Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T12:20:43.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Johnson-Neyman Technique, its Theory and Application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Palmer O. Johnson  and
Leo C. Fay
Palmer O. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Leo C. Fay
Affiliation:
State Teachers College, Cortland, N. Y.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The theoretical basis for the Johnson-Neyman Technique is here presented for the first time in an American journal. In addition, a simplified working procedure is outlined, step-by-step, for an actual problem. The determination of significance is arrived at early in the analysis; and where no significant difference is found, the problem is complete at this point. The plotting of the region of significance where a significant difference does exist has also been simplified by using the procedure of rotation and translation of axes.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 1950 , pp. 349 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © 1950 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Johnson, Pahner O., and Neyman, J. Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1933, 1, 72-93.

References

Bond, Austin D. An experiment in the teaching of genetics. Teach. Coll. Contr. Educ., No. 797, 1940.Google Scholar
Bond, Ev. Reading and ninth grade achievement. Teach. Coll. Contri. Educ., No. 756, 1938.Google Scholar
Clark, Ella C. An experimental evaluation of the school excursion. J. exper. Educ., 1943, 12, 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deemer, Walter L., and Rulon, Phillip J. An experimental comparison of two shorthand systems. Harvard Studies in Education, No. 28, 1943.Google Scholar
Deemer, Walter L. An empirical study of the relative merits of Gregg shorthand and Script shorthand. Harvard Studies in Education, No. 22, 1944.Google Scholar
Fay, Leo C. The relationship between specific reading skills and selected areas of sixth grade achievement. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, 1948.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A., and Yates, F. Statistical tables for biological, agricultural and medical research, London: Oliver and Boyd, 1943.Google Scholar
Fine, Henry, and Thompson, Henr. Coordinate geometry, New York: Macmillan Co., 1911.Google Scholar
Hansen, Carl W. Factors associated with successful achievement in problem solving in sixth grade arithmetic. J. educ. Res., 1944, 38, 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyt, Cyril. Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to problems in elementary college physics. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, 1944.Google Scholar
Johnson, Harry C. The effect of instruction in mathematical vocabulary upon problem solving in arithmetic. J. educ. Res., 1944, 38, 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Palmer O. The measurement of the effectiveness of laboratory procedures upon the achievement of students in zoology with particular reference to the use and value of detailed drawings. Proceedings of the Minnesota Academy of Science, 1940, 8, 70–76.Google Scholar
Johnson, Palmer O. The increase in precision in educational and psychological experimentation through statistical controls. J. educ. Res., 1944, 38, 149–152.Google Scholar
Johnson, Palmer O., Hoyt, Cyri. On determining three dimensional regions of signifiance. J. exper. Educ., 1947, 15, 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Palmer O., Neyman, J. Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their applications to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1936, 1, 57–93.Google Scholar
Koenker, Robert H., and Hansen, Carl W. Steps for the application of the Johnson-Neyman technique—a sample analysis. J. exper. Educ., 1942, 10, 164–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodziejczyk, Stanisla. On an important class of statistical hypotheses. Biometrika, 1935, 27, 161–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyman, J., and Pearson, E. S. On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for the purpose of statistical inference. Biometrika, 1928, 20, 175–240.Google Scholar
Pearson, K. Tables of the incomplete beta function, London: Biometrika Office, University College, 1934.Google Scholar
Peterson, Shailer. The evaluation of a one-year course, the fusion of physics and chemistry, with other physical science courses. Science Education, 1945, 29, 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treacy, John P. The relationship of reading skills to the ability to solve arithmetic problems. J. educ. Res., 1944, 38, 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, W. A., and Tracy, J. I. Analytical geometry, New York: D. C. Heath and Company, 1937.Google Scholar