Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T11:22:56.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fundamental Factors of Comprehension in Reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Frederick B. Davis
Frederick B. Davis*
Affiliation:
Cooperative Test Service of the American Council on Education
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A survey of the literature was made to determine the skills involved in reading comprehension that are deemed most important by authorities. Multiple-choice test items were constructed to measure each of nine skills thus identified as basic. The intercorrelations of the nine skill scores were factored, each skill being weighted in the initial matrix roughly in proportion to its importance in reading comprehension, as judged by authorities. The principal components were rather readily interpretable in terms of the initial variables. Individual scores in components I and II are sufficiently reliable to warrant their use for practical purposes, and useful measures of other components could be provided by constructing the required number of additional items. The results also indicate need for workbooks to aid in improving students' use of basic reading skills. The study provides more detailed information regarding the skills measured by the Cooperative Reading Comprehension Tests than has heretofore been provided regarding the skills actually measured by any other widely used reading test. Statistical techniques for estimating the reliability coefficients of individual scores in principal-axes components, for determining whether component variances are greater than would be yielded by chance, and for calculating the significance of the differences between successive component variances are illustrated.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , September 1944 , pp. 185 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © 1944 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

On leave for military service.

**

For a detailed presentation of the basic data of this study, see (8).

References

Adler, M. J. How to read a book, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1940.Google Scholar
Alderman, G. H. Improving comprehension in reading. J. educ. Res., 1926, 13, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, B. T. Improving freshman reading habits. Engl. J., College Edition, 1931, 20, 824–828.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. P. An experimental study of comprehension in reading, New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1927.Google Scholar
The Cooperative General Achievement Tests (Revised Series): Information concerning their construction, interpretation, and use. New York: Cooperative Test Service, 1940.Google Scholar
The Cooperative Reading Comprehension Tests: Information concerning their construction, interpretation, and use. New York: Cooperative Test Service, 1940.Google Scholar
The Cooperative Reading Comprehension Tests, Lower and Higher Levels; Forms Q, R, S, and T. New York: Cooperative Test Service.Google Scholar
Davis, Frederick B. Fundamental factors of comprehension in reading. Unpublished doctor's thesis on file at Harvard University Library, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1941.Google Scholar
Davis, Frederick B. Two new measures of reading ability. J. educ. Psychol., 1942, 33, 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. C. The acquisition of facts as a measure of reading comprehension. Elem. Sch. J., 1935, 35, 346–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feder, D. D. Comprehension maturity tests—a new technique in mental measurement. J. educ. Psychol., 1938, 29, 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, R. A study of critical reading comprehension in the intermediate grades, New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1940.Google Scholar
Gates, A. I. Methods of constructing and validating the Gates Reading Tests. Teach. Coll. Rec., 1927, 29, 148–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, A. I. The improvement of reading, New York: Macmillan Company, 1935.Google Scholar
Gates, A. I. and Van Alstyne, D. General and specific effects of training in reading with observations on the experimental technique. Teach. Coll. Rec., 1924, 25, 98–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, W. S. Principles of method in teaching reading as derived from scientific investigation. National Society for the Study of Education, Yearbook 18, Part II (pp. 26–51). Bloomington, Illinois: Public School Publishing Company, 1919.Google Scholar
Gray, W. S. The nature and types of reading. National Society for the Study of Education, Yearbook 26, Part I (pp. 23–40). Bloomington, Illinois: Public School Publishing Co., 1937.Google Scholar
Gray, W. S. and Leary, B. E. What makes a book readable, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1935.Google Scholar
Hildreth, G. H. Learning the three R's, Minneapolis: Educational Publishers, Inc., 1936.Google Scholar
Hilliard, G. H. Probable types of difficulties underlying low scores in comprehension tests, Princeton, N. J.: Psychological Review Co., 1924.Google Scholar
Irion, T. W. H. Comprehension difficulties of ninth-grade students in the study of literature, New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1925.Google Scholar
Kelley, T. L. Essential traits of mental life, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Univ. Press, 1935.Google Scholar
Langsam, R. S. A factorial analysis of reading ability. J. exp. Educ., 1941, 10, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCallister, J. M. Determining the types of reading in studying content subjects. Sch. Rev., 1932, 40, 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, P. G. The role of the concept in reading ability. Univ. Iowa Studies in Psychology, XVII (pp. 21–73). Princeton, N. J.: Psychological Review Co., 1933.Google Scholar
Pressey, L. W. and Pressey, S. L. A critical study of the concept of silent reading. J. educ. Psychol., 1921, 12, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, I. A. Practical criticism, New York: Harcourt Brace, 1929.Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. How to read a page, New York: Harcourt Brace, 1942.Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. Interpretation in teaching, New York: Harcourt Brace, 1938.Google Scholar
Sangren, P. V. The improvement of reading through the use of tests, Lansing, Mich.: De Kleine, 1931.Google Scholar
Shank, S. Student responses in the measurement of reading comprehension, Cincinnati: C. A. Gregory, 1929.Google Scholar
Strang, R. Problems in the improvement of reading in high school and college, Lancaster, Pa.: Science Press Publishing Co., 1938.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. The psychology of thinking in the case of reading. Psychol. Rev., 1917, 24, 220–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. Reading as reasoning: A study of mistakes in paragraph reading. J. educ. Psychol., 1917, 8, 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. The understanding of sentences. Elem. Sch. J., 1917, 18, 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touton, F. C. and Berry, B. T. Reading comprehension at the junior college level. Calif. Quarterly sec. Educ., 1931, 6, 245–251.Google Scholar
Tyler, R. W. Measuring the ability to infer. Educ. Res. Bull., 1930, 9, 475–480.Google Scholar
Woody, C. Measurement of a new phase of reading. J. educ. Res., 1923, 8, 315–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyman, J. B. and Wendle, M. What is reading ability?. J. educ. Psychol., 1921, 12, 518–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoakum, G. A. Reading and study, New York: Macmillan Co., 1928.Google Scholar
Zahner, L. C. The testing of comprehension. Educ. Rec., 1940, 21 No. 1371–89.Google Scholar
Zahner, L. C. An approach to reading through meanings. Ch. IV in Reading in General Education, Washington, D. C.: American Council on Education, 1940.Google Scholar