Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T11:54:47.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimation of J Scales for Unidimensional Unfolding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Thomas P. Hettmansperger
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University
Hoben Thomas
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University

Abstract

In Coombs' unidimensional unfolding theory each individual ranks all stimuli, often in terms of preference judgments. These ranks, called I scales, are used to infer the latent continuum called a J scale which is presumed to have generated the I scale rankings. A major problem concerns the inference of the J scale given a set of I scales because an I scale is not unique to any one J scale. This paper presents a procedure for estimating J scale probabilities given a set of I scales. Models for three and four or more stimuli are presented. Results of computer tests are reported.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coombs, C. H. Theory of data, 1964, New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Good, I. J. The estimation of probabilities: An essay on modern Bayesian methods, 1965, Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. PressGoogle Scholar
Graybill, F. A. Introduction to matrices with applications in statistics, 1969, Belmont, Calif.: WadsworthGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, D. J., & Weizmann, F. The measurement of visual attention in infants: A comparison of two methodologies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1971, 11, 234243CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, H. S., & Knight, S. R. Higher algebra, 4th ed., New York: Macmillan, 1957Google Scholar
Koopman, P. R., & Ames, E. W. Infants' preferences for facial arrangements: A failure to replicate. Child Development, 1968, 39, 481487CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed