Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T12:00:22.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Feasible Method for Standard Errors of Estimate in Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

R. I. Jennrich  and
D. B. Clarkson
R. I. Jennrich*
Affiliation:
University of California at Los Angeles
D. B. Clarkson
Affiliation:
University of Missouri at Saint Louis
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Robert I. Jennrich, Department of Mathematics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A jackknife-like procedure is developed for producing standard errors of estimate in maximum likelihood factor analysis. Unlike earlier methods based on information theory, the procedure developed is computationally feasible on larger problems. Unlike earlier methods based on the jackknife, the present procedure is not plagued by the factor alignment problem, the Heywood case problem, or the necessity to jackknife by groups. Standard errors may be produced for rotated and unrotated loading estimates using either orthogonal or oblique rotation as well as for estimates of unique factor variances and common factor correlations. The total cost for larger problems is a small multiple of the square of the number of variables times the number of observations used in the analysis. Examples are given to demonstrate the feasibility of the method.

Keywords

maximum likelihood factor analysisstandard errorsjackknifepseudo valuescomputer algorithmsdifferentialsalignment problemHeywood case
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , June 1980 , pp. 237 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The research done by R. I. Jennrich was supported in part by NSF Grant MCS 77-02121. The research done by D. B. Clarkson was supported in part by NSERC Grant A3109.

References

Archer, C. O. & Jennrich, R. I. Standard errors for orthogonally rotated factor loadings. Psychometrika, 1973, 38, 581–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, D. B. Estimating the standard errors of rotated factor loadings by jackknifing. Psychometrika, 1979, 44, 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frane, J. W. & Jennrich, R. I. P4M factor analysis. In Dixon, W. J. & Brown, M. B. (Eds.), BMDP biomedical computer programs. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1977, 656–696.Google Scholar
Girshick, M. A. On the sampling theory of roots of determinental equations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1939, 10, 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, H. H. Modern factor analysis, 1967, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jennrich, R. I. Standard errors for obliquely rotated factor loadings. Psychometrika, 1973, 38, 593–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennrich, R. I. On the stability of rotated loadings: The Wexler phenomenon. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1973, 26, 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennrich, R. I. & Thayer, D. T. A note on Lawley's formulas for standard errors in maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38, 571–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawley, D. N. Some new results in maximum likelihood factor analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1967, A67, 256–264.Google Scholar
Lawley, D. N. & Maxwell, A. E. Factor analysis as a statistical method, 1971, New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar
Pennell, R. Routinely computable confidence intervals for factor loadings using the “jackknife.”. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1972, 25, 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, C. R. Estimation and tests of significance in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1955, 20, 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, C. R. Linear statistical inference, 1965, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar