Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T14:05:23.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Logistic Positive Exponent Family of Models: Virtue of Asymmetric Item Characteristic Curves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Fumiko Samejima*
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Fumiko Samejima, Department of Psychology, 405 Austin Peay Bldg., University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-0900. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The paper addresses and discusses whether the tradition of accepting point-symmetric item characteristic curves is justified by uncovering the inconsistent relationship between the difficulties of items and the order of maximum likelihood estimates of ability. This inconsistency is intrinsic in models that provide point-symmetric item characteristic curves, and in this paper focus is put on the normal ogive model for observation. It is also questioned if in the logistic model the sufficient statistic has forfeited the rationale that is appropriate to the psychological reality. It is observed that the logistic model can be interpreted as the case in which the inconsistency in ordering the maximum likelihood estimates is degenerated.

The paper proposes a family of models, called the logistic positive exponent family, which provides asymmetric item chacteristic curves. A model in this family has a consistent principle in ordering the maximum likelihood estimates of ability. The family is divided into two subsets each of which has its own principle, and includes the logistic model as a transition from one principle to the other. Rationale and some illustrative examples are given.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R. (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison WesleyGoogle Scholar
Levine, M. (1984). An introduction to multilinear formula scoring theory. Champaign, IL: University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison WesleyGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J. O. (1991). Kernel smoothing approaches to nonparametric item characteristic curve estimation. Psychometrika, 56, 611630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J. O., Abrahamowicz, M. (1989). Binomial regression with monotone spines: A psychometric application. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 906915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, No. 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samejima, F. (1972). A general model for free-response data. Psychometrika Monograph, No. 18.Google Scholar
Samejima, F. (1973). A comment on Birnbaum's three-parameter logistic model in the latent trait theory. Psychometrika, 38, 221233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samejima, F. (1995). Acceleration model in the heterogeneous case of the general graded response model. Psychometrika, 60, 549572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samejima, F. (1996). Evaluation of mathematical models for ordered polychotomous responses. Behaviormetrika, 23, 1735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samejima, F. (1998). Efficient nonparametric approaches for estimating the operating characteristics of discrete item responses. Psychometrika, 63, 111130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samejima, F. (1999, April). Usefulness of the logistic positive exponent family of models in educational measurement. Paper presented at the 1999 Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar