUCTIONAL TREATMENT IN ATI OF TWO APTITUDE DIMENSIONS AND MULTIPLE TREATMENTS.
Japanese Psychological Research,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
56.
1980.
Statistical Methods for Comparative Studies.
p.
140.
Hollingsworth, Holly H.
1980.
An Analytical Investigation of the Effects of Heterogeneous Regression Slopes in Analysis of Covariance.
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 3,
p.
611.
Karpman, Mitchell B.
1980.
Ancova—A One Covariate Johnson-Neyman Algorithm.
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 3,
p.
791.
Serlin, Ronald C.
and
Levin, Joel R.
1980.
Identifying Regions of Significance in Aptitude-by-Treatment-Interaction Research.
American Educational Research Journal,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 3,
p.
389.
Rogosa, David
1981.
On the Relationship Between the Johnson-Neyman Region of Significance and Statistical Tests of Parallel Within-Group Regressions.
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 1,
p.
73.
1981.
Letters to the Editor.
The American Statistician,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 3,
p.
176.